Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 08 Aug 2009 (Saturday) 16:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

It's 2020 (God help us) and you go to the camera store for a new camera

 
Jon ­ Foster
is it safe?
Avatar
4,521 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Feb 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
     
Aug 13, 2009 23:43 |  #61

20droger wrote in post #8455729 (external link)
It comes as an accessory to the personal flying car that we've been promised for so long.

Can you image the road/air rage if people were able to fly cars? It's crazy enough when the tires are touching the ground. And there are far too many people allowed on the roads right now to be safe. Yikes!

Jon.


I shoot with a Little Canon

Check out my photos @ PBase.com (external link) & ModelMayhem.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joey3000
Mostly Lurking
15 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 14, 2009 18:46 as a reply to  @ Jon Foster's post |  #62

Maybe photographers will be replaced by robots with built in cameras that take amazing pictures.

There will still be you guys, the pioneers of photography, but the evil genius who built these robots will program robot assasins to hunt you guys down. anybody caught with a camera must be terminated!!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Foster
is it safe?
Avatar
4,521 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Feb 2005
Location: White Lake, MI
     
Aug 14, 2009 21:08 |  #63

By that time you'll be considered a pioneer too! DOH. Look out!

Jon.


I shoot with a Little Canon

Check out my photos @ PBase.com (external link) & ModelMayhem.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Aug 15, 2009 08:56 |  #64

I think I could get the following for $200 at a yard sale in 2020 --

1DMKIII
4 L lenses
backpack
accessories

:p


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nemo ­ man
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
785 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 15, 2009 09:39 |  #65

S.Horton wrote in post #8463810 (external link)
I think I could get the following for $200 at a yard sale in 2020 --

1DMKIII
4 L lenses
backpack
accessories

:p

The way the economy is going you will get it next month. :)


http://carregwenimages​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cromfel
Member
46 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Sep 27, 2012 09:24 |  #66

Cromfel wrote in post #8433788 (external link)
2020 whole world will be covered by Google's omnidirectional land cameras combined with satellite based cameras that render fully 3 dimensional view on every location on earth. I just go and open google maps, then go to any location I want at any time of day I like and just take a screenshot of the scenery.

Hell, I can even travel back in time on googles 24 hours long stream buffer what allows me to select the time of the day I want for the shot. Some people even use picture analysis softwares to automaticly get them screenshots of certain types of scenery and have automatic program to place their watermarks and upload the pictures to flickr.

...Then I wake up, drink glass of water and realize it was a bad dream.


Hmmm, forget about that word "land"...

http://www.google.com …nders/great-barrier-reef/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
-MasterChief-
- B E L I E V E -
Avatar
3,188 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Requiem
     
Sep 27, 2012 10:07 |  #67

holy unearthed zombie thread Batman! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 27, 2012 16:33 |  #68

Zombie thread or not, now Iv'e gone and read it. One comment on ISO over IS. I will still want IS and preferably much better than we now have. I want to be able to take shots hand held at 1/60 at 600mm on a 48Mpix 1.6x crop sensor. But then I WANT certain subject motion blur, without camera shake. Oh and it needs to be lens based so I can still see through the viewfinder. Because aI still want an optical one of those too!

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edge100
Goldmember
1,920 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Sep 27, 2012 19:12 |  #69

Film.


Street and editorial photography in Toronto, Canada (external link)
Mirrorless: Fujifilm X-Pro1
Film: Leica MP | Leica M2 | CV Nokton 35/1.4 | CV Nokton 40 f/1.4 | Leitz Summitar 50 f/2 | Canon 50 f/1.2 LTM | Mamiya 7 | Mamiya 80 f/4.0 | Mamiya 150 f/4.5 | Mamiya 43 f/4.5
How to get good colour from C-41 film scans (external link)

Digitizing film with a digital camera (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonneymendoza
Goldmember
3,794 posts
Likes: 391
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 28, 2012 10:19 |  #70

in 2020, the new canon 5d will be mirrorless tech with ISO 12800 looking like ISO 100 of today


Canon 5dmkIII | Canon 85L 1.2 | Sigma 35mm ART 1.4|Canon 16-35mm L 2.8 |Canon 24-70mm L f2.8 | Canon 70-200mm F2.8L MK2 | Canon 430EX MK2 Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8390
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 28, 2012 10:42 |  #71

mikekelley wrote in post #8423807 (external link)
In 2020 we jsut shoot video and pick a frame we like, at 20mp or so.

