carloman wrote in post #8608812
I currently own the 70-200 f4 non is and I am very happy with it so far. My son is starting hockey soon and was hoping to get away with this lens but from reading other posts, that may no be the case. I was considering the 70-200 2.8 but will that even be enough? Should I go with a prime? I own a 30D and 5D2 and also have the 580EX. Any input is appreciated, thanks!
I shoot hockey with a 100 f2 and find that for the darker rinks I am below f2.8. That being said, I would "make do" with a 70-200 f2.8 just fine if I had one (I have shot games with a borrowed one).
You won't find the 580EX to be very useful since you'll probably want a shutter speed faster than the synch speed. For 11-year olds, I needed at least 1/400 s, preferably faster, but if your kid is younger you might be able to get away with slower speeds.
For kids hockey, where you'll be standing at the glass, I would say that 300 mm is too long, even on your 5D. Even with 100 mm on my XSi, I miss some potentially good shots because I can't fit enough of the ice in for context.