Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 13 Aug 2009 (Thursday) 14:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Lens or camera?

 
daystar
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:15 |  #1

I have a 300D that I'd love to upgrade to a 30D or 40D but I'd also like to entertain the idea of purchasing a Tamron 17-50mm or 28-75mm. I can only budget for get one item and it would have to be in used condition at that. :) So, what to do? :confused: Would you buy the camera or the lens first?


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:27 |  #2

Lens. Your 300D is still a very capable body, as long as you don't want to shoot fast action (no AI Servo mode). But your kit lens isn't so hot.

As for which of those two lenses to get: I couldn't live with a minimum focal length of 28 mm, so the 17-50 would be my choice. It's supposed to be optically quite good (I've never used one).

I had a 300D before the 30D and I have lots of good pics on the walls from it.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:36 as a reply to  @ number six's post |  #3

I like a photojournalistic/cand​id style.......300D still worthy?


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ sparks
Senior Member
287 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NW Indiana
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:37 as a reply to  @ number six's post |  #4

The Tamron's come up pretty cheap used (my next purchase) quite often. Next maybe sell all your other lenses and put that towards a 70-200 f4 L (unless you're happy with the nifty 250). Both of these lenses would almost make the 300 seem like a new camera. Just a thought.

Dave....


40D, 24-105L, 380EX Speedlight.
Olympus E3, 14-54, 50-200, EC14 and Metz 48 AF-1.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:39 |  #5

daystar wrote in post #8454048 (external link)
I like a photojournalistic/cand​id style.......300D still worthy?

Sure. As long as you're not shooting action. It doesn't focus as quickly as newer cameras, and doesn't have AI Servo except in sports mode.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ sparks
Senior Member
287 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2008
Location: NW Indiana
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:46 as a reply to  @ number six's post |  #6

If the 300D is doing everything you want it to do I would say yes. Glass is always a better upgrade over body. The only reason I would upgrade the body first is if it was limiting me for some reason. If not glass first.

This from a guy who upgraded from a D30 to 40D last year.

Dave....


40D, 24-105L, 380EX Speedlight.
Olympus E3, 14-54, 50-200, EC14 and Metz 48 AF-1.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:49 |  #7

number six wrote in post #8454067 (external link)
Sure. As long as you're not shooting action. It doesn't focus as quickly as newer cameras, and doesn't have AI Servo except in sports mode.

-js

hmmm......can't promise that action won't be a subject - I've got 3 kiddos aged 5 and under - plenty of action around here, lol. I see what you're saying, though.


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Aug 13, 2009 14:50 |  #8

This is one time I am going to go against the grain and vote on a new body. You have a pretty decent lens line up already and the difference between the 300D and the 40D is huge both in features and image quality. For the cost of a 40D these days it will being the most capability and improvement for the $$$.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Aug 13, 2009 15:16 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #9

Ack! I'm still torn. I don't necessairily feel limited right now but I definitely want to grow in photography and am afraid that the 300D will be limited at some point (hopefully sooner than later ;)) but a new lens is always good, too. Decisions, decisions.....


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Todd ­ Lambert
I don't like titles
Avatar
12,643 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 131
Joined May 2009
Location: On The Roads Across America
     
Aug 13, 2009 15:25 |  #10

You really can't go wrong either way... I used a 300D for a LONG time (since the day they came out) and I did a LOT of stuff with just it, the kit lens and a cheap 50mm.

That said, if you can expand you're budget just a bit, you might be able to get a used 30 or 40, which will be quite an improvement over what you have. That's probably the route I'd go.

Your other glass is not bad, and will get a bit of new life with an updated body.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,730 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Aug 13, 2009 15:26 |  #11

daystar wrote in post #8454307 (external link)
Ack! I'm still torn. I.......

Dude/Dudett you got three threads going one from last December looking for input as to what to buy. It's not going to get any more clear and there is not going to be one easy answer. :) So, just get the 40 as was recommended way back in Dec. and the other thread as well. You know you want to. :)


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
daystar
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
589 posts
Likes: 520
Joined Aug 2008
Location: East Coast, US
     
Aug 13, 2009 15:49 |  #12

gjl711 wrote in post #8454387 (external link)
Dude/Dudett you got three threads going one from last December looking for input as to what to buy. It's not going to get any more clear and there is not going to be one easy answer. :) So, just get the 40 as was recommended way back in Dec. and the other thread as well. You know you want to. :)

You are 100% right. I do want the 40D. I just was trying to figure out if it was the smartest move. Frankly, I want it all. lol (And I had totally forgotten about my previous posts :oops:)

Oh, and it's dudette. ;)


Nikon D750 | Nikon D7100 | 85mm 1.8G | 50mm 1.8G | 35mm 1.8G | Tamron 70-200 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AxxisPhoto
Goldmember
Avatar
1,893 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 65
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Aug 13, 2009 15:53 |  #13

Dudette;)

Lens. Get the Tammy 28-75mm(obvious bias!) Your 300D is a fine body.


Web: Erotiklab (external link)(NSFW)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Aug 13, 2009 16:01 |  #14

Todd Lambert wrote in post #8454381 (external link)
That said, if you can expand you're budget just a bit, you might be able to get a used 30 or 40, which will be quite an improvement over what you have.

A 30D or 40D with an 18-55 IS would be a good way to go. The 18-55 IS is a much better lens than your kit 18-55 - optically very sharp, with the nasty flare and chromatic aberration eliminated.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

891 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Lens or camera?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
517 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.