Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 10 Sep 2009 (Thursday) 10:06
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Client (family friend) unhappy question...

 
crricha13
Mostly Lurking
14 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Sep 12, 2009 08:23 |  #16

you overcharged.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mikekelley
"Meow! Bark! Honk! Hiss! Grrr! Tweet!"
Avatar
7,317 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Sep 12, 2009 08:43 |  #17

crricha13 wrote in post #8630422 (external link)
you overcharged.

Thanks for the deep insight.


Los Angeles-Based Architectural, Interior, And Luxury Real Estate Photography (external link)
How To Photograph Real Estate and Architecture (external link)
My Fine Art Galleries (external link)
My articles at Fstoppers.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zansho
"I'd kill for a hot pink 40D"
Avatar
2,547 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 800
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Austin, Tx
     
Sep 12, 2009 10:21 |  #18

To be perfectly blunt, I think your work does not reflect what a professional portrait photographer would have done. In a few of the photos, the hand placements look a tad awkward (one guy has his hands in his lap, kind of drawing attention to his pelvic area). Your lighting looks fairly decent, but like the others have said, a hair light would have gone a long way in helping your images pop a little bit more, and maybe even a background light.

I know this doesn't help you now, but the client in question is obviously dissatisfied with your work, and in all likelihood, probably doesn't even want you to do a re-shoot and it's pretty much impossible anyway, since the family flew in from other locations. I'd refund the money - your reputation is far more valuable than the $200.00 you charged for this particular client. They haven't ordered anything, so just take the images down, and refund the money, and chalk this up to growing pains - and most importantly, practice and learn how to better take photos of this kind, and learn your current equipment better. If you had kept all those speedlights, you could have done so many things differently.


http://www.michaeljsam​aripa.com (external link) creating beautiful images for myself, my clients, and the world. Shooting with a mix of Canon, Fuji, and Sony.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,370 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1375
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 12, 2009 10:25 as a reply to  @ mikekelley's post |  #19

A couple of points:

1. If I'm not fully satisfied that the quality of my work is at better than minimum professional standards (better than Wal-Mart or Sears), I will offer to reshoot. If the client is not satisfied, I will offer to reshoot. If reshooting is not feasible, I will refund. I don't hold anyone's money if they're not happy with the product.

2. I never reduce prices, I never charge "expenses only," I never charge a cut rate. Everything is either full freight or free.

Yes, I may work for a close friend or relative completely free of charge as a gift...if I like that person well enough to give them an expensive gift (otherwise, I just send them a Hallmark and call it done). I also do free charity work.

However, people do not appreciate reduced prices in photography. They don't understand that they're getting a "good deal" by your good graces. If you charge them a dime, they expect top-notch service and your own relatives will turn into clientzillas.

But you control the amount of work you do when it's a free gift. So either I like them well enough to give them a gift, or I charge them the full price. I don't mind bending over backwards for full price--see #1 above.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,370 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1375
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Sep 12, 2009 10:29 as a reply to  @ RDKirk's post |  #20

A tactical point with respect to photographing groups:

With digital, we have the ability to make easy composites if we plan for it ahead of time.

I always shoot groups on a tripod so that I get accurate shot-to-shot registration. As I take multiple shots, I will concentrate specifically on troublesome persons in turn to get at least a couple of good shots of each of them.

Then I'll swap heads, hands, whatever, as necessary to get a final product in which everyone looks good.

Yes, that means there might only be one or two final images that I show...this is something I explain to the client.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PMCphotography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,775 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Tasmania, Australia.
     
Sep 13, 2009 18:44 |  #21

RDKirk wrote in post #8630958 (external link)
If the client is not satisfied, I will offer to reshoot. If reshooting is not feasible, I will refund. I don't hold anyone's money if they're not happy with the product.

2. "...Everything is either full freight or free."

Agreed. I've only had to offer a reshoot once, due to the fact that the client didn't tell me a specific grouping she wanted. We did the reshoot, and she was fine with it.

But I absolutely agree with refunding their money and taking the pictures down. It's s very small world, and if word goes around that you're unprofessional(at best) and a terrible photographer (at worst) that will set your business/brand back quite a bit. Don't discount, it makes you look like you don't have faith in your product.


Twitter (external link)
Hobart Wedding Photography (external link)
I have some camera stuff. Here it is.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mutau052
Senior Member
Avatar
535 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Edmond, OK
     
Sep 13, 2009 21:04 |  #22

jra wrote in post #8627902 (external link)
After reading through the thread and looking at the photos in question, If it were me, I would refund the money. IMO, for $200, I would consider the photos sub-par at best.
If I paid $200 for those photos, I would be upset also.

agreed, these were snapshots at best.


