you overcharged.
crricha13 Mostly Lurking 14 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Sep 12, 2009 08:23 | #16 you overcharged.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikekelley "Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!" 7,317 posts Likes: 16 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Sep 12, 2009 08:43 | #17 crricha13 wrote in post #8630422 you overcharged. Thanks for the deep insight. Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Zansho "I'd kill for a hot pink 40D" More info | Sep 12, 2009 10:21 | #18 To be perfectly blunt, I think your work does not reflect what a professional portrait photographer would have done. In a few of the photos, the hand placements look a tad awkward (one guy has his hands in his lap, kind of drawing attention to his pelvic area). Your lighting looks fairly decent, but like the others have said, a hair light would have gone a long way in helping your images pop a little bit more, and maybe even a background light. http://www.michaeljsamaripa.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | A couple of points: TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | A tactical point with respect to photographing groups: TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PMCphotography Goldmember 1,775 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Tasmania, Australia. More info | Sep 13, 2009 18:44 | #21 RDKirk wrote in post #8630958 If the client is not satisfied, I will offer to reshoot. If reshooting is not feasible, I will refund. I don't hold anyone's money if they're not happy with the product. 2. "...Everything is either full freight or free." Agreed. I've only had to offer a reshoot once, due to the fact that the client didn't tell me a specific grouping she wanted. We did the reshoot, and she was fine with it. Twitter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mutau052 Senior Member 535 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Edmond, OK More info | Sep 13, 2009 21:04 | #22 jra wrote in post #8627902 After reading through the thread and looking at the photos in question, If it were me, I would refund the money. IMO, for $200, I would consider the photos sub-par at best. If I paid $200 for those photos, I would be upset also. agreed, these were snapshots at best. 6D w/ BG-13, 40D w/ BG-E2N, Canon 50mm f/1.8ii, Canon 24-70 f/2.8L USM, Canon 430 EXii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NicoleFaith Senior Member 693 posts Joined Jun 2007 Location: Michigan More info | Sep 14, 2009 09:58 | #23 I am on the fence about this. I don't think the images are horrible, some have a more red balance to them, cropping issues and some seem on the soft side - but they are just family portraits - posed and smiled. I do think for $200.00 and you still being in the "learning" stages, you should offer some prints with that package though - not just $200.00 for your time. visit my website -> http://www.nicolepfeifferphotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ddb Member 179 posts Joined Aug 2008 More info | Sep 14, 2009 13:23 | #24 For future reference, try to get the family together on what to wear. Also,the women would have looked much better with sleeves! Sleeveless dresses and shirts are terrible for portraits. It may not have saved your session, but they would have looked much better. 5DMk1, 60D, 17-40L, 24-105L, 100-400L, Tamron 90mm macro, nifty-fifty, 70-210, Panasonic G1, 14-45, 45-200 www.endshot.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SwiftFootTim Goldmember 1,054 posts Likes: 3 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Michigan More info | Sep 14, 2009 13:52 | #25 The venue change is a horrible experience, but I also advocate not going out on a job without being prepared for at least some minor inconveniences. I would consider this one a major inconvenience but at the same time, I would expect a professional photog to have at least a few lights to use no matter what the occasion. Canon 1D MkIII, 580 EX II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 300 f/2.8 EX DG HSM, Lowepro Flipside 400 AW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JulieNick Member 233 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: North East Point, NS More info | Sep 14, 2009 14:04 | #26 not to be an ass but if you are still learning and practicing why are you charging for your time? Yes, charge for the prints but not for your time. http://www.flickr.com/photos/27834677@N06/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeeJay Goldmember 3,834 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2005 Location: Warwickshire - UK More info | Sep 16, 2009 05:57 | #27 Sorry this has gone bad for you. 1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1580 guests, 170 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||