Im looking to buy a calibrator for my Mac Pro and Macbook Pro and I was wondering which is best for sub £100?
If its hugely worth it then more up and over £100 is ok.
Recommendations? (Don't mind second hand!)
Cheers
Chambord Senior Member 310 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Sep 13, 2009 08:30 | #1 Im looking to buy a calibrator for my Mac Pro and Macbook Pro and I was wondering which is best for sub £100?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Sep 13, 2009 09:11 | #2 Concorde Rules wrote in post #8635537 Recommendations? (Don't mind second hand!) Search for a lightly used EyeOne Display 2, Spyder3 Elite, or Monaco Optix XR Pro. I bought my Spyder3 Elite used and saved about 40%. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2009 13:00 | #3 Found a EyeOne Display 2 for £75, £140 new...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Sep 13, 2009 14:09 | #4 I wonder whether the Monaco Optix XR Pro software will work under a newer OSX? "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Sep 13, 2009 15:06 | #5 Concorde Rules wrote in post #8636584 Found a EyeOne Display 2 for £75, £140 new... Grab it! Concorde Rules wrote in post #8636584 Spyder3 Pro is £89 new, why is the elite so much better? Because the Elite version competes feature for feature with the EyeOne Display 2. The so-called "Pro" version software lacks certain desirable features, like being able to specify a custom target luminance value. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 18, 2009 19:44 | #6 Ok got a Eye-One Display 2 for £90 in the end
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Sep 19, 2009 10:11 | #7 Concorde Rules wrote in post #8668486 6500K looks incredibly blue (but according to the checker the best dE value of a tad over 1 but the native of about 6k is more out, about dE of 1.2 but looks much more natural. As a photographer who wants to print and post on the net going for native or 6500k or what? On a laptop, whether Mac or PC, I'd stay with the Native setting and not worry so much about the dE. The proof will be in whether your prints match the display. Make sure you do the calibration in a dim room with no light projected onto the screen. Allow the screen to warm up for at least 30 minutes. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RDKirk Adorama says I'm "packed." More info | Sep 19, 2009 10:40 | #8 Concorde Rules wrote in post #8668486 Ok got a Eye-One Display 2 for £90 in the end ![]() However now im confused by the color temperature I want to head for? 6500K looks incredibly blue (but according to the checker the best dE value of a tad over 1 but the native of about 6k is more out, about dE of 1.2 but looks much more natural. As a photographer who wants to print and post on the net going for native or 6500k or what? Cheers! If you're using a good printing lab, they can tell you what setting to use for their printing processes. TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2009 10:47 | #9 ChasP505 wrote in post #8671051 On a laptop, whether Mac or PC, I'd stay with the Native setting and not worry so much about the dE. The proof will be in whether your prints match the display. Make sure you do the calibration in a dim room with no light projected onto the screen. Allow the screen to warm up for at least 30 minutes. LED Based Macbook Pro was my test subject in a dark room.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Sep 19, 2009 12:17 | #10 Concorde Rules wrote in post #8671171 ...Got the Luminance to 122.2 and black to 0.19... Important to not force the Brightness all the way to 0 to achieve a target luminance. If the display is at say 140cd/m2 at 5-10% Brightness, I'd live with it. And don't force the Black point either. Just let it fall where it falls relative to the white luminance, as long as the ratio of white to black is at least 400:1. Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 19, 2009 19:19 | #11 ChasP505 wrote in post #8671576 Important to not force the Brightness all the way to 0 to achieve a target luminance. If the display is at say 140cd/m2 at 5-10% Brightness, I'd live with it. And don't force the Black point either. Just let it fall where it falls relative to the white luminance, as long as the ratio of white to black is at least 400:1. 120 / 400 = .30. Ohhhh ok.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChasP505 "brain damaged old guy" 5,566 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 Location: New Mexico, USA More info | Sep 19, 2009 20:44 | #12 Concorde Rules wrote in post #8673073 Am I wrong in thinking that paper white should equal screen white? The important thing is how your prints match the screen when viewed under appropriate lighting. Concorde Rules wrote in post #8673073 White has a tint to it at 6500K... maybe its the screen *shrug* Maybe you should try Native... Chas P
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 655 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||