I used my 5D with the 24-105 to get these photos of my friend's dog Dexter!
Thanks for checking and c&c welcomed!
#1
#2
elfieh Goldmember  More info | Sep 07, 2009 00:22 | #1 I used my 5D with the 24-105 to get these photos of my friend's dog Dexter! #2 Elfie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
McFluffy Member  52 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | Sep 07, 2009 01:23 | #2 Nice pictures.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheMack Senior Member  445 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Tryon, NC More info | Sep 07, 2009 08:39 | #3 Did you use a texture or are they just a bit grainy/noisy?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
The Mack, Elfie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rhurwitz Member 71 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: Portland, OR More info | Sep 07, 2009 11:48 | #5 Beautiful compositions, but the grain/noise is very noticeable. The noise looks like what I get when my ISO is set too high. Oversharpening or other post-processing steps could also be responsible. It would be instructive to look at the original images to see if the noise was introduced when the picture was taken or as a result of post-processing. Canon 40D | EF-S 17-55 F/2.8 | EF 70-200 F/2.8L IS | EF 85 F/1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Normansmith Hatchling 3 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Lake District UK More info | Sep 07, 2009 11:57 | #6 Great shot's i have two labs at my feet as you read this.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Skrim17 The only TPBMer without a title. Enjoying my anonymity.  40,070 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2006 Location: In my tree More info | Sep 07, 2009 12:05 | #7 ISO was at 500 according to exif, are these heavily cropped? they are nice images, tho I agree that the noise is quite noticeable Crissa
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed."  More info | He's got some graying on his muzzle. He's got some years on him. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 07, 2009 12:46 | #9 RDKirk wrote in post #8599286  He's got some graying on his muzzle. He's got some years on him. The basic noise problem here is caused by underexposure. It looks like the image was lightened in processing, which is why you've got noise in the dog's coat. The exposure needed to be upped a bit to the point that the highlights of the scene were just about to blow out (which would have been easy, given the short dynamic range of this particular scene--there are no very bright tonal areas). That would give you enough exposure in the shadows of the dog's coat to avoid noise. RDKirk, Elfie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1044 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
