Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 17 Sep 2009 (Thursday) 21:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best workflow for RGB TIFFs and sRGB for web?

 
Lightchaser
Senior Member
Avatar
394 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: BOP, New Zealand - Land of the Long White Cloud
     
Sep 17, 2009 21:52 |  #1

I have about 200 products that need to be supplied as RGB TIFFS, and then as sRGB jpegs for web.

I'm processing them in ACR and can export them to TIFFS from there, no problems. I then batch processed them in CS3 to sRGB jpegs and some, as expected, have changed colour a bit with the conversion.

Ideally it would've been good to be able to edit in sRGB from ACR so I could see what colour they'd be before outputting in sRGB. Since that's not an option (unless I've missed something?) is there another way to edit in sRGB more quickly than going into the TIFFS one by one in PS?


1DMkIII, 40D, 580EXII, 70-200f 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 50mm 1.8 and f2.5 macro, 10-22mm.
"We see what we know 'till we know who we are. Then we see what we feel." Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 17, 2009 22:19 |  #2

This all seems a bit strange.

Firstly, you say they're required as "RGB Tiffs". Well, sRGB is a form of RGB, so you're absolutely fine. Assuming, that is, that the instructions you've been given are simply to stop you from providing CMYK files.

However, I suspect you mean "Adobe RGB" - a lot of people make this mistake, and it drives me up the wall (external link).

Ok, so where are you supplying these images to? Did they specifically say "Adobe RGB" or just "RGB"?

You can, of course, batch process your Adobe RGB files down to sRGB, but you risk colour clipping in some, as you mentioned. Personally, I'd process them all in sRGB, then batch convert to Adobe RGB. Your client will be none the wiser, I promise you.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 17, 2009 22:21 |  #3

The request for Tiff files also makes me suspect that your client doesn't know what they're talking about. For most purposes, maximum quality Jpegs are just as good, and much smaller.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightchaser
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
394 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: BOP, New Zealand - Land of the Long White Cloud
     
Sep 17, 2009 22:36 |  #4

Thanks for your reply Damo. Sorry for driving you up the wall. Their designer's asked that files be supplied as RGB Tiffs. I'm exporting them from ACR as Adobe RGB TIFFS.

There is some colour shift from there to sRGB, which is the next step - is there a way to check/adjust the colour for eachfile now without having to go into them one by one in PS?


1DMkIII, 40D, 580EXII, 70-200f 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 50mm 1.8 and f2.5 macro, 10-22mm.
"We see what we know 'till we know who we are. Then we see what we feel." Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 17, 2009 23:08 |  #5

Wait! Wait! That's exactly my point. If the designer has stated "RGB Tiffs" then sRGB is fine.

Designers, in the main, are ignorant of these matters. They get told once in college that such-and-such should be such-and-such, and without any genuine understanding, they cling to those instructions blindly.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 17, 2009 23:10 |  #6

Having said all that, if you've already made Adobe RGB conversions, then no, I don't know of a way to safely batch convert.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 18, 2009 00:05 |  #7

You can do both in ACR -- just open the Preferences (click the link at the bottom or the button at the top). Change the color space from Adobe RGB to sRGB (probably what the tiff people want unless they specify Adobe RGB). Then you can save as a tiff, and you can save as a jpeg, and they should come out fine.

The only thing you have to find out is whether the tiff people want 16 bit tiffs or 8 bit tiffs. If you don't know, you should probably make sure to set the tiffs to 16 bits. You can set this in the Preferences as well.

Be aware that any changes made in the Preferences are "sticky", meaning that for a "normal" workflow from ACR to PS, you might want to change the 8 bit back to 16 bit and the sRGB back to Adobe if that's what you're used to.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 18, 2009 00:41 |  #8

Tony, I think you're being incredibly charitable. I doubt Lightchaser's designer has ever heard of bit depth, and is clinging rigidly to "somebody once told me that tiffs are better than jpegs".


