Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 23 Aug 2009 (Sunday) 08:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Blown out sky

 
Nancy
Member
88 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Aug 23, 2009 08:18 |  #1

I would really like some help on how to fix the blown out sky in this picture. (I have both LR & CS2. I have surfed the net and have tried several tutorials but none of them have sufficed. I think the reason is because of all of the leaves and branches in the background. Any and all help would be truly appreciated.
Nancy


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nemo ­ man
Senior Member
785 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 23, 2009 08:27 |  #2

I have sort of fixed it, but you don't allow edits to be posted. In RAW editor the sky is all red on the clipping.

The main problem is not 'fixing it' but ensuring that the shot was not blown in the first place. That is, get the exposure correct at time of shooting. The composition of the family group is very good, but it's spoilt by the sky.


http://carregwenimages​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Aug 23, 2009 08:31 |  #3

The sun seems to be almost directly overhead, which is said to be the worst time of day for photography, and this picture would seems to bear that out.

I acknowledge that you would light to save the picture with processing, and some expert will undoubtedly be able to offer some suggestions besides the obvious one of the Highlight/Shadow tool in PSCS4.

In the future, look for open shade instead of direct sunlight, and since this was a posed shot, concentrate on evaluating everything you see in the viewfinder at the time of capture and also when reviewing the shot in playback. The histogram display highlight alert would surely be blinking all over that scene.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dolfinack
Senior Member
Avatar
415 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Belfast, Northern Ireland (Our wee country)
     
Aug 23, 2009 09:32 |  #4

A simple way for that shot be taken would be to expose properly for the background, then add some flash to illuminate the folks. I realise that doesen't quite help you now, but its something handy to know about.

For now... you could try to fix it using CS2, I guess, by making two copies of the same picture, one less exposed than the other, then layer them one on top of the other and erasing away one layer until the image looks right, but that would be fiddly. Shame not to try it though, any improvements would be good, its such a nice pic.

If you had CS4 you could use the alterations brush to very simply isolate the background and try to save whatever detail lurks in the RAW file...

Turning on Image Editing OK will get you some examples of how it could be done, as Nemo Man said above.


Me flickr (external link) Canon 40D | 17-40L | Canon 18-55mm IS | Tamron 55-200mm Di II | Nifty Fifty Canon 50mm 1.8 ii and a big cheapo tripod thingy. Cokin P filter system. 430ex ii Speedlite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nemo ­ man
Senior Member
785 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 23, 2009 10:09 |  #5

dolfinack wrote in post #8508471 (external link)
If you had CS4 you could use the alterations brush to very simply isolate the background and try to save whatever detail lurks in the RAW file...

That is what I did. It's probably the best you can do for a fix. Agree about the flash. If there was no other suitable backdrop then flash would be good as no shadow should have been cast from the people. And there are some shadowy areas around the lady's neck/eyes that would have been evened out.


http://carregwenimages​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nancy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
88 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Aug 23, 2009 13:34 |  #6

Image editing is now on...thanks for your help
Nancy




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nemo ­ man
Senior Member
785 posts
Joined Nov 2008
     
Aug 23, 2009 13:46 as a reply to  @ Nancy's post |  #7

Thanks, Nancy.

The shot would have been helped in-camera by choosing a better back-drop, or using fill flash, as has already been said. I edited the posted shot in CS4 RAW editor (ACR). I used the brush tool to selectively darken the sky. You can see the difference, and the branches now have more detail. The brush tool and grad tool are very good, but only available in CS4 and Lightroom (I think). You could have used a wider aperture (f/4) to blur the background detail which is a bit intrusive, IMO.

I also cropped the shot. If you have part of a shot that is unwanted the best option is often to get rid of it! I think the crop adds to the shot compositionally as it makes it more intimate, and being a family shot that seems to be appropriate. Sorry if you don't like it.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

http://carregwenimages​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,138 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Blown out sky
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
776 guests, 144 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.