I appreciate any suggestions for a monopod to be used with a 300 2.8 lens and a 20d body. Hopefully some day I can move up to a 500 f4 also. Thanks.
John 20d, gitzo and stuff
johnohio Senior Member 885 posts Likes: 75 Joined Aug 2005 More info | Aug 16, 2009 13:13 | #1 I appreciate any suggestions for a monopod to be used with a 300 2.8 lens and a 20d body. Hopefully some day I can move up to a 500 f4 also. Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jhom Goldmember 1,320 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Aug 16, 2009 13:57 | #2 My choice was a Gitzo GM5540 for my 300. Now that I've moved up to a 400, the 5540 even makes more sense. It is expensive but well worth it. It is the best monopod I've used. Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NYPhotog Member 228 posts Joined May 2009 Location: New York, NY More info | Aug 16, 2009 14:07 | #3 +1 on the Gitzo (the current model is the 5541).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 16, 2009 14:13 | #4 Jim - I appreciate your quick response. 5541 is what I've been looking at. Nice to hear from someone who has one. Like I said, someday, I would like to move up to a 400 or 500, so this one makes sense. Thanks again.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 16, 2009 14:27 | #5 johnohio wrote in post #8469470 I appreciate any suggestions for a monopod to be used with a 300 2.8 lens and a 20d body. Hopefully some day I can move up to a 500 f4 also. Thanks. John 20d, gitzo and stuff I own and use two different monopods. See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 16, 2009 22:11 | #6 RPCrowe - Thanks very much for all the information. That's the kind of stuff I was looking for. I appreciate all the detail and the links. The 681 is one that I've been looking at, very affordable but should still carry the weight that I need. It's nice to hear from someone who uses that one. The other one I'm thinking of is the Gitzo 5541 (I think that's the number). HUGE difference in price. I know it's not comparing apples to apples but the 681 could be a temporary solution or at least give me a chance to try it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jhom Goldmember 1,320 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Dallas, TX More info | Aug 16, 2009 23:40 | #7 johnohio wrote in post #8471646 RPCrowe - Thanks very much for all the information. That's the kind of stuff I was looking for. I appreciate all the detail and the links. The 681 is one that I've been looking at, very affordable but should still carry the weight that I need. It's nice to hear from someone who uses that one. The other one I'm thinking of is the Gitzo 5541 (I think that's the number). HUGE difference in price. I know it's not comparing apples to apples but the 681 could be a temporary solution or at least give me a chance to try it. Thanks again for your response and all the info. John 20d, gitzo and stuff The 681 is a good inexpensive monopod that should serve well. I had one before moving up to the 5540. The 5540 is in a different class. Once you use it with the big teles, you will appreciate the difference. Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 21, 2009 21:30 | #8 Thanks to everybody who responded. Just received my new Gitzo 5541 today. Looks and feels GREAT! I get to use it for the first time tomorrow morning.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1312 guests, 190 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||