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightchaser
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
394 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: BOP, New Zealand - Land of the Long White Cloud
     
Sep 18, 2009 00:56 |  #9

Thanks Tony. Am I right in saying though that you can't preview the end colour as you're working on the file - because the colour is assigned on exporting - is that right?


1DMkIII, 40D, 580EXII, 70-200f 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 50mm 1.8 and f2.5 macro, 10-22mm.
"We see what we know 'till we know who we are. Then we see what we feel." Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 18, 2009 01:07 |  #10

Damo77 wrote in post #8664160 (external link)
Tony, I think you're being incredibly charitable. I doubt Lightchaser's designer has ever heard of bit depth, and is clinging rigidly to "somebody once told me that tiffs are better than jpegs".

My point about setting an 8 bit depth in ACR was that the software being used by the designer might not support 16 bits or they may not be used to working with 16 bits. But, if they specify a 16 bit tiff then that's the way to go.

Lightchaser wrote in post #8664203 (external link)
Thanks Tony. Am I right in saying though that you can't preview the end colour as you're working on the file - because the colour is assigned on exporting - is that right?

Really, if you set sRGB as your ACR preference you should be fine for both Saving As a tiff or a jpeg. Like I said, you will likely need to set your bit depth at 8 bits in so the tiff unless your client specifies they are capable of working with 16 bits.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 18, 2009 01:24 |  #11

Develop again from RAW in sRgb. Or batch from ARgb to sRgb using image processor.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Sep 18, 2009 01:32 |  #12

tonylong wrote in post #8664231 (external link)
My point about setting an 8 bit depth in ACR was that the software being used by the designer might not support 16 bits or they may not be used to working with 16 bits. But, if they specify a 16 bit tiff then that's the way to go.

Oh yes, I know, and I agree with you. All I'm saying is, I suspect this designer to be as ignorant as most of his kind (that I've encountered), and wouldn't know 16-bit if you beat him over the head with it.


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 18, 2009 07:51 |  #13

Lightchaser wrote in post #8664203 (external link)
Thanks Tony. Am I right in saying though that you can't preview the end colour as you're working on the file - because the colour is assigned on exporting - is that right?

No.
ACR will show you what you get. If the output color space is changed, so is the preview and the histogram (unlike in Lightroom (external link)).

In PS you can softproof for sRGB.
However, in most cases, you won't see a big shift when going from AdobeRGB to sRGB: In quite a lot of images there are few colors outside sRGB, and the conversion is relative colorimetric. So only the colors out of sRGB gamut will be clipped.

Your screen likely has a gamut of about sRGB or smaller, so the colors that are outside sRGB gamut were not visible on your screen anyhow.

If you see a big change when converting AdobeRGB to sRGB you either work on very saturated images using a Wide Gamut monitor, or you are assigning instead of converting...


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lightchaser
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
394 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Location: BOP, New Zealand - Land of the Long White Cloud
     
Sep 18, 2009 13:49 |  #14

René Damkot wrote in post #8665090 (external link)
No.
ACR will show you what you get. If the output color space is changed, so is the preview and the histogram (unlike in Lightroom (external link)).

In PS you can softproof for sRGB.
However, in most cases, you won't see a big shift when going from AdobeRGB to sRGB: In quite a lot of images there are few colors outside sRGB, and the conversion is relative colorimetric. So only the colors out of sRGB gamut will be clipped.

Your screen likely has a gamut of about sRGB or smaller, so the colors that are outside sRGB gamut were not visible on your screen anyhow.

If you see a big change when converting AdobeRGB to sRGB you either work on very saturated images using a Wide Gamut monitor, or you are assigning instead of converting...

Brilliant. Answers the question exactly. Thanks so much :D


1DMkIII, 40D, 580EXII, 70-200f 2.8L, 24-70 2.8L, 50mm 1.8 and f2.5 macro, 10-22mm.
"We see what we know 'till we know who we are. Then we see what we feel." Ernst Haas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,600 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Best workflow for RGB TIFFs and sRGB for web?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
894 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.