The IV will probably still sell for $3,999. III's $3,699
I think it was originally $4,500.
CALImagery Goldmember 3,375 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2008 Location: O-H More info | Sep 06, 2009 00:42 | #16 dolina wrote in post #8591993 The IV will probably still sell for $3,999. III's $3,699 I think it was originally $4,500. Christian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BobbyCanon Member 54 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: North East UK More info | Sep 06, 2009 05:30 | #17 casey487 wrote in post #8590463 The thing is we are at a critical point in camera technology. The AF system on the MarkIII wasn't steller and I'm wary of buying once used in that regard. And I expect that the MarkIV will have video (go ahead and say it though that I already own a 5dmII with video). I mean the central question here is what will the MarkIV have that would make me wait. Obviously I know you can't answer that. We are always at a critical point in camera technology, always have been, and always will be. It is called progress. Buy the mk iii now, and when the mk iv appears, upgrade if you can afford it. If you cant afford it you still have a brilliant camera in the mk iii. If you don't like what is new in the mk iv, you have saved yourself some money. If you keep waiting until camera technology is not at a critical point, I'm afraid you will have a very long wait on your hands. Just my 2 pence worth of course. Good luck whichever route you choose.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
If you get a used Mk3 it will make you money NOW, fast moving technology makes waiting for the next thing somewhat pointless. Canon 1DsMk2, EOS RP, Canon 17-40 f4L, 24-105 f4.0L ll, Canon 70-300 f5.6L IS , Sigma 85mm f1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tyreman Goldmember 1,085 posts Likes: 9 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Cambridge,Ontario,Canada More info | Sep 06, 2009 08:48 | #19 casey487 wrote in post #8589150 I'm really getting into my prime with photography, especially sports photography. I've just graduated and had access to a Canon 1d Mark III throughout school. I know only have a Canon 5d Mark II, not a bad camera obviously, but not a fast sports camera. I am kind of just looking to test the waters and see what people think about if I should wait till the Mark IV is released or buy a used Mark III. Money is some what a factor, but this is my life so it will be an investment either way. I'm just looking for your thoughts... thanks No I sure wouldn't...get 3 or whatever is your pleasure is. Cambridge, ON.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tyreman Goldmember 1,085 posts Likes: 9 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Cambridge,Ontario,Canada More info | Sep 06, 2009 08:50 | #20 FJ LOVE wrote in post #8589552 invest in glass bodies come and go, personally i like my mark 3 but can't see upgrading for a while That camera is good for quite awhile yet. Cambridge, ON.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2009 16:47 | #21 Bobby Canon wrote in post #8592618 We are always at a critical point in camera technology, always have been, and always will be. It is called progress. You said it best here. I think you make a very good point. $$ is a factor and that's why I asked. If the IV is something crazy brand new (doubt it) then everyone is going to scramble for it. Someone also made a good point about even after they release it, the wait is going to be forever. I think a MarkIII is a good idea now and upgrade when I have some $$ to burn (ie. Never) "I'll be happy to take your picture, you just can't look at the camera."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
zincozinco -Followers of Fidget- 4,420 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: AndalucĂa More info | Sep 06, 2009 16:54 | #22 casey487 wrote in post #8589150 I'm really getting into my prime with photography, especially sports photography. I've just graduated and had access to a Canon 1d Mark III throughout school. I know only have a Canon 5d Mark II, not a bad camera obviously, but not a fast sports camera. I am kind of just looking to test the waters and see what people think about if I should wait till the Mark IV is released or buy a used Mark III. Money is some what a factor, but this is my life so it will be an investment either way. I'm just looking for your thoughts... thanks
Living the life, overexposing...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dolina Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 07, 2009 13:02 | #23 nphsbuckeye wrote in post #8592034 I think it was originally $4,500. With sales tax, probably but Canon's MSRP as published on Dpreview was $3,999. Visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jahled Goldmember 1,498 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2008 Location: North London More info | I suspect the 1D4 will be with us in time for the World Cup for the sports photographers to play with. James
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | Sep 07, 2009 14:04 | #25 I was going to buy a 1D Mark III, but I think I'll wait to see what the 1D Mark IV will be like before I do anything. If your in need of a camera now, then I would go with the 1D Mark III. If you can hold off until next year sometime then I would wait and see what the 1D Mark IV has to offer. Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dolina Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 07, 2009 14:20 | #26 Jahled wrote in post #8599513 I suspect the 1D4 will be with us in time for the World Cup for the sports photographers to play with. *wonders when the World Cup is* Feb 22 onwards Visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeoLeoLeo Member 113 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: London & Surrounding Areas More info | Sep 07, 2009 15:32 | #27 Totally OT, but I just wanna say, Adama, you did a great job; I never doubted your leadership. Not for a second.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nuffi Senior Member 926 posts Joined Nov 2008 More info | Sep 07, 2009 15:55 | #28 Unless you have nigh-infinite funds, you should take your Canon 5d Mark II and shoot sprots with it. See how it performs, see how much you can get out of it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sethultimate Member 212 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Sep 07, 2009 17:17 | #29 I'd get a 1DIIN right now
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beepclick Goldmember 1,850 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Sep 07, 2009 17:33 | #30 casey487 wrote in post #8589150 I'm really getting into my prime with photography, especially sports photography. I've just graduated and had access to a Canon 1d Mark III throughout school. I know only have a Canon 5d Mark II, not a bad camera obviously, but not a fast sports camera. I am kind of just looking to test the waters and see what people think about if I should wait till the Mark IV is released or buy a used Mark III. Money is some what a factor, but this is my life so it will be an investment either way. I'm just looking for your thoughts... thanks Since your life evolves around photography, I would wait for a Mk IV. I don't think it's good time to buy a used Mk III. Even if you end up with a Mk III, you will save money by waiting until the Mk IV comes out, when Mk III's will be cheaper. Gear https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=635450
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1675 guests, 137 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||