Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 25 May 2005 (Wednesday) 02:08
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

100-400L sample shots required....

 
Marty_Oz
Senior Member
Avatar
400 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: North East - England
     
May 25, 2005 02:08 |  #1

Hi,
I really like the range of the 100-400L but just need to see a sample image.
My main use will be surfing shots and candid portraits from a distance.
Could anybody help and post images of the lens at 400mm without cropping the image. I am interested in how much the frame is filled at full zoom.
Also if you could give an estimate of distance from the subject, like at the waters edge or closer on rocks.
All images or info will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks


I Like Pressing Buttons......

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MAD ­ DOG
Member
231 posts
Joined May 2005
     
May 25, 2005 07:20 |  #2

Sorry Marty_Oz.

I wish I had this lens to post a pic for you.

I must say I'm a little dismayed that you have had a response from any other members.

Come on guy 'n' gals, help him out. I'd rather like to see some too, so that I can dream.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andrew ­ Pratt
Senior Member
Avatar
449 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB Canada
     
May 25, 2005 07:22 |  #3

Go to pbase and do a search on that lens or view the wildlife forum here...its full of 100-400L photo's


Canon Rebel XT, Kit lens & SD800IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RbrtPtikLeoSeny
My love, my baby
2,482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Mont Vernon, NH
     
May 25, 2005 08:02 |  #4

Um, well, here's one that I found posted by another member.

https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=75488

There are plenty more out there though. Peeps use this lens a lot. Just look around, and while your doing so hopefully some peeps will start posting their 100-400L pics here. :-)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Turbowolf
Senior Member
Avatar
540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA (TESC)
     
May 25, 2005 08:53 as a reply to  @ RbrtPtikLeoSeny's post |  #5

Everything on my website was done with the 100-400. It was that or the kit lens and all I shoot is wildlife, well, maybe the occasional mountain or volcano, but 99.28943% of the time it's wildlife. So for me the kit lens is nothing more than a paperweight on my desk.

So you want examples? Check out my website.
http://academic.evergr​een.edu/s/stidav22/ (external link)


Dave
My Wildlife Photography (external link) / My Gear List
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Poking roadkill with a stick is not research ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RbrtPtikLeoSeny
My love, my baby
2,482 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Mont Vernon, NH
     
May 25, 2005 10:23 |  #6

Turbowolf, all I have to say is WOOOOAAHHH!!!!!! I have never seen so many fantastic wild life shots in my life! Most pics I see are taken at the zoo! These are amazing! I am sooooo envious! I've never seen a bald eagle, a wild bear or wolf, not even a hawk up close. You, you've taken brilliant pictures of them all! That is just so cool!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,887 posts
Likes: 22
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
May 25, 2005 11:04 |  #7

If you click through a number of shots are in captivity, at least the ones I looked at: wolf and bears.

Dave, I assume they are generally cropped and taken at 300-400mm primarily. Could you kindly give an indication if that's the case (or not) so people appreciate what length zoom (or prime) is useful to get decent non captive wildlife shots. There is no EXIF data to go one or I'd have checked it.

Also, be interest to know if you use a tripod or monopod, or whether the IS is good enough for most situations.


https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lordjim
Senior Member
293 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Montreal
     
May 25, 2005 11:24 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #8

I rented a 100-400L for a week end. It is an amazing lens, some of the pics in the links attached on pbase (nature gallery) were taken handheld with a 100-400L at 400mm. It was a really dark day and still I find the results great (considering I am still a beginner in photography). I would recommend that you try to rent it before buying as it is significant expense. It is an heavy lens and some people dislike the push-pull zoom. I found it convenient but far from perfect (the blocking ring is annoying as you need your two hands to use it). Also, I have read that some people had issues with the IS and USM motors so I would recommend that you make sure that the lens is covered by a good warranty before buying it. Unfortunately, I have never tried the Sigma 50-500 or the new Tamron 200-500 which are supposed to be the "affordable" alternatives to the 100-400 so I can not compare. Hope that helps. Good luck.


