POTN Aussie Club #7 - Feng, where's my invoice?

jonoxplor wrote in post #9362204
Sorry, by no means did I mean to rip on Olympus. Truth be known I'd buy one of their tough cameras, but I'd rather spend the money on new lenses.. I just found it funny to believe that my sister had managed to kill it.

Mmmm Ok fair enough, will keep that link in a safe space.

All good.

I love that Olympus ad where he skips the camera across but the second guy attempts to and it falls in. Hilarious.

mickeyjuice wrote in post #9362219
Same here. (Once I've got these bits for the S90. Oh, and I just bought a TT1 and a cable so I can remotely trigger the camera with it

Don't forget the 1Ds Mark III I keep meaning to buy a remote trigger off eBay because they're only $25 or so but whenever I think about it, I don't do it because I can't see how it's even worth keeping one in the kit. It's not like I have a decent tripod to go with it (i.e. to use the tripod and the trigger to get some long exposures) so I'll wait for that.

BOSS wrote in post #9362066
Pics or it didn't happen.

I'm on it John, will have them tonight.

The Moose wrote in post #9362283
Don't forget the 1Ds Mark III

That's well behind lights.

The Moose wrote in post #9362266
The first shot (IMG_0861) definitely seems much better from DPP. A tad underexposed but the whole shot looks so much better. The LR shot looked like a big mess of OOF/JPEG artifacts but the DPP shot is clear and nice throughout. The birds shot has a massive difference too and looks much better out of DPP. The lighthouse one is also better but it seems less significant than the others.

I'm actually really liking that birds shot, Andrew! Great work.

So you understand my concern. Its a high(ish) spec 18Mpx DSLR shooting through a 70-200F4L IS (one of Canons sharpest zooms) and they look like crap. Especially compared to the old 5D shooting through a 24-70L.

AndrewOz wrote in post #9362329
So you understand my concern. Its a high(ish) spec 18Mpx DSLR shooting through a 70-200F4L IS (one of Canons sharpest zooms) and they look like crap. Especially compared to the old 5D shooting through a 24-70L.

Of course. One of my mates has had his 7D for a week or so now and I believe he's using the LR3 beta rather than LR2.6 so I'll direct him to this thread and see what his take is, seeing as he's actually got a 7D. I'll try and persuade him to install DPP to compare for you

mickeyjuice wrote in post #9362138
OK, I just gave him a kicking.

Your leading me astray on this forum.

Old Fart wrote in post #9362427
Your leading me astray on this forum.

You need to take responsibility for your own actions.

A free life lesson from the juice.

(ie "don't blame me!")

Back from a lovely day on the beach at Anglesea watching the big kids play...tax time

I know this one's not perfect (too sharp on the left of frame), but it would be too hard to crop and I still quite like it

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

amsm wrote in post #9362452
Rope and Reel

Nice.

New gear tax:

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

S7000 wrote in post #9362545
New gear tax:

Nice

mickeyjuice wrote in post #9362595
Nice

Getting an interesting image of a tripod isn't as easy as it looks.

S7000 wrote in post #9362620
Getting an interesting image of a tripod isn't as easy as it looks.

Hey, yer talking to a bloke who has to get an interesting image of SOMETHING for every day of the year! NOTHING is as easy as it looks!

You and all the other 365ers. Good luck Juice!

S7000 wrote in post #9362655
You and all the other 365ers. Good luck Juice!

Yeah, ta. Spewing I missed that one earlier today...