Has anyone already figured out where the nodal point is for 16-35mm f/2.8L (first gen) at 16mm? Thanks! -alex
rent Senior Member 651 posts Likes: 39 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Irvine, CA More info | Aug 18, 2009 23:59 | #1 Has anyone already figured out where the nodal point is for 16-35mm f/2.8L (first gen) at 16mm? Thanks! -alex http://portfolio.alexjiang.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GPFocussed Senior Member 584 posts Joined Jan 2009 Location: Canada More info | Aug 19, 2009 00:15 | #2 rent wrote in post #8484553 Has anyone already figured out where the nodal point is for 16-35mm f/2.8L (first gen) at 16mm? Thanks! -alex The lens' nodal point will also depend on what camera body you have attached. Here is a link that should help you determine yours with a simple excercise: [URL="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/Gear List"][URL="http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showpost.php?p=9541640&postcount=2194"]Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 19, 2009 00:21 | #3 GPFocussed wrote in post #8484620 The lens' nodal point will also depend on what camera body you have attached. Here is a link that should help you determine yours with a simple excercise: http://dgrin.smugmug.com/gallery/2114189 thanks. i am aware of the procedure; but on the 16-35 it's quite elusive. http://portfolio.alexjiang.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MarkVuleta Goldmember More info | Aug 19, 2009 04:38 | #4 rent wrote in post #8484640 thanks. i am aware of the procedure; but on the 16-35 it's quite elusive. -alex Not sure what you mean by "elusive" but that is the procedure you require. The targets used in the posted link are quite large (as in width) but are easy to see.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
argyle Cream of the Crop 8,187 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2007 Location: DFW, Texas More info | ...and unless you have very close foreground objects in your composition, setting the nodal point would not be necessary. "Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son". - Dean Wormer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Aug 19, 2009 07:12 | #6 The target table is not a requirement when setting up the position of the camera/lens to pivot at the nodal point of the lens. All that is required for a target is a foreground object and a distant object. When the camera/lens is pivoting at the nodal point, the relationship of the foreground and background objects does not change as the camera/lens is swung from side to side. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeseph "smells like turd" More info | Aug 19, 2009 08:14 | #7 from memory, if you rotate around a point roughly where the red ring is you won't be too far off. some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1361 guests, 136 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||