Thorrulz wrote in post #8635412
Lately my print photo's have been coming back looking quite a bit darker than what is displayed on my monitor. From what I understand, calibrating your monitor is the first step in correcting the problem. I don't want too spend more than I need to, but I don't want to go cheap and wish I had spent the few extra bucks either. My question is what do some of you photographer's use to calibrate your monitors. Thanks in advance everyone.
I use Spyder. However, if your prints are dark, the most likely cause is a monitor that's 'way too bright. Most low-to-moderate colorimeters won't correct for that, and unfortunately there are a lot of monitors of a technology that can't be satisfactorily dimmed.
What you need is a monitor that can be dimmed to around the brightness of a sheet of print paper--about 90 candelas per square meter.
I'm not a monitor technology maven, but the lower end monitors touted as "ideal for gaming" are usually very bright (250-300 candelas per square meter) and are of a technology that can't be dimmed without grossly distorting the color balance. It's a TN technology that's both very bright and cheap. In my recent shopping, most "gamers" monitors in the low-to-moderate price range fell into that category.
The top end "professional" or "expert" monitors ($1000 USD and up) are of satisfactory technology that can be directly dimmed as low as necessary, and you can find some "business" and "enterprise" monitors that you can jockey using their brightness and contrast controls.
Generally speaking, if it's bright and quick enough for gamers and cheap (under $500), it may not be a technology that allows acceptable dimming.