Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Aug 2009 (Friday) 16:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

24-70mm backfocusing and sharpness UX copy

 
sdsviet
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: chicago
     
Aug 28, 2009 16:37 |  #1

it seems that my copy seems to be backfocusing on 24mm wide open. just recently purchased this from a member here. cool guy. i dont think he know but who knows. im just glad its a UX copy so i can send it in to canon if i have to. here are some test i took today. they arent like any hardcore test or anything so if u guys have better suggestions pls let me know. i specifically center focus on the word "perfectly" in that sentence on both images. also if u guys can comment on its sharpness. seems its decently sharp at 70mm but 24mm seems a little soft.

70mm @2.8

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


70 @2.8 100% cropped
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


24 @2.8
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


24 @2.8 100%cropped
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

| EOS 5D | EOS 40D | 24-70mm F2.8L | 85mm F1.8 | 580EX II w/Stofen | Sunpak RD2000 |
| My Blog (external link)|Ebay Feedback (external link)|Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeff81
Goldmember
Avatar
1,698 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Dec 2008
Location: SLC, UT
     
Aug 28, 2009 16:43 |  #2

Someone else with more knowledge can chime in, but from what I've read about the lens it seems this is a somewhat common occurrence. Good thing is it also sounds like those that have had the problem were able to get it fixed by canon. Good luck. :)

Check out this thread for a discussion of it: https://photography-on-the.net …?t=743396&highl​ight=24-70. I think it was toward the end of the thread.


R6/6D | Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Samyang 24 f/1.4, Sigma 50 f/1.4 Art, Canon 85 f/1.8, Canon RF 70-200 L f/2.8 IS
Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdsviet
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: chicago
     
Aug 28, 2009 16:48 |  #3

yea i understand that it is also but it seems like canon is either not caring about their QC or they dont want to fix the issues with the method they are making these lenses. this is a UX copy so i figured they figured it out by now but i guess not.


| EOS 5D | EOS 40D | 24-70mm F2.8L | 85mm F1.8 | 580EX II w/Stofen | Sunpak RD2000 |
| My Blog (external link)|Ebay Feedback (external link)|Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Aug 28, 2009 16:52 |  #4

Unfortunately, with the way you positioned the focus test chart, this is not a very valid test. You really need to make sure the focus test chart is resting on a flat surface, your camera needs to be on a heavy enough tripod, MLU has to be enabled, and a remote switch (or the timer, set to 10 sec) is required to activate the camera. Furthermore, you should enable the centre AF point only for this test.

Furthermore, you need to make sure th ecamera is aligned perfectly with the test chart according to the instructions that come with it. This includes focusing on the fat black line with "Focus here" inscribed. The text you focused on is just not good enough fo this test, considering the size of the AF sensors.

Regardless of all this, and having doen a zillion of these tests (ok, slight hyperbole, but quite a lot regardless :D), I would say your lens is fine, and a proper test will prove that. Unless you notice problems when shooting real life photographs, don't even bother with this test, I'd suggest.

A final word: this test was not designed for a Canon AF system. According to Canon literature you need a vertical rather than a horizontal focus bar for correct focusing assessments. Furthermore, the focusing point shoudl really be at approximately 50X the focal length of the lens used, i.e., 1.2 m (4 ft) at 24 mm, and 3.5 m (11 ft 8 inches) at 70 mm.

HTH, kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Aug 28, 2009 16:54 |  #5

sdsviet wrote in post #8540596 (external link)
yea i understand that it is also but it seems like canon is either not caring about their QC or they dont want to fix the issues with the method they are making these lenses. this is a UX copy so i figured they figured it out by now but i guess not.

I reckon that before you make such comments, you better learn how to carry out tests properly first of all.

This is pure user error. See my other post.

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdsviet
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: chicago
     
Aug 28, 2009 17:00 |  #6

wimg wrote in post #8540620 (external link)
Unfortunately, with the way you positioned the focus test chart, this is not a very valid test. You really need to make sure the focus test chart is resting on a flat surface, your camera needs to be on a heavy enough tripod, MLU has to be enabled, and a remote switch (or the timer, set to 10 sec) is required to activate the camera. Furthermore, you should enable the centre AF point only for this test.

