I like the shallow DOF on the video, but for some scenes I need a far deeper DOF. How can I increase it to have say an interview of someone sitting in front of a bookshelf with both in focus?
motoroller Senior Member 474 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Near London More info | Sep 20, 2009 06:35 | #1 I like the shallow DOF on the video, but for some scenes I need a far deeper DOF. How can I increase it to have say an interview of someone sitting in front of a bookshelf with both in focus? Current: 5d III | 1Ds3 | 5d II gripped | 40d | 17-40L | 24-105L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100 f/2 | 70-200L f/2.8 | 430EX |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheMoose Cream of the Crop 5,106 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2009 More info | Sep 20, 2009 07:09 | #2 Change your aperture and increase your ISO to achieve the same exposure, just as you would for a photo. Anything you do for a photo is directly applicable to video because a video is just a bunch of photos strung together.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ShauningtoN Senior Member 540 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia More info | Sep 20, 2009 07:12 | #3 Right you are, Glenn. That's a good way of putting it. If it requires 1/60th, F10 and ISO 800 to get the correct DoF and exposure that you require in a PHOTO of your interview, you can probbaly guess what settings you'll need for your video. A few bodies and lenses..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JPMPhotography Senior Member 603 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Sep 20, 2009 13:27 | #4 ShauningtoN wrote in post #8675259 *wants 5d mk II* *agreeds* 60D gripped, T2i gripped, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Pentax SMC 50 f/1.4, Nikon Standard Speed Set: 24, 35, 85, 105, 135, 180, Canon 580ex, Calumet Genesis 200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gnats50 Member 84 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Sep 25, 2009 14:16 | #5 what about moving the camera further away from subject? DOF increases as the focus distance increases, am I wrong?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlphaChicken Knot Hank 3,569 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Asheville, NC More info | Sep 25, 2009 15:03 | #6 gnats50 wrote in post #8708775 what about moving the camera further away from subject? DOF increases as the focus distance increases, am I wrong? nope. I am sure there are other factors, but this is generally true. I am Henry. NOT Hank. And certainly not a length of rope tied in a knot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NickJushchyshyn Senior Member 289 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Philadelphia, PA More info | Sep 25, 2009 15:47 | #7 gnats50 wrote in post #8708775 what about moving the camera further away from subject? DOF increases as the focus distance increases, am I wrong? Actually, it's generally the other way around.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlphaChicken Knot Hank 3,569 posts Joined Aug 2007 Location: Asheville, NC More info | Sep 25, 2009 16:05 | #8 NickJushchyshyn wrote in post #8709263 Actually, it's generally the other way around. In fact, many video camera users deliberately move their cameras away from the subject to use a longer lens setting to get a SHALLOWER depth of field. (or "increased" DOF effect .. a phrase that could lead to confusion) i do not think this is correct. using a longer lens will result in having to move further back and will give a more shallow DoF due to telephoto compression. I am Henry. NOT Hank. And certainly not a length of rope tied in a knot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
basroil Cream of the Crop 8,015 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2006 Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ More info | Sep 25, 2009 16:41 | #9 NickJushchyshyn wrote in post #8709263 Actually, it's generally the other way around. In fact, many video camera users deliberately move their cameras away from the subject to use a longer lens setting to get a SHALLOWER depth of field. (or "increased" DOF effect .. a phrase that could lead to confusion) Quite wrong. Increasing distance to subject increases DOF. Increasing focal length decreases. However, for a given framing and aperture size, the increase in focal length matches 1:1 the increase in distance, and results in the exact same DOF. The reason you go back and shoot long is to take advantage of the compression effect, not to mess with DOF. For a given frame, the only thing that changes DOF is the aperture. I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
livinglight Member 35 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Sep 29, 2009 20:48 | #10 You could get a 7D. Instantly more DOF. Josh Marshall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Monkeytoes 1333 guests, 182 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||