/Alex (aka Lordjim)

My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Boudreaux
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
18 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
     
May 25, 2005 11:29 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #9

Here is a picture using the 100-400mm, taken at 400mm. IS0 800. Just realized that I didn't clean up the noise in these pics. :o

http://kfalcon.smugmug​.com/gallery/544750/3/​22603405 (external link)

The pics in the latter part of the gallery are using the 100-400. Early pics are using the 70-200mm IS

Hope this helps.


Boudreaux

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
     
May 25, 2005 11:43 as a reply to  @ Boudreaux's post |  #10

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/scottbergerphoto/image/20905204.jpg
More at: http://www.pbase.com …erphoto/faces_i​n_the_park (external link)

One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dannym
Member
201 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: Virginia, USA
     
May 25, 2005 13:03 as a reply to  @ scottbergerphoto's post |  #11

Here you go. Little critter was moving about 30mph, handheld, @ 400mm with IS on. You can't go wrong with this lens. Hope this helps.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

Danny
10D, 28-135 IS, 100-400 IS L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
flyfishnj
Senior Member
363 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: NJ
     
May 25, 2005 14:35 as a reply to  @ dannym's post |  #12

This is another great lens. Here is a sample shot when I bought it for myself for christmas.

Handheld
1/60 sec
f 5.6
135 mm
iso 400
flash fired

The push pull zoom does not bother me in any way. I personally have no problems with it and find no transitional problems switching from convetional turn zoom lenes and this lens.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


~John~

60D w/ grip | 10D w/ grip | Tamron 19-35 f/3.5-4.5 | Canon 50 f/1.8 | Canon 28-135 f/3.5-5.6 IS | Tamron 28-75 XR Di | Canon 70-200 F4 L | Canon 100-400 L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mycroft
Senior Member
Avatar
358 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB Canada
     
May 25, 2005 14:57 as a reply to  @ dannym's post |  #13

dannym wrote:
Here you go. Little critter was moving about 30mph, handheld, @ 400mm with IS on. You can't go wrong with this lens. Hope this helps.

Hah! a T-Maxx!


Canon EOS 40D w/BG-E2, EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 24-70 f/2.8L USM, Sigma AF 70-200mm f/2.8 APO EX HSM, Canon Speedlite 580EX, Manfrotto 055CB tripod w/486RC2 clone ballhead, Opus OPL-M100 strobe w/45" shoothrough umbrella, Lightrein LR4A strobe w/24"x34" softbox
GEAR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quadphoto
Member
179 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: south wales uk
     
May 25, 2005 14:58 as a reply to  @ flyfishnj's post |  #14

This image was taken 1/400 sec @ f5.6 hand held with the image stablizer on,
I thoroughly recommend this lens the image quality is first class. ( Quadphoto )


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Turbowolf
Senior Member
Avatar
540 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Olympia, WA (TESC)
     
May 25, 2005 22:15 as a reply to  @ condyk's post |  #15

condyk wrote:
If you click through a number of shots are in captivity, at least the ones I looked at: wolf and bears.

Dave, I assume they are generally cropped and taken at 300-400mm primarily. Could you kindly give an indication if that's the case (or not) so people appreciate what length zoom (or prime) is useful to get decent non captive wildlife shots. There is no EXIF data to go one or I'd have checked it.

Also, be interest to know if you use a tripod or monopod, or whether the IS is good enough for most situations.


Correct ... most shots are between 300-400mm. I don't use a tripod or monopod as a habit, though I own both. I have found that the IS is more than enough for my normal style of shooting. The few times I have used either 'pod' has been for bird nests, like the Ospreys.

I started shooting in zoo's at between 200mm to 400mm, and since last May when I came across a fox on Mt. Rainier, I have tried to exclusively shoot wild animals - once you see them wild it's never the same seeing them in captivity.

Below is a 100% size image followed by one which is cropped to my normal standard.
EXIF info as follows: 1/500, f/8, 360mm
Distance to animals was approximately 1/8 of a mile.

Hope this helps.


Dave
My Wildlife Photography (external link) / My Gear List
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Poking roadkill with a stick is not research ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,984 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
100-400L sample shots required....
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1028 guests, 111 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.