Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 16 Aug 2009 (Sunday) 17:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Some 24-70 questions

 
Mick ­ Emmett
Goldmember
Avatar
2,730 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kippax, Nr Leeds,Yorkshire, England
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:20 |  #1

I'm going to put my 100-400 up for sale or perhaps straight trade for a 24-70, a friend of mine's son has lent me his 24-70 to try before I take the plunge. The pictures are lovely and sharp but I've found that it zooms from 70 to 24 (lens extended) as smooth as silk but when I then go back from 24 it's as though there is some sort of spring loaded detent that has to be overcome before the lens will move back in. Is this normal or are they usually as smooth going both in and out ? That seems like a strange phenomenon as well, it zooms in by retracting the lens and zooms back out by extending the lens :rolleyes:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,393 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:23 |  #2

Mick Emmett wrote in post #8470439 (external link)
I'm going to put my 100-400 up for sale or perhaps straight trade for a 24-70, a friend of mine's son has lent me his 24-70 to try before I take the plunge. The pictures are lovely and sharp but I've found that it zooms from 70 to 24 (lens extended) as smooth as silk but when I then go back from 24 it's as though there is some sort of spring loaded detent that has to be overcome before the lens will move back in. Is this normal or are they usually as smooth going both in and out ? That seems like a strange phenomenon as well, it zooms in by retracting the lens and zooms back out by extending the lens :rolleyes:

yes, it's normal.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vad
Member
57 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:25 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Most lenses and 24-70 is not exception move the lens groups differently when zooming. My 24-70 require some effort to move it from the extreme point. If you look at for example 17-55 the zoom action is even stranger. In the middle of zoom the lens need to start moving a different lens group and it feels like the lens stcuk. So not worry - this is normal.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Marloon
Goldmember
4,323 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC.
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:25 |  #4

Yes it's normal. Nuff said.


I'm MARLON

Former Canon Platinum CPS member

5DII • 24L • 35L • 50L • 85L • 135L • 200LIS

Wordpress Blog (external link)Youtube Channel (external link)Twitter (external link)Gear List (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wickerprints
"Shooting blanks"
Avatar
864 posts
Joined Jul 2009
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:27 |  #5

I don't know about the "spring-loaded" action as you describe, but consider the "reversed" design (wide = full extension) a feature. It is really a clever design and it's a shame more zooms don't use it. The advantage is that the lens hood becomes useful at all focal lengths, not just the widest length. The hood's position is fixed and the lens retracts or extends in such a way as to match the shading provided by the hood throughout the focal length range.


5DmkII :: EF 24-105/4L IS :: EF 85/1.8 :: EF 70-200/2.8L IS :: EF 100/2.8L IS macro (coming soon!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mick ­ Emmett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,730 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kippax, Nr Leeds,Yorkshire, England
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:31 |  #6

Thanks for the quick reply ED, seems a little odd to me. If I hold the camera so the lens is pointing straight up then it's smooth both in and out with no resistance either way. It just feels like something is worn but If yours does it as well; then I'll take it as normal.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
robbug
Member
Avatar
212 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:37 as a reply to  @ Mick Emmett's post |  #7

My particular copy is smooth in both directions with no more effort to zoom in or out. If you notice a difference in resistance then there might be an issue with that copy. I am holding mine right now to make sure that there isn't some minor tactile feel to the zoom ring....nope - smooth both directions in all attitudes. At the very end there is a minor increase in force required to "set" the lens. When I say minor I am saying I had to really really pay attention to how much effort I was using.

Rob


Refractive Photos (external link)
Stuff that gets me the exposure
When asked if there were too many people taking pictures today, Elliot Erwitt replied, "All you need is a pencil and a piece of paper to write a novel, don't you?"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mick ­ Emmett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,730 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kippax, Nr Leeds,Yorkshire, England
     
Aug 16, 2009 17:42 |  #8

Thanks for the replies, once it starts to retract it's smooth the rest of the way in; there just seems to be a little extra resistance at the start. Seems to be normal from what others here are saying.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobertZ
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Jun 2009
     
Aug 16, 2009 20:06 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

Mick Emmett wrote in post #8470439 (external link)
I'm going to put my 100-400 up for sale or perhaps straight trade for a 24-70, a friend of mine's son has lent me his 24-70 to try before I take the plunge. The pictures are lovely and sharp but I've found that it zooms from 70 to 24 (lens extended) as smooth as silk but when I then go back from 24 it's as though there is some sort of spring loaded detent that has to be overcome before the lens will move back in. Is this normal or are they usually as smooth going both in and out ? That seems like a strange phenomenon as well, it zooms in by retracting the lens and zooms back out by extending the lens :rolleyes:

You should sell the 100-400 and buy a new 24-70 instead of trading. The 100-400's value used is about the same as the 24-70 new. It will also allow you to send it back if it's not a "good copy". Plus you get the warranty.


5D MK II I Prime Trinity I Zoom Trinity
SALES FEEDBACK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikekelley
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
Avatar
7,317 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Aug 16, 2009 20:50 |  #10

Mine also has different amounts of resistance at different points.

I think that there is just a lot of glass moving...it's heavy stuff!


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography (external link)
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture (external link)
My Fine Art Galleries (external link)
My articles at Fstoppers.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bear ­ Dale
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,868 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 744
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Aug 16, 2009 21:02 |  #11

Mick Emmett wrote in post #8470439 (external link)
I'm going to put my 100-400 up for sale

Not happy with it?


Cheers,
Bear Dale

Some of my photos featured on Flickr Bear Dale (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mick ­ Emmett
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,730 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Kippax, Nr Leeds,Yorkshire, England
     
Aug 17, 2009 02:01 |  #12

ConDigital wrote in post #8471274 (external link)
Not happy with it?

I'm happy with it's IQ and the IS is fantastic but I simply don't use it, I bought it for Air Shows but I've lost interest in them now. If you're thinking of getting one and do longish shots I would recommend this lens, although I must say I'm not a fan of it's push/pull zoom action.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,139 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Some 24-70 questions
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1312 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.