I've owned both and have to say the color and contrast is very close but there is a slight edge on the new L version which seems to require less use of my vibrancy controls in CS4 to bring out the color pop I'm after. That alone wouldn't be enough of a reason to upgrade so its a good thing that the now included IS, nicer bokeh and weather sealing does. Having not to buy the hood separately also doesn't hurt.
I think Canon has a winner here.
Cheers!
ah thanks for your input on this,
it's one of those lens that i don't normally use (or use enough), that's my biggest concern about buying the 100/2.8L , (compared to when I had the 100/2.8)
maybe I just need another camera body =p
thanks






