Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 May 2005 (Saturday) 12:24
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Do you prefer Type I CF or Type II MD?"
Type I CF
15
83.3%
Type II Microdrive
3
16.7%

18 voters, 18 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Prefer Type I CF or Type II MD?

 
epeace
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Miami Beach
     
May 14, 2005 12:24 |  #1

Im curious to see what your opinions are on the 2 types of CF available . . do you like the solid state of type I or do you prefer type II? Please include reasons you lean one way or the other in your replies . .

I used to think that Type II was faster but these days I'm not so sure . . . plus the solid state of Type I eliminates many points of failure . . so I think I'm torn at this point . .


/ // epeace / / /
www.ezrapeacephotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Location: The Netherlands
     
May 14, 2005 12:29 |  #2

The only difference between Type I and Type II CF cards is that Type II cards are a bit thicker than the other. Type II CF cards are not faster than Type I CF cards, neither the other way around. It is true that most microdrives are Type II, but that's not necessarily so.

Did you mean to ask "Do you prefer solid state or microdrive CF cards?" instead of Type I vs. Type II?


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
May 14, 2005 16:38 |  #3

Like Jesper said, what's there to like or dislike about either CF types? What's important is what's inside the body. :confused: But, based on your post, I think what you really want to ask is if whether we prefer solid-state CF or microdrive CF cards. If that's the case, I'll vote for solid-state CF cards.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
May 14, 2005 19:35 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #4

Same solid state beats micro drive.
For trivia, the first two 4 and 8GB CF cards were type II solid state if I remember right. At like $4000 and $5000 US when they first came out.


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
May 14, 2005 19:52 |  #5

Based on epeace's second paragraph,.. I am sure Type II means Microdrive..

I edited the poll to clarify. Hope you don't mind ;)


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
defordphoto
MKIII Aficionado
9,888 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
     
May 14, 2005 19:56 as a reply to  @ CyberDyneSystems's post |  #6

Edited even a bit more. ;)

I have two IBM MDs which have been faultless for three years. That being said, I don't see myself buying another one in the near future. I just snagged a 4gig SanDisk. Yummy! :)


defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography®
SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII
www.ussbaracing.com (external link) | www.rfmsports.com (external link) | www.nwfjcc.com (external link)
An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ducdubbq
Member
120 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: long island New York
     
May 15, 2005 06:20 |  #7

i have to admit i like the MD. I don't know why, one even fried on me, so I sent it back and got a replacement, but I also added 2 - 1gb ultra II cards which I go like.

i think its storage space. i put in the ultras and its 200 photos or so. I put in the MD and my 20d flashes 999, because its much more than that.

but the MD are far quirkier, so now I'm only erasing, formating in camera.


"let me guess, you got another camera. No! another lens"
canon 20d, elan 7, eos 1n + speed booster, eos ix (aps)
Canon 20/2.8, 28/2.8, 50/1.8, 135/2 L, (!) Sigma 105 Macro,Tokina 300/4, Leica R 50/2, Leica R 135/2.8, Leica R 180/2.8 (!)
Canon 28-70L, 28-135 IS, 70-200/4 L, 70-300 IS
Tamron 19-35,
Voigtlander Bessa R2 RF, Konica Hexar RF
VC 25/4, VC 35/1.7, konica 50, konica 90
bonica etrsi (medium format) 50, 150, 110-220 (!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
epeace
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Miami Beach
     
May 16, 2005 08:11 |  #8

heh . . thanks for clarifying . . . i was under the impression (if it wasnt obvious) that Type I meant solid state and Type II meant microdrive . . . so there are Type I microdrives?

i have to admit . . the microdrive is neat which was th emotivation behind my initial preference for them . . but from the looks of things solid state may be the way of the future for many people . . .

as a sidebar i happened to find a work around for the slow speed of my 2GB Sandisk standard . . . ive found that if i hit the preview button after every 15 or 20 shots and let it process for about 10 or 15 seconds or as long as i can hold out for (i never actually see the preview or even get the hold bars down to zero in that time) that tends to keep the "busy" msg away for the most part . . . it is a drain on my battery but i miss less shots . .


/ // epeace / / /
www.ezrapeacephotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,926 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Prefer Type I CF or Type II MD?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1711 guests, 140 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.