Lol here goes the photo critiques.
Why not. Its easy to say yeah that looks great all the time or you post a neg comment without any explanation. If you've work with art directors they rip constantly, its their job. 

airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Feb 10, 2010 08:07 | #6001 Nick VanGorder wrote in post #9580669 Lol here goes the photo critiques. Why not. Its easy to say yeah that looks great all the time or you post a neg comment without any explanation. If you've work with art directors they rip constantly, its their job.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | Feb 10, 2010 08:24 | #6002 Alejandro Sandoval wrote in post #9580655 mmmmmm Yes and no..lol The original Image the eyeshadow area was lighter....Why I made it darker? I've followed the basic rules of Make Up according to the master Kevin Aucoin... her nose shape wasn't the greatest therefore I applied some "digital make up" to contour it Plus her eye shadow area looks is "funny" small and "chubby" so i went for the "smoky" look that way you can cover that "flaw" If you notice ..she has a dominant eye (as everyone) and I did the same with "digital make up" I attempted to correct it. Same goes to the "hot spot" in the forehead I followed the contouring rules of make up "T zone" Can you tell I'm taking make up lessons hahahahahahahahaha thanks for this. if you can, or send me a pm,,interested in this as well. where are you getting the information ?? Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | Mike,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlejandroSandoval Goldmember 2,476 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Feb 10, 2010 08:58 | #6004 I'm totally cool....there are different tastes on each people Twitter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-g- Horribly disfigured but learning to cope 12,520 posts Likes: 32 Joined Dec 2007 More info | airfrogusmc wrote in post #9580556 I have couple of neg comments Alejendro. Sorry..I usually love your stuff. First, the main light is to high for her head tilt (the shadow from her brow line cutting halfway across her pupils). The really hot spot on her forehead and her hair near the top of the frame I find a bit distractive and the eyes cutting the frame in half at the 50% horizon line. A crop just slightly above the eyebrows does help.I would also tone down the skin on her shoulders a bit. I just learned something with this! Then I learned more from Alejandro's reply.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Njv Goldmember 1,858 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Ohio More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:01 | #6006 airfrogusmc wrote in post #9580873 Mike, Ok look at it like this. Either everything in the image is helping the image or hurting it. Tell me how the hair at the top and the hot spot is helping. I feel without those things its a much stronger image. Oh and debating photographs is very good thing and how forums like this function best don't you think? As long as things aren't personal and stick to the image it all good right? We all learn a lil sump'm. Allen I'm not trying to debate anything, but its funny that you brought up the hair. A photographer I know who did a shoot for a school, he set his lights up all differently this past year, well needless to say every parent wanted a re-do because how he had set up his lights brought out all the imperfections in the hair of the children. 7d|tamron 17-50mm f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Njv Goldmember 1,858 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Ohio More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:02 | #6007 Alejandro Sandoval wrote in post #9580905 I'm totally cool....there are different tastes on each people Group Hug! We need a hug smiley, but I fear Geno might use it too often! 7d|tamron 17-50mm f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlejandroSandoval Goldmember 2,476 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:05 | #6008 slowdad wrote in post #9580767 thanks for this. if you can, or send me a pm,,interested in this as well. where are you getting the information ?? and as far as critique goes, i appreciate it when anyone can give me real constructive comments. thats why i post my shots. I know they are not as good as some of the others in here so i welcome peoples input. I want to get better and I love working with studio lighting. its a constant work in progress for me and i enjoy the learning process. so, any tips i can get and/or advise is great. try getting a certified master photographer to give you tips on lighting or let you come in and help for a week so you can improve your skills. its like trying to put your hand in front of a rattlesnake and hoping it wont bite you. ive learned a ton from people on this board and especially on the 5d forum. alejandro, geno, tiffany, and others really have helped with good solid information. i appreciate everyone here and welcome everyones thoughts and tips. Same here man.....I've been brewed in POTN..there are some people that i will be grateful forever (SkipD, TMR...etc etc) Twitter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-g- Horribly disfigured but learning to cope 12,520 posts Likes: 32 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:07 | #6009 Nick VanGorder wrote in post #9580921 We need a hug smiley, but I fear Geno might use it too often! You wouldn't like me when I'm angry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-g- Horribly disfigured but learning to cope 12,520 posts Likes: 32 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:08 | #6010 Alejandro Sandoval wrote in post #9580934 i was put in my place by Ford NY.... lol they woop my butt when they reviewed my book...I'm still sore..... Give me the name and contact number. I'll call them up and set them straight for you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlejandroSandoval Goldmember 2,476 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:11 | #6011 I did this last Sunday aiming to some retro kida stuff Twitter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Njv Goldmember 1,858 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Ohio More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:13 | #6012 Woah thats different, I like it 7d|tamron 17-50mm f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wazzupbeckham Member 152 posts Joined Feb 2007 More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:21 | #6013 i like it tooo I love my 5D, but I want a 550D as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sevillafox I'm good with pathetic! Really, I am. 25,223 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Southwest Wisconsin More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:27 | #6014 Allen, you brought up some good points. I do like it better cropped tighter but you lose some of that pretty backlight in her hair on the left then. Tiffany
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Njv Goldmember 1,858 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Ohio More info | Feb 10, 2010 09:29 | #6015 sevillafox wrote in post #9581058 Allen, you brought up some good points. I do like it better cropped tighter but you lose some of that pretty backlight in her hair on the left then. What really bugs me is that there is one tiny catchlight in one eye and nothing in the other. ALE I like the newest one except for the distortion/light showing caused by the glass in the glasses on the right side of her face (as we are looking at it) And, the socks in the heels....make her legs look kind of fat and stumpy. ![]() But the rest is very nice! [GIFS ARE NOT RENDERED IN QUOTES] 7d|tamron 17-50mm f2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2187 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||