I don't get the need for caps...
Cuz it gives you more POWAR!!!

Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:21 | #6136 The Moose wrote in post #9143834 I don't get the need for caps... Cuz it gives you more POWAR!!! Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:24 | #6137 The Moose wrote in post #9143850 Makes sense. I've loved my 70-200 even more since I've had my 1D2. That extra bit of width makes such a difference. But at the same time, I can't wait to have my 24-70. The 70-200 is nice to use but it's always too long If I stuck with APS-C (which I very well may have, through the 7D, if I didn't get the 1D2) then I would definitely have gone for the 17-55 rather than the 24-70. A cousin-in-law has the 17-55 and it's a very nice lens. I'm hoping Canon releases a 24-70 f/2.8 IS next year. Would be nice. Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustinLawrence Goldmember 2,497 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: SYdney, AUstralia More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:30 | #6138 amsm wrote in post #9143022 Nice, I'm sure you'll love it. I have the older 28-70 f2.8 and it's a total ripper of a lens, even better on the 1D MKII than on the 400D. Good for building upper-body strength too, especially on the 1D ![]() Collin85 wrote in post #9143862 I'm hoping Canon releases a 24-70 f/2.8 IS next year. Would be nice. There is a current rumour that Canon has a f/2 zoom in the works - quite alot of people are speculating a 35-70 f/2. Not going to speculate on accuracy since it's just a rumour, but interesting nonetheless. 35-70 f/2. that would be one massive lens. Justin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheMoose Cream of the Crop 5,106 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:30 | #6139 Collin85 wrote in post #9143862 I'm hoping Canon releases a 24-70 f/2.8 IS next year. Would be nice. There is a current rumour that Canon has a f/2 zoom in the works - quite alot of people are speculating a 35-70 f/2. Not going to speculate on accuracy since it's just a rumour, but interesting nonetheless. Man, that would be a heavy bastard. And a pricey one, you would think. A 24-70L with the new Hybrid IS is much more likely though.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fungry Goldmember 2,225 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Sydney/Shanghai More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:33 | #6140 The Moose wrote in post #9143850 Makes sense. I've loved my 70-200 even more since I've had my 1D2. That extra bit of width makes such a difference. But at the same time, I can't wait to have my 24-70. The 70-200 is nice to use but it's always too long I love the 70-200 focal range on the 1D2. Gorgeous stuff. Oh wait, I said all this already haven't I The Moose wrote in post #9143877 Man, that would be a heavy bastard. And a pricey one, you would think. A 24-70L with the new Hybrid IS is much more likely though. That IS the rumor, the 35-70 IS variant. FL ranges don't always stay the same Ed - Gear List - www.edkhou.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:38 | #6141 JustinLawrence wrote in post #9143876 35-70 f/2. that would be one massive lens. Yep. Love what someone said upon hearing this rumour the other day; went somewhere along the lines of "Wow, awesome. Here's to hoping it's gonna be much lighter than the 24-70L." Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheMoose Cream of the Crop 5,106 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:48 | #6142 fungry wrote in post #9143881 I love the 70-200 focal range on the 1D2. Gorgeous stuff. Oh wait, I said all this already haven't I ![]() 450D days: 90% 17-40 1D2: 20% 17-40 ![]() That IS the rumor, the 35-70 IS variant. FL ranges don't always stay the same ![]() If they make it a 35-70mm f/2L IS USM... I'm not sure how much they'd sell
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcminty Goldmember 1,250 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Dec 06, 2009 03:49 | #6143 Evening everyone The photo consists of 7 vertical shots, merged in CS4. Andrew || Flickr!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BOSS Gone, but not forgotten 2,610 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 Location: QLD,Australia More info | Permanent banTax time,here is my brunch today and it was delicious. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JustinLawrence Goldmember 2,497 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2008 Location: SYdney, AUstralia More info | Dec 06, 2009 04:03 | #6145 ^ nothing better than eggs bene! Justin
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcminty Goldmember 1,250 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Dec 06, 2009 04:06 | #6146 It sure looks delicious JustinLawrence wrote in post #9143939 Also, nice work with the pano Andrew, talk about working under pressure. Thanks Andrew || Flickr!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BOSS Gone, but not forgotten 2,610 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2007 Location: QLD,Australia More info | Permanent banWith the pano good job,glad it was you and not me. John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alexanderGARDNER Goldmember 3,540 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Dec 06, 2009 04:21 | #6148 Andrew that's a good pano even before you consider the situation. ALEXANDER GARDNER
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mcminty Goldmember 1,250 posts Joined Jun 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Dec 06, 2009 04:40 | #6149 BOSS wrote in post #9143957 With the pano good job,glad it was you and not me. Hahaha thanks Really? I've shot very few panos before, and one or two practice ones before the parade began. Heh, both the practice ones had some weird horizontal curvature (like straight straight straight then cuuuuurve on one side), so I must have gotten rather lucky here Andrew || Flickr!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alexanderGARDNER Goldmember 3,540 posts Likes: 8 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Dec 06, 2009 04:44 | #6150 mcminty wrote in post #9143986 Hahaha thanks Really? I've shot very few panos before, and one or two practice ones before the parade began. Heh, both the practice ones had some weird horizontal curvature (like straight straight straight then cuuuuurve on one side), so I must have gotten rather lucky here ![]() You're shooting at noon as well so that sucked for creative lighting! ALEXANDER GARDNER
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2152 guests, 123 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||