Yeah, this. In fact, it's hard to believe we aren't already able to do this.

Do you think the technology is already there, to be able to offer this at a very reasonable price, but the manufacturers are holding back on us?


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Sep 28, 2012 10:47 |  #72

Tom Reichner wrote in post #15053919 (external link)
Yeah, this. In fact, it's hard to believe we aren't already able to do this.

Do you think the technology is already there, to be able to offer this at a very reasonable price, but the manufacturers are holding back on us?

The MPEG spec committee and the JPEG spec committee need to collaborate on a single, common spec. Or, they need to cooperate to make a suitable convertor. The real problem is the relatively low res of MPEG...scarcely a 2k pixel image! You'd get real garbage JPG resulting from the movie frame right now.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,636 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8390
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 28, 2012 11:05 |  #73

Wilt wrote in post #15053942 (external link)
The MPEG spec committee and the JPEG spec committee need to collaborate on a single, common spec. Or, they need to cooperate to make a suitable convertor. The real problem is the relatively low res of MPEG...scarcely a 2k pixel image! You'd get real garbage JPG resulting from the movie frame right now.


I would think that if still cameras could be given incredible buffer capacity (many hundreds of times what we have now), and could shoot RAW files continuously at 30+ frames per second at full resolution, then we would basically have video frame rates with full-resolution RAW "edit-ability".

There would not have to be MPEG, JPEG, or any other pegs. Just hundreds of thousands of RAW files, the very best of which could be selected out of the sequence and edited meticulously.

Maybe this view is over-simplified because I am not a technologically-minded person in the least.

It seems, at least to me, that all we are lacking is the technology to record and process this huge amount of data in an incredibly short time period. But if you look at where we were 15 years ago, and where we are now, it doesn't really seem impossible to expect this kind of technology sometime within the next 10 or 20 years, does it?

NOTE: Of course, the current mirror / shutter system in todays DSLRs would have to be abandoned, and replaced with a mirrorless system. Geez - how would we still be able to have a fully optical viewfinder with that?


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Sep 28, 2012 11:09 |  #74

Tom Reichner wrote in post #15054006 (external link)
It seems, at least to me, that all we are lacking is the technology to record and process this huge amount of data in an incredibly short time period.

Yes, we need faster image processors, faster I/O processors to move the data, and HUGEmongous amounts data storage to cope with 20 MPixel frames being captured at 24 fps or faster!

The Canon Pellix was a solution to a camera that could shoot without bothering with a moving reflex mirror. Unfortunately the Pellix lost light from the film, being diverted up to the eyepiece...and the eyepiece was dimmer because of what when straight to the focal plance. And now AF sensor also diverts light from the eyepiece, so they have to figure a better way to do that than the contrast sensing Live View AF, which is inherently more variable than phase sensing normal AF.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
birdfromboat
Goldmember
Avatar
1,839 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: somewhere in Oregon trying to keep this laptop dry
     
Sep 28, 2012 19:59 |  #75

I hope these things come about someday, maybe not by 2020 but in my lifetime
1) bodies will be little more than a means to hold onto a lens, mount all the controls, a viewfinder that is probably a live view screen, possible fiber optic fed with maybe a hotshoe and a wireless transmitter sending all the data to a unit that does the actual recording up to a few hundred feet away and of course a power supply.
2) Lenses will become cameras in themselves with their own sensor and shutter but no controls until mounted on a body. No more sensor cleaning because it is sealed inside and no more figuring actual focal length for crop and full frame and all of that, the sensors will be round because the image a lens produces is round. Crop what you want later.
3) NO IS, just fast apertures and crazy good high ISO sensors. IS is dead as soon as the higher ISO's make it so.


5D, 10D, G10, the required 100 macro, 24-70, 70-200 f/2.8, 300 f2.8)
Looking through a glass un-yun

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,130 views & 0 likes for this thread, 44 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
It's 2020 (God help us) and you go to the camera store for a new camera
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2267 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.