Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Sep 2009 (Monday) 22:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Feather detail with a beta 7D

 
muusers
Goldmember
Avatar
1,024 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Haarlem, Netherlands
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:28 |  #16

rikaro wrote in post #8646811 (external link)
wow color and contrast look awesome! The minor noise doesn't bother me at all.

every EOS cam would make awesome shots with a 400mm f2.8L... Color and contrast mainly depend on the lens, not the body.

I´m fairly unimpressed, the noise in the butter-soft bokeh really anoys me.


50D + 17-55 | s100 | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toxic
Goldmember
3,498 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2008
Location: California
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:29 |  #17

Based on this, I want to say Canon has finally surpassed the 5D's resolution in an APS-C camera (the 50D wasn't quite there). We'll have to see how it holds up with noise, but it looks like a winner so far.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:37 |  #18

I'm not impressed by this either. It is mediocre in terms of detail and sharpness. Don't know if that is a result of the lens, camera or processing. Maybe more sharpening would help.

If you're trying to show the quality of the 7D I think you've failed. As a stellar birding picture it is not one. I'm not saying the 7D is not capable because I think it might be. Stephen Eastwood's shots on another thread are impressive; I just don't think this image is a positive example.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scoobs
Senior Member
Avatar
636 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Swf, Essex, Uk
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:49 |  #19

I think it's a good shot. I'm really looking forward to see how the 7D's AF performs, especially with birds, as this would be my biggest reason to upgrade from my 20D, which is good but does let me down some times with its AF.

The so called issue people have with noise is not important for me as prints made from my 20D at iso 800 & 1600 come out very nicely even at A4 sizes and what i've seen from the 7D samples are certainly no worse.


:D Stu :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogster86
Goldmember
Avatar
1,968 posts
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Godalming, Surrey, UK
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:51 |  #20

gooble wrote in post #8646877 (external link)
I'm not impressed by this either. It is mediocre in terms of detail and sharpness. Don't know if that is a result of the lens, camera or processing. Maybe more sharpening would help.

If you're trying to show the quality of the 7D I think you've failed. As a stellar birding picture it is not one. I'm not saying the 7D is not capable because I think it might be. Stephen Eastwood's shots on another thread are impressive; I just don't think this image is a positive example.

I can't see an issue myself, considering the image in the first post was cropped from this!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'


What more can you expect?

David :confused:

PS. Great job Romy! :)

David Hogg LRPS (external link) | My Gear! | Horizon Imaging (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KCY
Unlocked the hidden 117 point AF
Avatar
7,170 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jun 2009
Location: I wish I knew...
     
Sep 15, 2009 04:53 |  #21

*drooooool* can't wait....


KC - The Circle of PoTN - Member of the UCPC
My Gear|My Smugmug (external link)|Pong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pknight
Goldmember
Avatar
2,693 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 128
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Flyover Country
     
Sep 15, 2009 05:21 |  #22

This was with a pre-production model. It's not worth worrying about minor noise from a camera noone will ever own. Around November there will be plenty of real samples and the picture will be clearer (so to speak).


Digital EOS 90D Canon: EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro, Life-Size Converter EF Tamron: SP 17-50mm f/2.8 DiII, 18-400mm f/3.5-6.3 DiII VC HLD, SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2, SP 70-200 f/2.8 Di VC USD, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5 DiII VC HLD Sigma: 30mm f/1.4 DC Art Rokinon: 8mm f/3.5 AS IF UMC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liquidstone
THREAD ­ STARTER
insane Bird photographer
Avatar
1,089 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 15, 2009 05:43 |  #23

gooble wrote in post #8646877 (external link)
I'm not impressed by this either. It is mediocre in terms of detail and sharpness. Don't know if that is a result of the lens, camera or processing. Maybe more sharpening would help.

If you're trying to show the quality of the 7D I think you've failed. As a stellar birding picture it is not one. I'm not saying the 7D is not capable because I think it might be. Stephen Eastwood's shots on another thread are impressive; I just don't think this image is a positive example.

Thanks for your comments. Care to share a link to your impressive bird photos?


Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds (external link)
Over 260 species captured in habitat, and counting.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timbop
Goldmember
Avatar
2,980 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 18
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
     
Sep 15, 2009 05:46 |  #24

Excellent shot Romy; it definitely shows how much lattitude for cropping that this camera gives you. I noticed it was in spot AF - can you at least share your experience with that? Is it much slower to lock AF, or does it cause the lens to hunt first? To me this is the selling feature of this camera. For situations just like this having a smaller AF point it ideal, but other times (poor light) having the larger af sensor is better. This technique could actually work out better than having assist points


Current: 5DM3, 6D, 8mm fish, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/2.8IS, 85/1.8, 100-400/IS v1, lensbaby composer with edge 80, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 80D, 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70/2.8, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/4IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ccp900
Goldmember
1,569 posts
Likes: 144
Joined Jun 2006
     
Sep 15, 2009 05:46 |  #25

dude you have to understand romy is one of our kings of bird photography....hes not here to showcase his bird photos....hes trying to show the 7d resolution....


