Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 24 Jan 2003 (Friday) 00:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ixus V3 for a better result

 
Voltus ­ V
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Jan 24, 2003 00:18 |  #1

Dear all,

I have a question, please help me.

I just bought an Ixus V3 and it's really exciting for me. I still using standard CF 16 MB.
Every time I took a picture always use L (Large) and S (Super Fine). I printed it at the nearest photo store near my house and always make it to 4R. If I change from L to M1 (Medium1) or M2 (Medium2) or S(Small) but the compression still using S (Super Fine), will it take effect to the result if we print it to 4R or it's still better use the L (Large) one, because the L use the memory much more then the 3 other size.

Thanks Pal.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
henkbos
Senior Member
923 posts
Joined Jun 2002
     
Jan 24, 2003 01:48 |  #2

Pal,

New camera, lot of buttons and settings, lots of questions (like what is 4R?). I suggest you take a picture with all settings of the same subject(s) and print them. Then compare the results and choose the one you like best. I would always go fo the largest with the least compression.

Good luck.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Voltus ­ V
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Jan 24, 2003 19:20 |  #3

Hi Henk,

Thanks for the answer, 4 R means the size of the picture as the same as the size of postcard.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
henkbos
Senior Member
923 posts
Joined Jun 2002
     
Jan 25, 2003 00:04 |  #4

Voltus,

Think you will hardly see the difference on that format, but what happens if you have a great shot and want an A4 on the wall? Stick to the largest format!

Henk




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndreyD
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Jan 29, 2003 03:15 |  #5

I found for myself, after I did several test shots with my v3 that it's better to to use Large format and Fine compression (saves a lot of space in you flash card) but you do not have visual difference when you print in 300 dpi.


Andrey
Moscow, Russia
flickr (external link)|blogger (external link)|facebook (external link)|livejournal (external link)|project365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Voltus ­ V
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Jan 29, 2003 20:16 |  #6

Thanks AndreyD for the reply,

But I don't know how much dpi that usually the photo store use to print my photo.
I think that is more than 300 dpi, is it correct? Then I should use the largest and superfine to make a better result. Is it correct?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndreyD
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Jan 30, 2003 01:59 |  #7

AndreyD wrote:
I found for myself, after I did several test shots with my v3 that it's better to to use Large format and Fine compression (saves a lot of space in you flash card) but you do not have visual difference when you print in 300 dpi.

I've heard several times that human eye not really see better then 300 dpi. And this is usially standart for printing pictures in general lab (in deziners lab they probably do more dpi).
So it means that to get targeted 300 dpi you will get this formats:
1051õ1500 - 9x13
1205õ1795 - 10x15
1500õ2102 - 13x18
1795õ2598 - 15Õ21
2398õ3602 - 20Õ30
2398õ3000 - 20x25
First numbers - resolution in camera (i.e. 1051x1500)
and corresponding picture format (sorry it's in santimeters)
With this formats you will prit exellent picture quality.


Andrey
Moscow, Russia
flickr (external link)|blogger (external link)|facebook (external link)|livejournal (external link)|project365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndreyD
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Jan 30, 2003 02:02 |  #8

And again, never heard in digital labs here in Moscow that they do more then 300 dpi, not only if you doing business with glossy magazines.


Andrey
Moscow, Russia
flickr (external link)|blogger (external link)|facebook (external link)|livejournal (external link)|project365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Voltus ­ V
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Jan 30, 2003 18:59 |  #9

Thanks a lot, it seems you're reaalt a pro.
So, what do you think for general conclusion for Ixus V3?
Is it a very good camera or just a common camera?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndreyD
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Jan 31, 2003 02:40 |  #10

I am really new for digital photography but have an extensive experience with conventional cameras.
v3 is my first and it took couple of weeks and extensive discussions with my friends and in Internet to decide what to buy.
Finally I took v2 from my colleague for a weekend to play with it and I made a decision :-)
Several factors:

1. The design, size and how it feels in hands, metal case - this is unbelievable, you just want to take it with you everywhere and it's easy to do, it's so small! Will be convenient especially during my upcoming vacation trip.

2. The quality. I am not going to spend much time trying to print large pictures, or doing some miracles with artistic design and so on .... I just need quality 10x15 or 13x18 pictures (if I will print some of them) and v3 do a very good job with it! Surprisingly it has a lot of settings, which you can alter manually, exposure, long shutter speed, white balance, some effects, very accurate artificial intelligence auto focus (which you can switch off, the same principle with exposure control, exposure and focus locking possibilities, and so on and so forth ... very intelligent and very small camera. So far I love it!
I did several test pictures in a digital lab to find out if I notice different compression on print pictures. With 256 megabyte card you can shoot about 151 Big Superfine (biggest size and lowest compression) pictures, if you change to Big Fine (Biggest Size and moderate compression) – 270 – this is a difference and it will be convenient for me for a two weeks vacation (do not want to buy additional CF card now). So the result – I did not noticed quality changes when printed in the same format Big Superfine and Big Fine pictures.


Andrey
Moscow, Russia
flickr (external link)|blogger (external link)|facebook (external link)|livejournal (external link)|project365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Voltus ­ V
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
18 posts
Joined Jan 2003
     
Feb 02, 2003 19:32 |  #11

AndreyD thanks a lot.

Hope you have a nice vacation trip.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palendrone
Member
Avatar
98 posts
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Warwickshire, UK
     
Feb 04, 2003 20:00 |  #12

I just got back a 12X8 print of a macro shot i took on my Ixus v3 and it is great ! no loss of quality what so ever !

Shame i cant say that about the rest i ordered !

5 1/2 weeks to arrive from Max Speilman online order in the UK ! and there rubbush quality ! Good job they did them for free after i complained about the delay ! Wait till i ring em up 2moz and ask for another set as there all too dark except for 4 of em !

I use Max settings as i got a 256 CF card and norm get about 150 - 160 on it at full spec ! Like is sed above use max and you can always downgrade em in art package as you cant do the opposite with them !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AndreyD
Senior Member
Avatar
708 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Moscow, Russia
     
Feb 05, 2003 02:23 |  #13

I should say that this is a general problems for now in almost all digital labs. No guarantee that you will get something good. Sometimes it darker, sometimes too bright, sometimes colors are wrong ... the general advice I've heard - try different ones, do a test pictures and use them. And better be there personally, operator, which prepare you pics for printing have to show any corrections he does with your pictures (if any) or listen to your advices.


Andrey
Moscow, Russia
flickr (external link)|blogger (external link)|facebook (external link)|livejournal (external link)|project365 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,578 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Ixus V3 for a better result
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1363 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.