Shot this today with the 17-55mm 2.8 IS. Is that lens flare? What would cause that? and how do I fix it? It was on several of the flower shots today.
SMP_Homer Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 15, 2009 15:58 | #2 UV filter or closeup filter on? EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | Aug 15, 2009 16:01 | #3 Are you talking about the blue lines on the edges of the flower? That's Chromatic Aberration John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
advaitin Goldmember 4,624 posts Gallery: 434 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 877 Joined Jun 2003 Location: The Fun Coast of Florida More info | Aug 15, 2009 16:04 | #4 A bad case of CA, chromatic aberration. Some editing programs like DxO will remove it automatically. Canons to the left, Canons to the right,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 15, 2009 16:05 | #5 There was a UV filter on the lens. Its a cheap Tiffen. This is the first time I've ever noticed this on any of the photos I've taken with it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Depth Senior Member 986 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Norcal/Socal More info | Aug 15, 2009 16:10 | #6 Take the UV filter off and see if it takes a difference (it should). Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kaigler Senior Member 500 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jul 2009 More info | Aug 15, 2009 16:18 | #7 That is a $1,000 lens. One lesson I learned the hard way was not to use cheap filters. Canon 5D Mk III - Canon 24-105 f/4 L IS, Sigma 85 f/1.4, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS, Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LostShootingStar Goldmember 1,005 posts Joined Jun 2007 More info | Aug 15, 2009 16:22 | #8 Kaigler wrote in post #8465475 That is a $1,000 lens. One lesson I learned the hard way was not to use cheap filters. Yup, a bad filter can turn the best lens' into the worst
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gasrocks Cream of the Crop 13,432 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA More info | Aug 15, 2009 17:15 | #9 Learning to focus correctly will help a lot. Of all the lenses I own, 17-55 is not one I'd grab for "macro" work. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 15, 2009 17:42 | #10 gasrocks wrote in post #8465774 Learning to focus correctly will help a lot. Of all the lenses I own, 17-55 is not one I'd grab for "macro" work. well, this is a crop of the overall image, but I agree with you. I'd love to have a macro lens, but it hasn't magically appeared in my bag yet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1378 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||