Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Video and Sound Editing 
Thread started 20 Sep 2009 (Sunday) 06:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5d2 DOF limit - what's the limit

 
motoroller
Senior Member
474 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Near London
     
Sep 20, 2009 06:35 |  #1

I like the shallow DOF on the video, but for some scenes I need a far deeper DOF. How can I increase it to have say an interview of someone sitting in front of a bookshelf with both in focus?


Current: 5d III | 1Ds3 | 5d II gripped | 40d | 17-40L | 24-105L | 50mm f/1.4 | 100 f/2 | 70-200L f/2.8 | 430EX |
Previously: 10d, 40d, 5d2, 14mm Tamron f/2.8, 16-35L, 100 Macro
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Moose
Cream of the Crop
5,106 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2009
     
Sep 20, 2009 07:09 |  #2

Change your aperture and increase your ISO to achieve the same exposure, just as you would for a photo. Anything you do for a photo is directly applicable to video because a video is just a bunch of photos strung together.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ShauningtoN
Senior Member
Avatar
540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Sep 20, 2009 07:12 |  #3

Right you are, Glenn. That's a good way of putting it. If it requires 1/60th, F10 and ISO 800 to get the correct DoF and exposure that you require in a PHOTO of your interview, you can probbaly guess what settings you'll need for your video. :)

*wants 5d mk II*


A few bodies and lenses..

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JPM ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
603 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 20, 2009 13:27 |  #4

ShauningtoN wrote in post #8675259 (external link)
*wants 5d mk II*

*agreeds*


60D gripped, T2i gripped, Tokina 12-24 f/4, Pentax SMC 50 f/1.4, Nikon Standard Speed Set: 24, 35, 85, 105, 135, 180, Canon 580ex, Calumet Genesis 200
jpmphotovideo.com (external link)
Please check out my film resume (external link) and contact me if you need a DP, AC, or PA for an Atlanta-based shoot.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gnats50
Member
Avatar
84 posts
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 25, 2009 14:16 |  #5

what about moving the camera further away from subject? DOF increases as the focus distance increases, am I wrong?


http://www.drakephilya​w.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlphaChicken
Knot Hank
Avatar
3,569 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
     
Sep 25, 2009 15:03 |  #6

gnats50 wrote in post #8708775 (external link)
what about moving the camera further away from subject? DOF increases as the focus distance increases, am I wrong?

nope. I am sure there are other factors, but this is generally true.


I am Henry. NOT Hank. And certainly not a length of rope tied in a knot. ;)
My family calls me Hen, but you can call me Chicken. See you out there!
|Deviant Art (external link)
|Facebook (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NickJushchyshyn
Senior Member
289 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
     
Sep 25, 2009 15:47 |  #7

gnats50 wrote in post #8708775 (external link)
what about moving the camera further away from subject? DOF increases as the focus distance increases, am I wrong?

Actually, it's generally the other way around.
In fact, many video camera users deliberately move their cameras away from the subject to use a longer lens setting to get a SHALLOWER depth of field. (or "increased" DOF effect .. a phrase that could lead to confusion)


www.techvantics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AlphaChicken
Knot Hank
Avatar
3,569 posts
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Asheville, NC
     
Sep 25, 2009 16:05 |  #8

NickJushchyshyn wrote in post #8709263 (external link)
Actually, it's generally the other way around.
In fact, many video camera users deliberately move their cameras away from the subject to use a longer lens setting to get a SHALLOWER depth of field. (or "increased" DOF effect .. a phrase that could lead to confusion)

i do not think this is correct. using a longer lens will result in having to move further back and will give a more shallow DoF due to telephoto compression.

However, I believe that if you shoot with a telephoto--say the 85mm f/1.2L--from MFD, the DoF extending from behind the focus point will be more shallow than if you were to stand 20 feet away from MFD using the same lens.


I am Henry. NOT Hank. And certainly not a length of rope tied in a knot. ;)
My family calls me Hen, but you can call me Chicken. See you out there!
|Deviant Art (external link)
|Facebook (external link)|Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Sep 25, 2009 16:41 |  #9

NickJushchyshyn wrote in post #8709263 (external link)
Actually, it's generally the other way around.
In fact, many video camera users deliberately move their cameras away from the subject to use a longer lens setting to get a SHALLOWER depth of field. (or "increased" DOF effect .. a phrase that could lead to confusion)

Quite wrong. Increasing distance to subject increases DOF. Increasing focal length decreases. However, for a given framing and aperture size, the increase in focal length matches 1:1 the increase in distance, and results in the exact same DOF. The reason you go back and shoot long is to take advantage of the compression effect, not to mess with DOF. For a given frame, the only thing that changes DOF is the aperture.

Now, when you shoot long, that means you likely have a fairly large distance between the subject and the background as well, and that can lead to better OOF sections, though the DOF is the same.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
livinglight
Member
35 posts
Joined May 2008
     
Sep 29, 2009 20:48 |  #10

You could get a 7D. Instantly more DOF. :)


Josh Marshall
Newcastle Wedding Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,231 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
5d2 DOF limit - what's the limit
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Video and Sound Editing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1333 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.