6D w/ BG-13, 40D w/ BG-E2N, Canon 50mm f/1.8ii, Canon 24-70 f/2.8L USM, Canon 430 EXii

www.thebwlife.com (external link)

http://thebwlife.wordp​ress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nicole ­ Faith
Senior Member
693 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 14, 2009 09:58 |  #23

I am on the fence about this. I don't think the images are horrible, some have a more red balance to them, cropping issues and some seem on the soft side - but they are just family portraits - posed and smiled. I do think for $200.00 and you still being in the "learning" stages, you should offer some prints with that package though - not just $200.00 for your time.

I never think you should refund unless the issue was completely your fault - lost images, damage, something like that. You still went and did the shoot. I think offering something is the next best option. I also think that since the client changed the location at the last minuet - you should bring that up and explain that you were prepared for an outdoor shoot and they requested an indoor shoot at the last minuet. Non-photographers will not understand what this means by any means due to not understanding lighting - which is the key element to photography. I think that needs to be explained to them. If there were people coming from FL and there was a chance of rain or something to ruin the outdoor shoot, then a backup inside location should have been planned and lighting brought for that.

I make it part of my client meeting to explain such things to them before hand, so they also know what to expect. I also explain that if they want physical elements of themselves changed - chin, bags under eyes, wrinkles - that they also need to let me know prior to editing and there may be an additional cost. I am there to make them look their best, not make them look like someone else. If they want me to, they just have to pay me.

I ramble, but those are my thoughts.


visit my website -> http://www.nicolepfeif​ferphotography.com (external link)
visit my blog -> http://www.blog.nicole​pfeifferphotography.co​m (external link)
add me on facebook -> http://www.facebook.co​m/nicolepfeifferphotog​raphy (external link)
http://nicolepfeifferp​hotography.blogspot.co​m/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ddb
Member
179 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Sep 14, 2009 13:23 |  #24

For future reference, try to get the family together on what to wear. Also,the women would have looked much better with sleeves! Sleeveless dresses and shirts are terrible for portraits. It may not have saved your session, but they would have looked much better.


5DMk1, 60D, 17-40L, 24-105L, 100-400L, Tamron 90mm macro, nifty-fifty, 70-210, Panasonic G1, 14-45, 45-200 www.endshot.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SwiftFootTim
Goldmember
Avatar
1,054 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
     
Sep 14, 2009 13:52 |  #25

The venue change is a horrible experience, but I also advocate not going out on a job without being prepared for at least some minor inconveniences. I would consider this one a major inconvenience but at the same time, I would expect a professional photog to have at least a few lights to use no matter what the occasion.

In this circumstance, you're probably best to refund the $200, take down the images and say that's that.


Canon 1D MkIII, 580 EX II, 70-200mm f/2.8L IS, Sigma 300 f/2.8 EX DG HSM, Lowepro Flipside 400 AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JulieNick
Member
Avatar
233 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: North East Point, NS
     
Sep 14, 2009 14:04 |  #26

not to be an ass but if you are still learning and practicing why are you charging for your time? Yes, charge for the prints but not for your time.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/27834677@N06/ (external link)
Gear: Canon XTi, Sigma 17-70, Canon 5d classic, Promaster 7500 speed light.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeeJay
Goldmember
Avatar
3,834 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Warwickshire - UK
     
Sep 16, 2009 05:57 |  #27

Sorry this has gone bad for you.

A few tech issues. Why, when you have a full-frame camera, are you cropping so tightly "in camera" when taking the shot. Many of them (as you now know!) have had various joints cropped, giving you no recovery area at all.

Try and allow a significant "free" area around the subjects so that you can crop the photos to a suitable point AFTER you have taken them. It also allows you to crop to a variety of print formats. A full-frame image doesn't crop well to a 10x8 photo, you'll end up cutting even more off! (you loose 17% of the height of a full-frame pic when cropped to a 10x8 ratio)

I'm not a big fan of black backgrounds. Yes, I guess it makes lighting a tad easier (or does it?) but it also means that a lot of subject matter just blends into the backdrop (unless you have more lights for rim lighting - I see a viscious circle!) In particular the lady holding the baby (a lovely shot BTW) seems to be missing the lower half of her body. Maybe a discussion about clothing beforehand may have helped.

Be aware that bare skin (mainly arms) attracts the viewers attention, so the less bare skin the better.

I do not agree with others who suggest you should display ALL the photos from the shoot. IMHO you should only ever show the final (adjusted) selection.

I would refund the shoot money and take the photos down. You will probably find that they then come back wanting prints! - in which case - charge them whatever your full price is for the prints they want.

Good luck for the future, I think you re doing most things right - life's one big learning curve.

TJ


1DsMkIII | 1DMkIIN | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 24-70 f/2.8L | 24-105 f/4L IS | 17-40 f/4L | 50 f/1.2L | WFT-E1 & E2 Transmitters - Click Here for setup advice | CP-E4 Battery Pack x 2 | ST-E2 | 580EX | 550EX | 430EXII | 420EX | Tripod + monopod | Bowens Esprit Gemini 500W/s heads & Travel-Pak | All this gear - and still no idea :confused:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,904 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Client (family friend) unhappy question...
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1580 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.