A few from Cailee's session.
1.
2.
3.
jwwill0 Member 138 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Henderson, KY More info | Aug 20, 2009 18:06 | #1 A few from Cailee's session. 2. 3. ***************
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimlock Goldmember 2,912 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Southern California Origin: Cybertron More info | Aug 20, 2009 18:17 | #2 I think these look awesome. Nice lighting and catchlights. I also enjoy your composition. - Jerry | Zenfolio
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Aug 20, 2009 20:17 | #3 An interesting thought. Even though this is a portrait session of a single person, not one of the photos are in "portrait" orientation. To me a portrait is vertical. 4:5 usually does right for people vs. 3:2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 20, 2009 20:23 | #4 these look great Canon 7d and a Bunch of other sh*t
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 20, 2009 20:26 | #5 Grimlock wrote in post #8495549 I think these look awesome. Nice lighting and catchlights. I agree. These are great. I don't always agree with the "portrait" mode. Sometimes the negative space works and I think these work. Name: Theron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotoTails Senior Member 559 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Aug 20, 2009 20:30 | #6 I think you did a great job the lighting is spot on. I like that there not all centered. EOS 50d + Grip - Canon 70-200 f/2.8 IS Canon 2x teleconverter - Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 Bogen Tri-pod
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for the replies. Here's another from this session. ***************
LOG IN TO REPLY |
advaitin Goldmember 4,624 posts Gallery: 434 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 877 Joined Jun 2003 Location: The Fun Coast of Florida More info | Aug 20, 2009 20:57 | #8 Negative space? Dead space by another name. It's a trend popular at the moment. many recent grads of my old school follow the practice, so I'm sure there's some academic seminar behind it. You see it once or twice it is an interesting take on portraiture, you see it a bunch of times by different people from different regions, it's a copycat fad. Canons to the left, Canons to the right,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phamster Cream of the Crop 6,315 posts Likes: 51 Joined Apr 2008 Location: Purdue - Go Boilers More info | Aug 20, 2009 21:07 | #9 ^^^ ha ha.. funny.. Grumpy... "Lighting will make or break your photo"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
big.tater Member 164 posts Joined May 2007 Location: Kyle, TX More info | Oddly enough, even though you can't see her whole face something just has me staring at #3. Very nice set. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonyr0584 Senior Member 844 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Mississippi More info | Aug 20, 2009 22:20 | #11 Hey Josh.... I'm sure she will be pleased with these. http://www.trphotography.net
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shaunpete Member 35 posts Joined Nov 2008 Location: Lyman Utah More info | Aug 20, 2009 23:47 | #12 tonyr0584 wrote in post #8496721 Hey Josh.... I'm sure she will be pleased with these. A few things I think would make these even better. 1> All three of the first set are broad lit. She looks great but the light will flatter her more if you short light her next time. Such as the last shot you posted. 2> #2 pic in the first series.... I would try to position her arm a little differently. Cutting off both the elbow and hand makes it look a little strange. (I cut off elbows and hands all the time....so I can't say much) 3> I like the negative space.... I use it all the time. I would have had just a little less on the first shot. Again these are very good and of course everyone has their own way of shooting. Good Job!! Could someone please explain to me what he means by "broad lit and short lit" thanks... By the way, I really like the pics. Uh... pictures are cool!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 21, 2009 07:36 | #14 If the person has their face turned off center to the camera so that you see more cheek than the other, the side you see more of the cheek is the broad side, the other is the short side. Typically in photography, the most flattering lighting patterns are ones that have the light coming from the same side as the way the face it pointing, which causes the light to naturally fall off the 'broad' side. If you light from the broad side (most apparent in my first photo), it can make the face appear wider than it is. You can get away with it on people with narrow faces (sometimes it's preferred if their face is very narrow to make have a more round face appearance, or can help with reflections if they wear eyeglasses). If you look at my last picture above, the light is coming from the side that the face it pointing, which causes the face to look more narrow (usually the most flattering). You would definitely not want to broad light someone with a heavier or wider face, as that could draw more attention to it. Compare how the light hits my first pic and last pic above. Here is one more example of the more traditional 'short' lighting. Again, compare to the first image for the most apparent difference. ***************
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BeritOlam Goldmember 1,675 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Deep in the Heart of Texas More info | Aug 21, 2009 07:39 | #15 I think 3 is the most eye-grabbing of the bunch. Hard to pull off well....but I like it. The 1st and 4th portrait are nice as well. Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 984 guests, 177 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||