Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 22 Sep 2009 (Tuesday) 22:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New eBay buy. Was this a good deal?

 
CH_Devin
Senior Member
673 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 110
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Sep 22, 2009 22:46 |  #1

http://cgi.ebay.com …iewItem&item=32​0424717397 (external link)

I talked to the seller and he agreed to sell the lot for $350 plus shipping. I was wondering if this is a good deal or not.

I checked the main list of lenses and I couldn't find the "Canon EF 75-300mm 4-5.6 IS" on the list. Can anyone tell me about this?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KenjiS
"Holy crap its long!"
Avatar
21,439 posts
Gallery: 622 photos
Likes: 3076
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
     
Sep 22, 2009 23:01 |  #2

CH_Devin wrote in post #8692671 (external link)
http://cgi.ebay.com …iewItem&item=32​0424717397 (external link)

I talked to the seller and he agreed to sell the lot for $350 plus shipping. I was wondering if this is a good deal or not.

I checked the main list of lenses and I couldn't find the "Canon EF 75-300mm 4-5.6 IS" on the list. Can anyone tell me about this?

The Canon 75-300 IS was the first IS lens, it was discontinued and replaced by the FAR superior 70-300 IS...

The 75-300 is regarded as being not terribly good optically and generally a waste of money

The 24-85 is alright if i remember right..

Really you paid $350 for two very "ho-hum" lenses...and a flash...if you're still shooting a crop camera, your money would have been better spent on the 55-250 which is a vastly better lens than that old 75-300....and even the 18-55 IS kit id wager is a bit better on a cropper than the 24-85 if only for the fact it has IS and a better range


Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
Wanted: 70-200. Time and good health
Deviantart (external link)
Flickr (This is where my good stuff is!) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JWitmer
Senior Member
Avatar
275 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: California
     
Sep 22, 2009 23:08 |  #3

I would say maybe if it was about half that, you would have gotten a good deal.


Blogspot (external link)
Canon 7D, Canon 20D gripped, Tamron 17-35, Canon 50mm ƒ1.8 II, Canon 35-80 "macro", WTB Canon 70-200 ƒ4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NeoTokyo
Goldmember
Avatar
2,005 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Sacramento Ca, Springfield Mo.
     
Sep 22, 2009 23:43 |  #4

Im sorry for your loss :(

If you still have a chance tell him that you changed your mind.


Check out my flickr! http://www.flickr.com/​photos/crainracing/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CH_Devin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
673 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 110
Joined Sep 2009
Location: San Francisco, CA
     
Sep 22, 2009 23:55 |  #5

Thank goodness it was a verbal agreement. I did not commit to any contract under eBay policy. I no longer plan on going through with this deal. Thank you all for responding.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:00 |  #6

Average price of about 120 bucks each really isn't bad. It's not the deal of the century, but it's not bending you over by any means.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:01 |  #7

Don't listen to those guys. I think you got a great deal. If you don't have a flash or longer lenses you can try them out to see if you like them. Then later you can easily sell the items separately for at least $500.


The 24-85 is a very nice lens and sells for as much as $200......
http://cgi.ebay.ca …3d33&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)
http://cgi.ebay.ca …6afd&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)

This one sold for $142........ http://cgi.ebay.com …&ssPageName=STR​K:MEWAX:IT (external link)

The 75-300 IS is the best of the 75-300 lenses and easily sells for $200...... http://cgi.ebay.ca …7354&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)

The Sigma 500 Super is a great flash and easily sells for $100 or more..... http://cgi.ebay.ca …ab9b&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hegemon
Member
188 posts
Joined Jul 2006
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:01 |  #8

CH_Devin wrote in post #8693001 (external link)
Thank goodness it was a verbal agreement. I did not commit to any contract under eBay policy. I no longer plan on going through with this deal. Thank you all for responding.

lol ............... eBay policy = law, amirite?

but whatever :lol: good luck


dSLR newb
350D
EF-S 18-55
EF 50 f/1.8 mkII
EF 70-200 f/4.0L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaftmaster
Goldmember
Avatar
1,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: above 5000 feet
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:02 |  #9

Actually, other than the fact that the lenses are nothing special you could probably sell all of this for $500 or more. I sold my 75-300 IS lens for $400 on eBay and the 24-85 will probably sell for about $150. Of course, the time it takes to list each item and pay the eBay fees would make it less attractive.


Paul

Gear -- Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shaftmaster
Goldmember
Avatar
1,429 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: above 5000 feet
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:05 |  #10

msowsun wrote in post #8693022 (external link)
I think you got a great deal. You can easily sell the items separately for at least $500.

The 24-85 is a very nice lens and sells for as much as $200 http://cgi.ebay.ca …3d33&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)

The 75-300 IS is the best of the 75-300 lenses and easily sells for $200. http://cgi.ebay.ca …7354&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)

The Sigma 500 Super is a great flash and easily sells for $100 or more. http://cgi.ebay.ca …ab9b&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)

OK, you beat me to it. I agree with this, but I think the 75-300 IS will sell for closer to $300.


Paul

Gear -- Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shayneyasinski
Senior Member
657 posts
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Canada (sask)
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:12 |  #11

that 75-300 IS is a good lens and worth almost the $350 alone !
I had it and it was pretty sharp and the IS worked very well , compare it to the 70-300 non IS and I can see that one being a waste.

the package deal may not be that good for an advanced shooter that knows what to look for but 2 lenses and a flash for $350 is not a total rippoff.

look around ebay and you will see what stuff is worth .


my gear Canon 7D, Canon 5DMK2, 70-200 f2.8 IS, 50mm f1.8, canon 430 speedlight, canon 17-55 2.8 IS, canon 100mm macro sigma 10-20, Canon 17-85 , 60 cokin filters , 2x telecoverter.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:19 |  #12

The OP is new to photography and currently has only a 50D and a 50mm 1.8 II https://photography-on-the.net …php?p=8674193&p​ostcount=1

This is the perfect buy for someone like him, especially if they are on a budget. He can gain experience with this stuff and then move on to better equipment later.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:23 |  #13

I think it is a pretty fair deal. The lenses are all actually above average and the flash is decent. You aren't going to do a whole let better for less than double that price.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Phrasikleia
Goldmember
Avatar
1,828 posts
Likes: 14
Joined May 2008
Location: Based in California and Slovenia
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:28 |  #14

The 75-300 is infamous for being one of the very worst Canon lenses. I borrowed one once and couldn't get a sharp shot out of it at any focal length. Nonetheless, pieced out in a resale, you could probably make your money back.


Photography by Erin Babnik (external link) | Newsletter (external link) | Photo Cascadia Team Member (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3431
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 23, 2009 00:37 |  #15

shayneyasinski wrote in post #8693083 (external link)
that 75-300 IS is a good lens and worth almost the $350 alone !
I had it and it was pretty sharp and the IS worked very well , compare it to the 70-300 non IS and I can see that one being a waste.

there is no 70-300mm non IS

msowsun wrote in post #8693127 (external link)
This is the perfect buy for someone like him, especially if they are on a budget. He can gain experience with this stuff and then move on to better equipment later.

i think a better use of money would be 18-55mmIS and 55-250mm IS...yeah he'd miss out on the flash...but that's it...he'd have a lot wider of a walk around lens too...plus better i.q....and IS from 18-250mm

he could pick up this flash too:
http://cgi.ebay.com …b299&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)

and only be spending about $30-40 bucks more than the original $350 offer


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,538 views & 0 likes for this thread, 15 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
New eBay buy. Was this a good deal?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1032 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.