Furthermore, you need to make sure th ecamera is aligned perfectly with the test chart according to the instructions that come with it. This includes focusing on the fat black line with "Focus here" inscribed. The text you focused on is just not good enough fo this test, considering the size of the AF sensors.

Regardless of all this, and having doen a zillion of these tests (ok, slight hyperbole, but quite a lot regardless :D), I would say your lens is fine, and a proper test will prove that. Unless you notice problems when shooting real life photographs, don't even bother with this test, I'd suggest.

A final word: this test was not designed for a Canon AF system. According to Canon literature you need a vertical rather than a horizontal focus bar for correct focusing assessments. Furthermore, the focusing point shoudl really be at approximately 50X the focal length of the lens used, i.e., 1.2 m (4 ft) at 24 mm, and 3.5 m (11 ft 8 inches) at 70 mm.

HTH, kind regards, Wim

i totally understand what you are saying. i just take a couple with a tripod on a table at the right angle but i did not use a shutter release. the results are pretty similar. i just took these really quick because that area was where i had the most natural light. pretty gloomy day today. i will probably take a more complete test later this evening. but yes i havnt actually gotten a chance to use in real life situations yet but i will and let u guys know.


| EOS 5D | EOS 40D | 24-70mm F2.8L | 85mm F1.8 | 580EX II w/Stofen | Sunpak RD2000 |
| My Blog (external link)|Ebay Feedback (external link)|Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Aug 28, 2009 17:15 |  #7

sdsviet wrote in post #8540660 (external link)
i totally understand what you are saying. i just take a couple with a tripod on a table at the right angle but i did not use a shutter release. the results are pretty similar. i just took these really quick because that area was where i had the most natural light. pretty gloomy day today. i will probably take a more complete test later this evening. but yes i havnt actually gotten a chance to use in real life situations yet but i will and let u guys know.

Please do, before worrying about it.

Do note that at 24 mm it will always resolve less detail (hence may potentially seem or feel softer), for the simple reason that the AoV is much wider and hence that less pixels are available for the same part of the picture as there is at 70 mm. The sensor surface area covered by the same object at 70 mm vs that object at 24 mm from the same shooting point is approx. 9X bigger at 70 mm than at 24 mm, and thus, at 70 mm, will (apparently) show quite a bit more detail and potentially look or feel sharper.

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
garycoleman
Senior Member
450 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2008
Location: California
     
Aug 28, 2009 18:20 |  #8

as I understand, DoF is usually 1/3 front and 2/3 back. so it looks like your lens is operating properly


Canon 5D MKIII | Canon 60D | 24-70mm f/2.8L II | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MS-18E
Member
128 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Aug 28, 2009 18:32 |  #9

wimg wrote in post #8540620 (external link)
Furthermore, the focusing point shoudl really be at approximately 50X the focal length of the lens used, i.e., 1.2 m (4 ft) at 24 mm, and 3.5 m (11 ft 8 inches) at 70 mm.

HTH, kind regards, Wim

Hi Wim,

This focusing distance you are talking about. Are we measuring from camera sensor plane, mid lens length or a certain element within the lens?

Also, what is the best way you've come up with to accurately and consistently setup this distance?

Thanks




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Aug 28, 2009 18:43 |  #10

MS-18E wrote in post #8541125 (external link)
Hi Wim,

This focusing distance you are talking about. Are we measuring from camera sensor plane, mid lens length or a certain element within the lens?

Also, what is the best way you've come up with to accurately and consistently setup this distance?

Thanks

That's 51X the FL from the mark on the camera body next to the flash shoe lower down on the body (the zero with long strike through it), which indicates the position of the film or sensor plane.

It doesn't really have to be exact, approximate is good enough. The reason I indicated this is that many people shoot very close to the focus test chart, and this isn't really the correct way to do it, certainly not according to Canon.

