Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 03 Sep 2009 (Thursday) 20:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Enlargements: prints and 100% on screen

 
AJSJones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,647 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 92
Joined Dec 2001
Location: California
     
Sep 03, 2009 20:21 |  #1

A lot of people have a tendency to print at a preferred original ppi (such as 300 or 240) and see more MP's as producing bigger prints. A similarly large group of people (with probably a large overlap) feel that 100% view on screen is the only way to compare captures from different sensors. A lot of folks who routinely print, don't care about any of this until they see the print :)

What gets lost in this is the increasing degree of enlargement from the original optical image falling on the sensor and revelation of blurs/flaws/user errors/camera shake/technique/AF success etc etc( as well as a redefinition of DoF).

If we take an old "full-frame" 35 mm camera and make an e.g. 8"x12" print from it, we have enlarged the image about 8x. If we print at 300 ppi without resizing/scaling, the following table shows the degree of geometrical enlargement from the original sensor dimensions. Obviously the total MP will determine the actual size of the print, and the format will determine how much cropping occurs, but that's not the issue here :D Imagine a lens on a tripod and a succession of cameras attached to capture an image and then printed as we attempt to compare them.
It's not difficult to see why the full frame sensors (in bold) (as well as the 1D"classic" and D30) are so beloved : they don't get magnified as much, so all those flaws are less obvious.

Comparisons at the same print size mean that values in this table are irrelevant, and the MP count of the sensor will (largely) determine how big a print can be made before it looks inferior to the others in such a comparison. Comparisons on screen at 100% will be comparing "per pixel" quality differences and simultaneously examining the images at different enlargements.

None of these concepts is new and I don't have any axe to grind here, but I've not seen a table like this before, so I thought it might be useful as a reference in discussions on sensor comparisons.

  • Camera_____Enlargement at 300 ppi*
  • (35mm_______________8x​)
  • 1D _______________7.3
  • D30_______________8.1
  • 1Ds_______________9.5
  • 1D2, 5D______________10.4
  • 10D, D60, 1D3, 1Ds2___11.5
  • 20D, 30D, 1Ds3, 5D2___12.5
  • 40D_______________14.8
  • 50D_______________18.1
  • 7D _______________19.3
* multiply by another 3 - 3.5 depending on your monitor to get the enlargement for onscreen view at 100%

My picture galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Daniel ­ Browning
Goldmember
1,199 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, WA
     
Sep 04, 2009 00:05 |  #2

Great post, AJSJones. Thanks. It's amazing how different the magnification is between cameras. Clearly, 100% is not a "level playing field" for comparing cameras with a different pixel size.


Daniel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CJinAustin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,361 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2008
     
Sep 04, 2009 01:25 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

Exactly, here's an example. The 4mp image looks better but it is actually the same 12mp image taken with a G9, just downsized in photoshop.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


- GEAR -
Canon 1Ds Mark V | Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 7D Mark II
50 1.0L IS| 85 1.0L IS | EF 10-1000L f/1.0 IS DO USM | 17-4000L IS | 24-7000L IS | 70-2000L 2.8 IS | Canon G12 | 580EXIII | 430EXIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CJinAustin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,361 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2008
     
Sep 04, 2009 01:34 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

...


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


- GEAR -
Canon 1Ds Mark V | Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 7D Mark II
50 1.0L IS| 85 1.0L IS | EF 10-1000L f/1.0 IS DO USM | 17-4000L IS | 24-7000L IS | 70-2000L 2.8 IS | Canon G12 | 580EXIII | 430EXIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,499 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Enlargements: prints and 100% on screen
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1077 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.