-=5D CLASSIC admirers, assemble! (3)

Cyrix_2k wrote in post #8724827

Not my car. Taken with Sigma 70-200 @ 126, f/2.8, ISO800, 1/80th. No processing other than USM.

One of the best looking cars of all time IMO. Would someone please show this picture to Chris Bangle?

Ingardj wrote in post #8717491
Interesting landscape.. Much to look at. Love the fish

Thanks.

Reinheim wrote in post #8720952
Sunday evening, September 27, 2009

both are awesome.

Lazuka wrote in post #8722133
That's HDR done right sir!

thanks. it's manual blending. Not HDR. I could never achieve good results from HDR so I gave it up long time ago.

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #8722135
Agreed .. Gorgeous!!

Thanks Jay.

Ingardj wrote in post #8723178
Edited on my wide gamut screen :P

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ingardj/3961872​783/

That color is fantastic.

sevillafox wrote in post #8723228
I hate you. Love the shot though!

I am a little disappointed it was not the opposite, but thanks.

illusions wrote in post #8724905

IMAGE LINK: http://img71.imageshac​k.us/i/img0040g.jpg/

I love this shot. Good job.

Ingardj wrote in post #8723178
Edited on my wide gamut screen :P

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ingardj/3961872​783/

That is just... wow! All of your photos are most impressive.

Warming up.

MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

The 70-200 2.8 is a great portrait lens...now I want one!

MIME changed to 'text/html' | Content warning: script

I have finished going through the animal photos and below are a few. I used 5D + 70-200/4IS + 1.4x TC for all of them.

There were only a couple of times in the whole month that I missed not having a longer lens. Considering how light and compact this kit is that sacrifice definitely felt worth it. It would have been different if it had been a pure photography trip though - now I traveled with someone who's not really into photography (but has a never ending patience, fortunately...).

Hmmm... I see now that some of them could have taken a bit of sharpening, but I'm too tired to redo them now.


1 Prairie dog:

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Helena,

Quite different from your usual stuff, aren't they? You did well!

What's with the Bighorns? They almost look almost.

lostid wrote in post #8725294
I am a little disappointed it was not the opposite, but thanks.

*snort*

HELENA love the buffalo shot!

Thank you Geno and Tiffany! It was fun to photograph nature and landscapes for a change. It's too bad that I didn't get a chance to practice before we left, but I'm not unhappy with the results. Sure, they could have been better, but this is the best I can do now (hope to improve over time ), and that is all I demand of myself. I'll post more photos asap.

The two bighorns had a half-hearted fight. Just knocking their heads together lightly. It was funny to watch.

Helena wrote in post #8726303
Thank you Geno and Tiffany! It was fun to photograph nature and landscapes for a change. It's too bad that I didn't get a chance to practice before we left, but I'm not unhappy with the results. Sure, they could have been better, but this is the best I can do now (hope to improve over time ), and that is all I demand of myself. I'll post more photos asap.

The two bighorns had a half-hearted fight. Just knocking their heads together lightly. It was funny to watch.

hahaha, every time helena posts a series, i always get confused by her numbering system. it took me a couple seconds to figure out why i didn't see the other pronghorn deer, the two hidden marmots, and the three other bison in the photos.

i want a beaver as a pet.

alt4852 wrote in post #8726397
hahaha, every time helena posts a series, i always get confused by her numbering system. it took me a couple seconds to figure out why i didn't see the other pronghorn deer, the two hidden marmots, and the three other bison in the photos.

Sorry about that! At the forum where I used to hang out (before I got the DSLR last year) people always asked for numbering, so that it'd be easier to know which photo comments were meant for, so I continued doing it here.

I see what you mean though, especially in this latest post where the format is just

3 bla bla bla:

I'll try and remember to make the numbering more clear in future. Maybe use #, like they do in USA.

Helena wrote in post #8726470
Sorry about that! At the forum where I used to hang out (before I got the DSLR last year) people always asked for numbering, so that it'd be easier to know which photo comments were meant for, so I continued doing it here.

I see what you mean though, especially in this latest post where the format is just

3 bla bla bla:

I'll try and remember to make the numbering more clear in future. Maybe use #, like they do in USA.

Or just put a . after the number

1. bison
2. jackelope
etc.

sevillafox wrote in post #8726537
Or just put a . after the number

1. bison
2. jackelope
etc.

ah, yellowstone's elusive red-tailed jackalope..