Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Sep 2009 (Monday) 22:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Feather detail with a beta 7D

 
liquidstone
insane Bird photographer
Avatar
1,089 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 14, 2009 22:47 |  #1

Here's sharing a bird photo from a pre-production 7D I tried recently. :)

Yellow-vented Bulbul (Pycnonotus goiavier)
Canon 7D (pre-prod.) + 400 2.8 L IS, f/2.8, ISO 200, 1/200 sec, manual exposure in available light, tripod/gimbal head, cropped to 2400x1600, then processed and resized to 1200x800:

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/117294626/original.jpg



And this is how severe the photo was cropped - unprocessed/uncropped full frame, 2 sharpness in DPP, 2.81 MB jpeg:

http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/117​294859/original (external link)

Regards,

Romy

Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds (external link)
Over 260 species captured in habitat, and counting.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crenda
Member
Avatar
117 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Southern CT
     
Sep 14, 2009 22:57 |  #2

Very nice shot.


-Chris Renda
Chris Renda Photography (external link)
http://www.chrisrenda.​com/ (external link)http://www.chrisrenda.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tharmsen
Goldmember
Avatar
1,737 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: NW Indiana
     
Sep 14, 2009 23:05 |  #3

Awesome shot, great looking image.




Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
griptape
Goldmember
2,037 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Home
     
Sep 14, 2009 23:37 |  #4

liquidstone wrote in post #8645801 (external link)
400 2.8 L IS, f/2.8, ISO 200, 1/200 sec, manual exposure in available light, tripod/gimbal head, cropped to 2400x1600, then processed and resized to 1200x800:

I'm extremely unimpressed by this image given the lens and cropping. I'd be surprised if and XSi couldn't keep up given the same equipment.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 14, 2009 23:40 |  #5

Subscribing

(...and grabbing some popcorn)


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liquidstone
THREAD ­ STARTER
insane Bird photographer
Avatar
1,089 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 14, 2009 23:47 |  #6

griptape wrote in post #8646042 (external link)
I'm extremely unimpressed by this image given the lens and cropping. I'd be surprised if and XSi couldn't keep up given the same equipment.

I respect your opinion. ;)


Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds (external link)
Over 260 species captured in habitat, and counting.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jgrussell
Looking around nervously
Avatar
18,758 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: NJ USA
     
Sep 14, 2009 23:52 |  #7

At f2.8???? Okay, that's it. I want mine NOW.


-- jgr
blog (external link) | gear | my birds (external link)http://photos.jgrussel​l.com/gallery/7381653_​pK9fK (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
XterraJohn
Senior Member
513 posts
Joined Aug 2008
     
Sep 15, 2009 00:09 |  #8

griptape wrote in post #8646042 (external link)
I'm extremely unimpressed by this image given the lens and cropping. I'd be surprised if and XSi couldn't keep up given the same equipment.

From what I understand, the XSi is an excellent camera. I liked my XTi.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jorkata
Member
213 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Sep 15, 2009 00:24 |  #9

liquidstone wrote in post #8645801 (external link)
Here's sharing a bird photo from a pre-production 7D I tried recently. :)

Hi Romy, thanks for sharing.
I think the level of detail is impressive in both this and the bee-eater shots. They look great!

However, what is your honest opinion of the 7D's abilities at ISO 400-800.

On your shots at these ISOs I'm seeing the same 'white noise' that is present on all of RG's sample images (external link) - the omnipresent little white specs that appear be a noise-reduction artifact.


They seem to be gone in your processed images.
How do they affect post-processing.
Are they something to be worried about?

Also, what is your overall impression with camera.

Thanks
George




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liquidstone
THREAD ­ STARTER
insane Bird photographer
Avatar
1,089 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 15, 2009 00:49 |  #10

Hi George,

I'm pasting here (in italics) my comments posted in another forum:

Based on capturing and processing in DPP many RAWs with a beta 7D, here are my impressions on the camera's noise characteristics. Note that this is a result of my subjective "visual feel," and not based on objective scientific testing or numbers.

1. ISO 100 is very clean and can take aggressive sharpening before noise starts to be noticeable in the shadows.

2. ISO 200 - 400 are not as clean when compared pixel-to-pixel as those of the 5D2, 40D, 1D2 and 20D. Noise (albeit very fine grained) starts to be noticeable in the shadows with aggressive sharpening.

3. ISO 3200 - 6400 have fine grained noise, but none of the banding I see in the 5D2. Even ISO 12800 has no or very little banding, but the noise grains seem to be larger, and as such this ISO is perhaps only useable for smaller prints or for greatly resized web photos.

4. I'm under the impression that the 7D's noise charateristics are optimized for print rather than pixel-peeping at 100%. I welcome this approach, as we can easily filter out the noise when posting web-sized photos. I haven't printed 7D photos yet, but when I compare these to my previous photos which were printed large, the 7D's fine-grained noise should do well in printing.

Setting aside AF performance (which I wasn't able to test extensively because of severe rains in our islands), and noting my comments above on the noise characterisitics, the 7D is a solid performer in all other areas as specced.



jorkata wrote in post #8646226 (external link)
Hi Romy, thanks for sharing.
I think the level of detail is impressive in both this and the bee-eater shots. They look great!

However, what is your honest opinion of the 7D's abilities at ISO 400-800.

On your shots at these ISOs I'm seeing the same 'white noise' that is present on all of RG's sample images (external link) - the omnipresent little white specs that appear be a noise-reduction artifact.

They seem to be gone in your processed images.
How do they affect post-processing.
Are they something to be worried about?

Also, what is your overall impression with camera.

Thanks
George


Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds (external link)
Over 260 species captured in habitat, and counting.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jorkata
Member
213 posts
Joined Sep 2009
     
Sep 15, 2009 01:11 as a reply to  @ liquidstone's post |  #11

Thanks. Very informative.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,422 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:04 |  #12

You are threatening to cause serious damage to my bank balance :lol:


Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rikaro
Member
153 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Vancouver
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:09 |  #13

wow color and contrast look awesome! The minor noise doesn't bother me at all.


Matt Kwok
http://www.matt-kwok.com/blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MaDProFF
Goldmember
Avatar
4,369 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2007
Location: East Sussex, UK
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:12 |  #14

Lets face it, the 7D is going to be an all round great camera, and certainly very tempting for many being a 1.6 crop at 18 MP it just gives you so many more options to play with images over any other body they made so far.
They have no choice now with the Nikon bodies available to make sure they introduce a spot on body for a much cheaper cost, and that they are


Photographic Images on Brett Butler (external link) px500 (external link) & Flickr (external link) Some Canon Bodies , few blackish lenses, A dam heavy black one, couple dirty white ones, a 3 legged walking stick, a mono walking stick, and a bag full of rubbish :oops:
And Still Learning all walks of life, & most of all Photography.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zincozinco
-Followers of Fidget-
Avatar
4,420 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: AndalucĂ­a
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:22 |  #15

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #8646051 (external link)
Subscribing

(...and grabbing some popcorn)

share :) pls pls


Living the life, overexposing...
Web (external link), Blog (external link) Name: Mike, Maik, Micke or just zinco.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

28,810 views & 0 likes for this thread, 62 members have posted to it.
Feather detail with a beta 7D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1050 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.