I'm losing my tiny little mind.
We know.
LOL
I am for sure getting way less shots out of the 5D than I did with my 40D, but I'm still happy learning. I strive to get it perfect in camera, hence the low keeper rate I guess...

Skrim17 The only TPBMer without a title. Enjoying my anonymity. 40,070 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2006 Location: In my tree More info | cfpackerfan wrote in post #8618886 I'm losing my tiny little mind. short5 wrote in post #8618895 We know. LOL Crissa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thomascanty Bold. Pink.Gone, but not forgotten. 38,071 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2003 Location: Temporarily Retired More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:22 | #3212 puddlepirate44 wrote in post #8619376 I'm not bashing PS at all. I couldn't imagine photography without it. I just want to get to a point in my photography where I can use it if I WANT to, not because I HAVE to. Shooting with a DSLR, I think we have no choice but to use Photoshop, or something similar, to at least sharpen the images a bit. That's about all I do to probably 95% of my photos, other than resizing and slapping my logo on it somewhere. My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dotTif 2009 SMWYG Photog of the Year 3,257 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: waiting to see my Ocean again More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:24 | #3213 puddlepirate44 wrote in post #8619099 OK, here it is. My quarterly serious set of photographic remarks. I'm going to lay it all out on the line here and write out the things that I'm thinking and learning in regards to photography.
-Your Benevolent Duchess of Awesomeness-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
puddlepirate44 Cream of the Crop 29,316 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2006 Location: currently, in my chair. More info | off to vet w/ the Hal-ster. I tend to ramble. Feel free to put me on ignore.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | I think I just found what has to be the most extreme pixel peeping example so far... John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thomascanty Bold. Pink.Gone, but not forgotten. 38,071 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2003 Location: Temporarily Retired More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:26 | #3216 puddlepirate44 wrote in post #8619433 off to vet w/ the Hal-ster. G'luck! My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thomascanty Bold. Pink.Gone, but not forgotten. 38,071 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2003 Location: Temporarily Retired More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:28 | #3217 JWright wrote in post #8619435 I think I just found what has to be the most extreme pixel peeping example so far... https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=8619272&postcount=1 Why do you still waste your time in the gear forums?!? My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dotTif 2009 SMWYG Photog of the Year 3,257 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: waiting to see my Ocean again More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:28 | #3218 I agree! She's a cutie and the light is great! -Your Benevolent Duchess of Awesomeness-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon Cream of the Crop 69,628 posts Likes: 227 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD USA More info | puddlepirate44 wrote in post #8619099 OK, here it is. My quarterly serious set of photographic remarks. I'm going to lay it all out on the line here and write out the things that I'm thinking and learning in regards to photography. As you know, Lisa is starting out in her journey of professional photography. I'm kinda on the sidelines watching this happen, learning as she goes. I just want to relay what I've noticed so far. This does not mean that I'm the all-knowing, experienced photographer with all the answers. These are just my observations. There's a good chance I'll look at this again in two years and scoff uproariously at myself. So, we live in a digital age. Where we can take a photo of something, download it into our computers, tweak the pixels and the 1's and 0's and when we're done, it will look NOTHING like the original. Take a photo and it can be a diamond in the rough, just waiting to be cut and polished. Unfortunately, it has to start out a diamond in order for it to end up as a diamond. Meaning, all the photoshop skills in the world won't help a bad shot. One of the many problems that I see in myself is a laziness that comes from being able to tweak a photo in post processing. Because I can do that, I allow sloppiness to creep into my "shooting protocol". There would be so much less work in post if I would take the time to get the shot right "pre-shutter".
More later. That does it! I'm tired of your wisdom getting lost in the random chatter. I've started tracking "The Sage of Albany" as part of the master TR index. If anyone happens to have bookmarked any of Dan's earlier discourses on the art of photography, let me know so I can add them. Harm wrote in post #8619147 A nice check list, Dan....I am learning the same things via you guys, and the hard way too... Pete wrote in post #8619158 Dead right, Dan... Especially the second point you made. What I try and do is look through the viewfinder and do my best to "see" the end photo. Does what I see through the viewfinder "work" as a photo? Something i'm trying to get the confidence to do is to move things out the way to make the photo more interesting (by removing distracting elements) Examples:- I should have taken the umbrellas away before taking the photo http://www.the-aperture.com …mal/20090903__PER0689.jpg The little sign in the door there would have been easy to ask Ali to take away for a second http://www.the-aperture.com …mal/20090831__PER0611.jpg Both distractions will now be a pain to remove in photoshop. Becky N wrote in post #8619177 It's a ... ^^^ that.. I'll get a... ...link Thanks Cat. ![]() ![]() You won't be disappointed. LINKVery good points. In fact I just remembered, after converting , I have to run some of my Ren shots through Noise Ninja, late day shadows, I had to boost the ISO a bit.Happy lunch hour all. Jon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dotTif 2009 SMWYG Photog of the Year 3,257 posts Joined Jul 2007 Location: waiting to see my Ocean again More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:29 | #3220 Jon wrote in post #8619458 That does it! I'm tired of your wisdom getting lost in the random chatter. I've started tracking "The Sage of Albany" as part of the master TR index. If anyone happens to have bookmarked any of Dan's earlier discourses on the art of photography, let me know so I can add them. My signature has a link to the posts about the photography afflictions, that one was my favorite! -Your Benevolent Duchess of Awesomeness-
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Permagrin High Priestess of all I survey 77,915 posts Likes: 21 Joined Aug 2006 Location: day dreamin' More info | lol Jon! I love "the Sage of Albany". He needs that in his title .. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CrazieCricket Stupid wine.... *kicks box* 15,499 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Seeley Lake, Montana More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:31 | #3222 JWright wrote in post #8619435 I think I just found what has to be the most extreme pixel peeping example so far... https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=8619272&postcount=1 Good grief Paula
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JWright Planes, trains and ham radio... 18,399 posts Likes: 35 Joined Dec 2004 More info | I go there for the entertainment and it gives me something to read when things slow down in here... John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sevillafox I'm good with pathetic! Really, I am. 25,223 posts Likes: 35 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Southwest Wisconsin More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:34 | #3224 JWright wrote in post #8619435 I think I just found what has to be the most extreme pixel peeping example so far... https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=8619272&postcount=1 OMG.....he defintely must have more time than talent. CrazieCricket wrote in post #8619470 Good grief he just takes the joy right out of photography doesn't he?I concur! Tiffany
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thomascanty Bold. Pink.Gone, but not forgotten. 38,071 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2003 Location: Temporarily Retired More info | Sep 10, 2009 13:35 | #3225 JWright wrote in post #8619480 I go there for the entertainment and it gives me something to read when things slow down in here... You have a weird definition for the word "entertainment"! My name is Lonnie, but I answer to Thomas too.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2370 guests, 127 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||