[Sony A7R Mark 3 | Sony A7S | Sony Zeiss 16-35m f/4.0 | Sony FE 85m f1.8 | Sony FE 20m f1.8 G | Samyang 18m f2.8 | Samyang 45m f1.8 | Zeiss Batis 40m f2 | Sony FE 28m f2 | Sony Zeiss 55m f1.8 | Sony FE 28-70m f/3.5-5.6 | Helios 44-2 | Helios 44-3 | Nikon 105m f/2.5 AIS | Contax Zeiss Planar 50m f1.7 | Contax Zeiss Planar 100m f2 | Voigtlander Nokton 40m f/1.4 | Canon 24-105m f/4.0L | Canon 85m f/1.8 | Sigma 30m f/1.4 | Canon 10-22m f/3.5-4.5 | Canon 100m f/2.8 Macro USM | Canon 580 EX Ver 1.0]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 15, 2009 05:49 |  #26

Hogster86 wrote in post #8646917 (external link)
I can't see an issue myself, considering the image in the first post was cropped from this!


What more can you expect?

David :confused:

PS. Great job Romy! :)

Agreed, the crop is from 1/4th of the overall frame, and that looks quite good. It is great to know that I can pull out 1/4th of the overall shot, and still be able to print a 5x7 or even larger. Here is a combined perspective to get the idea across.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liquidstone
THREAD ­ STARTER
insane Bird photographer
Avatar
1,089 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 15, 2009 06:13 |  #27

liquidstone wrote in post #8647020 (external link)
Thanks for your comments. Care to share a link to your impressive bird photos?

I took a look at the bird photos you posted at POTN and now, I'm enlightened with your impressive and stellar work. Here are a few of my favorite bird photos of yours.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=325353

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=301008

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=313830

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=311619


Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds (external link)
Over 260 species captured in habitat, and counting.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liquidstone
THREAD ­ STARTER
insane Bird photographer
Avatar
1,089 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 15, 2009 06:16 |  #28

timbop wrote in post #8647030 (external link)
Excellent shot Romy; it definitely shows how much lattitude for cropping that this camera gives you. I noticed it was in spot AF - can you at least share your experience with that? Is it much slower to lock AF, or does it cause the lens to hunt first? To me this is the selling feature of this camera. For situations just like this having a smaller AF point it ideal, but other times (poor light) having the larger af sensor is better. This technique could actually work out better than having assist points

It seems to me that Spot AF works very fast at static subjects.


Romy Ocon, Philippine Wild Birds (external link)
Over 260 species captured in habitat, and counting.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
Avatar
3,149 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Mesa,AZ
     
Sep 15, 2009 06:20 |  #29

liquidstone wrote in post #8647020 (external link)
Thanks for your comments. Care to share a link to your impressive bird photos?

I didn't claim to have any. I think I have a good eye for it though. But since you ask you can look here: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/neoview (external link)

Here are some of my favorites there:

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/neoview/3367714​522/ (external link)

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/neoview/3359273​666/ (external link)

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/neoview/3367714​236/ (external link)

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/neoview/3358435​547/ (external link)

Are you claiming that image was an impressive image? IMO if you put that image up on Naturescapes you would get a fair amount of criticism for it. I know I've posted some of mine there and have been ripped apart.

Edit: I wasn't trying to sound rude, I just felt that if that image was attempting to show off the prowess of the 7D that it failed. I think that it can do very well though from what I've seen.

BTW not sure if your last comment was sarcastic or not.

Edit 2: And after having looked at your other bird work it sure seems you do much better work and I don't think you'd argue with me on that.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tekkie
Goldmember
Avatar
2,621 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Clarkston, MI
     
Sep 15, 2009 06:21 |  #30

Romy for the AF can you compare it to a 40/50D or a 1D MKII / MKIII ?

currently I have a 40D & a 1D MKII I like the 40D but the AI Servo is to darn slow, the 1D MKII is super fast but with only 8MP and not the greatest noise control doing cropping can be a problem

I pre ordered the 7D but I am super stoked to hear about the AF system, especially for tracking BIF :)


Canon 1DMKII, 7D, 5DMKII, 1D MKII
Canon 500L, 100-400L
, 70-200 2.8L, 17-40L, 24-105L, 24mm 2.8,50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 135mm 2.8 SF, 100mm Macro
Canon 430 & 580 flashes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

28,808 views & 0 likes for this thread, 62 members have posted to it.
Feather detail with a beta 7D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1050 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.