The way to set this up as correct as possible is to align the camera body along a perfectly straight 2X4 or something similar, the focus chart along another one, equal in length (rulers will do too), and measure the distance to the 2X4s (or rulers) at the ends. They should be the same. Alternatively, an electronic measuring device should do the trick too, as long as you make sure the sensor is perfectly parallel to the focusing bar on the above focus test chart.

The distance from the centre of the lens to the focus test chart focusing bar should be positioned in such a way that it is approx. 50X the FL, or the sensor plane mark about 51X.

As long as you don't do MTF-charts, approximate is good enough :D.

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wimg
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,982 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands, EU
     
Aug 28, 2009 18:47 |  #11

garycoleman wrote in post #8541064 (external link)
as I understand, DoF is usually 1/3 front and 2/3 back. so it looks like your lens is operating properly

That's really only true for focusing distance further away, say 100X FL and further. Nearby it is approx. 1/2 - 1/2. However, for F/2.8 lenses it is only accurate for about 1/3 of DoF, so 1/6 - 5/6 either way is within spec, and for slower lenses as long as it is within DoF it is within spec.

You'll find that most lens/body configurations are more accurate than that however, provided the AF-sensor is placed well on a good contrast transition.

Kind regards, Wim


EOS R & EOS 5 (analog) with a gaggle of primes & 3 zooms, OM-D E-M1 Mk II & Pen-F with 10 primes, 6 zooms, 3 Metabones adapters/speedboosters​, and an accessory plague

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdsviet
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
477 posts
Joined Apr 2008
Location: chicago
     
Aug 28, 2009 19:49 |  #12

can u suggest a better method to do this test chart or a link to it. from the instructions i'm reading it was asked of me to take up as much of the test sheet as possible resulting in being really close to the sheet during the 70mm shot.


| EOS 5D | EOS 40D | 24-70mm F2.8L | 85mm F1.8 | 580EX II w/Stofen | Sunpak RD2000 |
| My Blog (external link)|Ebay Feedback (external link)|Twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gte357s
Senior Member
489 posts
Joined Mar 2009
     
Aug 29, 2009 02:12 as a reply to  @ sdsviet's post |  #13

I tested a 24-70 today on my XS, and the result is opposite of yours. It is focus properly on the 24mm, but it is a bit back focus at 70mm, very very similar to what you have posted.

Another strange thing, I tested it on a 50D, it focus accurately at all FLs except 50mm! And again, the result is very similar to what you see, it's just it happens on 50mm.

Can anyone explain why does a lens behave differently on different camera body?


Canon 5D MK I | Canon 24-70 F2.8 L | Canon 70-200 F2.8 L IS I | Sigma 85 F1.4 | Tamron 1.4x TC | Canon 430 EXII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
epatt250
Senior Member
769 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Central, Arkansas
     
Aug 29, 2009 09:32 |  #14

I used that chart just for kicks when I got mine.. I got pretty much identical results as you.. and I used a tripod, MLU, timer, flat 45 degree plane and focused on the correct bar.

So then I did a whole lot of battery tests, which while people drill the battery testers.. is a more effective real world test if done right. Out of 20 or so shots from 24-50mm after defocusing in between each shot, every single one was excellent. Proper battery was always on focus and the others were always blurred the same amount.

Mine has never missed focus in actual real world use, except shooting dark nightclub stuff. I will just stay away from shooting charts and I should be fine. They are boring to shoot anyway.


Gear- Why do you care? If my image is good it's good, if it sucks it sucks. It's most likely my own fault.
www.elipattersonphoto.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jeppoy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,305 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Sep 2009
     
Sep 10, 2009 01:22 as a reply to  @ epatt250's post |  #15

this is so sad....nit picking instead of going out there and using it for what it's intended....sure it's easy to say equipment failure rather than camera user's inability...so sad....so so sad....i guess you can post your chart and we can admire how sharp that piece of sheet is.....:rolleyes:


No I'm not a photographer, I just shoot with Canon DSLR with those lenses with red thingy...;)

www.digital-xpression.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,787 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
24-70mm backfocusing and sharpness UX copy
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1761 guests, 177 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.