Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 09 Sep 2009 (Wednesday) 09:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Testing Glass Strength

 
c0r3y.aF
Member
64 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Rhode Island, US
     
Sep 09, 2009 09:50 |  #1

I've been wanting to shoot paintball for a while now, but I've been afraid of taking a direct hit to the lens and ruining it. I'm 18 with a low-paying job and can't afford to buy new glass, so it's risky for me.

My father owns two old Minolta film SLRs that he no longer uses and I decided to take one of the lenses for a test run, but not by taking pictures... I wanted to test the strength of the lens to see if it would hold up to a direct hit.

Figured I'd share since this is both paintball-related and photography-related.

Before:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

The lens: An old Minolta 50mm prime, no scratches or anything, just a little old and dusty.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

The gun: A G3 shooting at 300fps, the same speed most fields shoot at. The shot was taken at a distance of 15-20ft.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

The placement: Stuck it in a little notch on a tree stump, holds nicely. I've tested filters there as well which is why there's paint on it already.

After:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

As you can see, the lens took a direct hit, with no cracks or breaks. The front element held up perfectly.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

After washing (all I did was run it under water in the sink, it won't ever be used again so why not) you can see that there are no cracks, just a smear from my terrible cleaning job. It's simply oils from the paint and water that can be smeared around with your finger and can be cleaned off.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


tl;dr: A hit to the filter will make it basically explode, scratching your lens, but a hit to the bare lens at 15-20ft at 300fps will most likely not do any damage at all to the lens.

Canon t3i, Sigma 17-50 f2.8, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, Canon 50 f1.8, Canon 55-250
Always looking to improve!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RickyH
Senior Member
398 posts
Joined Feb 2009
     
Sep 10, 2009 00:01 |  #2

As soon as I read you're intro, I knew this should be interesting.


Website: www.rickyhavlik.com (external link)
Equipment: Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 40D, Canon 70-200 2.8, Canon 24-70 2.8, Canon 430 Speedlite.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c0r3y.aF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
64 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Rhode Island, US
     
Sep 10, 2009 08:42 |  #3

Haha, I was hoping it would grab someone's attention. Now I just need to see how the strength of that old prime compares to today's zooms.


Canon t3i, Sigma 17-50 f2.8, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, Canon 50 f1.8, Canon 55-250
Always looking to improve!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Sep 10, 2009 08:49 |  #4

Is next test with a 55-250? :p


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c0r3y.aF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
64 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Rhode Island, US
     
Sep 10, 2009 18:57 as a reply to  @ pwm2's post |  #5

Haha, not with mine! I'll have to find something to use


Canon t3i, Sigma 17-50 f2.8, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, Canon 50 f1.8, Canon 55-250
Always looking to improve!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
verymagicalguy
Member
49 posts
Joined Mar 2008
     
Sep 11, 2009 04:56 |  #6

Pretty cool. I've seen that the 50 f/1.8 are pretty durable as well.


http://kevinwuphotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BenJohnson
Goldmember
Avatar
1,811 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Sep 11, 2009 12:16 |  #7

pwm2 wrote in post #8617828 (external link)
Is next test with a 55-250? :p

Here's my 55-250 after taking a direct hit!

IMAGE: http://benjohnson.smugmug.com/photos/470770138_BaaDt-M.jpg

|Ben Johnson Photography (external link)|
|Gear List|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J.Napier
Senior Member
Avatar
886 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Washington State
     
Sep 12, 2009 15:38 |  #8

Im going out right now and going to test my 200 1.8. Be right back...


Jeff
Gear List
www.jni-ss.com / (external link)Blog (external link)
Sportshooterpage (external link) / Maxpreps (external link)
Facebook  (external link)/

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Anke
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009
Avatar
30,454 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Royal Tunbridge Wells, UK
     
Sep 12, 2009 15:48 |  #9

Interesting test :D


Anke
1D Mark IV | 16-35L f/2.8 II | 24-70L f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 50 f/1.4 | 600EX-RT and ST-E3-RT
Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter (external link) | Tunbridge Wells (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Sep 12, 2009 16:04 |  #10

For people feeling an urge to test their lenses: Make sure the front element is convex. A flat front element - or a filter - will have a much harder time handling the impact.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c0r3y.aF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
64 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Rhode Island, US
     
Sep 12, 2009 20:57 |  #11

pwm2 wrote in post #8632432 (external link)
For people feeling an urge to test their lenses: Make sure the front element is convex. A flat front element - or a filter - will have a much harder time handling the impact.

How/where can you go to tell if your lens is convex, or how thick the glass is? I have no idea what my 55-250 is like on the inside.


Canon t3i, Sigma 17-50 f2.8, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, Canon 50 f1.8, Canon 55-250
Always looking to improve!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c0r3y.aF
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
64 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Rhode Island, US
     
Sep 12, 2009 20:57 |  #12

BenJohnson wrote in post #8625557 (external link)
Here's my 55-250 after taking a direct hit!

QUOTED IMAGE

Survived? Sweet. How far was the person that shot you/what was the velocity?


Canon t3i, Sigma 17-50 f2.8, Rokinon 8mm fisheye, Canon 50 f1.8, Canon 55-250
Always looking to improve!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,318 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Testing Glass Strength
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1248 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.