Do you sell Micro Stock

Simple yes or no. Don't bash anyone or give any explanations just answer the poll.
If you want to debate it go here, https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=729755

Where's the never have and never will option?

Um, that would be a NO. Remember I kept it simple, yes or no.

There is no "considering it".

I'm on the fence at the moment. I was against it strongly. Then last month I heard an interview with Rich Legg who makes his living off of microstock. He makes enough to pay for the studio, pay the models, rent locations if needed, pay hair/makeup, transportation costs, equipment rentals, and everything else he may need, with enough left over to pay for the house, car, and live off of. All of his projects are self assignments. There is no customer to foot the bill. And has sold over 75,000 images.

I doubt I will ever do it like that, but some side money from it may be nice.

Funny thing is ^ if he went with trad. stock he would've made 10x as much !

Mine falls in the middle. I used to, but for the last 2 years I've been free of micro.

i'm holding out for nanostock.

Karl Johnston wrote in post #8436562
Funny thing is ^ if he went with trad. stock he would've made 10x as much !

Not necessarily true. That assumes every image sold would also have sole at a normal price. So while he may have made 10X as much for each image. He would have sold 10% of them. And then only sold each of them once. With microstock resale is common.