Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 09 Sep 2009 (Wednesday) 21:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First attempt at OCF

 
Nates98cbr
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
     
Sep 09, 2009 21:08 |  #1

These were shot tonight around 8:00pm, had the iso at 1600 so they look noisy. Any suggestions and help would be greatly appreciated. Softbox camera left on 1/8 and 1/16th, 580EXII.

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3530/3904973289_760f01d8a7.jpg

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3532/3904972779_2b4770f378.jpg

My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phamster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,315 posts
Likes: 51
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Purdue - Go Boilers
     
Sep 09, 2009 21:13 |  #2

nate..

what was your shutter speeds? and did you really need 1600?

i don't think so.

ok.. @ 8pm.. you can have your iso around 800.. shutter around 1/80 or even 1/50.. or 1/60ish..

but that all depends on your F stop.. start off with 5.6 then move up or down or move your light in or out..

1/16 power is probably a little low.. 1/8 is where i would have started off..


"Lighting will make or break your photo"
Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Interview with Mike Panic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redfire_Cobra
Senior Member
Avatar
872 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
     
Sep 09, 2009 21:16 |  #3

To me these look like they were exposed for natural light and the flash is not really doing much except adding a catch light to their eyes. Underexpose your background by about a stop and let the flash light your subjects, that will give you more "pop".


Canon 60D
Canon 50 f/1.8, Canon 70-200L f/2.8,
-Chris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nates98cbr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
     
Sep 09, 2009 21:20 |  #4

phamster wrote in post #8615488 (external link)
nate..

what was your shutter speeds? and did you really need 1600?

i don't think so.

ok.. @ 8pm.. you can have your iso around 800.. shutter around 1/80 or even 1/50.. or 1/60ish..

but that all depends on your F stop.. start off with 5.6 then move up or down or move your light in or out..

1/16 power is probably a little low.. 1/8 is where i would have started off..

I will try again tomorrow. I tried a lower iso but I couldn't get the shutter speed up even at 4, which is lowest my 70-200 goes. The few I took on the 1/8th power seemed really washed out, the softbox was prob 6-8 ft from them.

I will try again tomorrow though!!


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nates98cbr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
     
Sep 09, 2009 21:25 |  #5

Redfire_Cobra wrote in post #8615509 (external link)
To me these look like they were exposed for natural light and the flash is not really doing much except adding a catch light to their eyes. Underexpose your background by about a stop and let the flash light your subjects, that will give you more "pop".

Thanks for the suggestion, I will try again tomorrow hopefully.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phamster
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,315 posts
Likes: 51
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Purdue - Go Boilers
     
Sep 09, 2009 21:42 |  #6

so what was your settings for this photos posted?

i need to see your

shutter speeds
fstops
what camera body too
and what mode your shot in the posted photos..

size of softbox?


"Lighting will make or break your photo"
Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)
Interview with Mike Panic (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Redfire_Cobra
Senior Member
Avatar
872 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Georgia
     
Sep 09, 2009 22:09 |  #7

Nates98cbr wrote in post #8615551 (external link)
Thanks for the suggestion, I will try again tomorrow hopefully.

Definitely give it another go, you will get the hang of it in no time! These are not bad at all but with a little less ambient and more flash it will really improve them. I would also shoot at f4 and increase the distance from the tree to give some separation from the background.


Canon 60D
Canon 50 f/1.8, Canon 70-200L f/2.8,
-Chris

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed.
Goldmember
Avatar
2,978 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: 2114.syd.nsw.au
     
Sep 09, 2009 22:21 |  #8

Nates98cbr wrote in post #8615528 (external link)
I will try again tomorrow. I tried a lower iso but I couldn't get the shutter speed up even at 4, which is lowest my 70-200 goes. The few I took on the 1/8th power seemed really washed out, the softbox was prob 6-8 ft from them.

I will try again tomorrow though!!

What mode are you shooting in?!


http://www.edwardhor.c​om (external link)
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/edwardhor/ (external link)
http://www.modelmayhem​.com/EdwardHor (external link)
http://www.twitter.com​/edwardhor (external link)
justAL: PIxel peeping is what separates the men from the boys!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 10, 2009 09:30 |  #9

Try a different background too. The tree would be okay if it were the whole background but doesnt work as is. One of the nice things about ocf is using the difference between exposing the background area and the subject. The tree is so close its getting the same exposure as the subject meaning not a lot of dynamic range in the photo. Its amazing how even a rather mundane background can really set off photo when its slightly defocused and darker with an illuminated subject.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nates98cbr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
     
Sep 10, 2009 10:46 |  #10

phamster wrote in post #8615624 (external link)
so what was your settings for this photos posted?

i need to see your

shutter speeds
fstops
what camera body too
and what mode your shot in the posted photos..

size of softbox?

Canon 30D, manual mode (usually shoot in Av for people),
first photo was 1/125, second was 1/80, both at f 4.0 and 70mm, softbox is 60cm x 40cm, prob 6-8ft away. The photos were adjusted in Lightroom too.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nates98cbr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
     
Sep 10, 2009 10:48 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #8618030 (external link)
Try a different background too. The tree would be okay if it were the whole background but doesnt work as is. One of the nice things about ocf is using the difference between exposing the background area and the subject. The tree is so close its getting the same exposure as the subject meaning not a lot of dynamic range in the photo. Its amazing how even a rather mundane background can really set off photo when its slightly defocused and darker with an illuminated subject.

Yea I agree, I should have had them further away or just standing in the open to get more depth in the photo.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scoen
Senior Member
Avatar
359 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Springfield, OR
     
Sep 10, 2009 12:56 |  #12

You did a very good job exposing the ambient light here. ISO 1600 was extremely unnecessary. I never shoot over ISO 250 when I am using strobes. Don't be hesitant to underexpose your backgrounds. It's nearly impossible to get perfect exposure throughout an entire photo. I know what the rules say, but your only supposed to learn the rules so you know how to break them. Next time try ISO 200 f/8 @ 80 with your speedlight at 1/4 to half power. Try it out and go from there, a slightly underexposed background with a properly exposed subject will be much more exciting to look at. Great shots and keep shooting :)

I forgot to say, For a first Attempt you've got me beat by a long shot, my first OCF stuff was horrendous... lol


CoenPhotography (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nates98cbr
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
     
Sep 10, 2009 15:03 |  #13

Scoen wrote in post #8619262 (external link)
You did a very good job exposing the ambient light here. ISO 1600 was extremely unnecessary. I never shoot over ISO 250 when I am using strobes. Don't be hesitant to underexpose your backgrounds. It's nearly impossible to get perfect exposure throughout an entire photo. I know what the rules say, but your only supposed to learn the rules so you know how to break them. Next time try ISO 200 f/8 @ 80 with your speedlight at 1/4 to half power. Try it out and go from there, a slightly underexposed background with a properly exposed subject will be much more exciting to look at. Great shots and keep shooting :)

I forgot to say, For a first Attempt you've got me beat by a long shot, my first OCF stuff was horrendous... lol

Thank you very much!!


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,863 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
First attempt at OCF
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is bzguy
1645 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.