Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Sep 2009 (Wednesday) 22:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

300mm f/4 L IS much noisier than IS on 100-400L?

 
Rudi
Goldmember
Avatar
3,751 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2002
Location: Australia
     
Sep 23, 2009 22:35 |  #1

Hi everyone,

Picked myself up a 300mm f/4 L IS yesterday. I used to own the non-IS version of this lens, as well as the 300mm f/2.8 IS version, and the 100-400L. What struck me is how noisy the IS is on this lens when it first kicks in. It sounds like someone dropping a dime into a tin bucket! I have heard that the IS on the 300/4 L is noisier than most, but does this sound about right? (No pun intended :)).


• Wedding Photographer - Sydney and Wollongong (external link)
• Borrowed Moment (blog) (external link)

Life is uncertain. Eat dessert first.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Sep 23, 2009 23:30 |  #2

Normal. The IS generation on the 300 f4 IS is relatively old, and it does do a little "clunk" action upon activation. No worries, enjoy the terrific lens!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
halitime
Goldmember
Avatar
1,271 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Lantzville B.C. Can.
     
Sep 23, 2009 23:38 |  #3

Mine works beautifully but clunks.After acouple of weeks you will barley notice it.


Gear List : 1D MK II n,Gripped XSi,70-200 f4,300 f4 IS,Canon 24-105 f4,35 f2 IS,EF 50 1.8 MK I,EF-S 10-22,Canon 1.4 II Extender,Canon 25mm Ext Tube,YN 468/460 II,RF 602's
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/halitime/sets/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Sep 24, 2009 00:31 as a reply to  @ halitime's post |  #4

It's the original "cash for clunker"...but oh what a clunker it is! :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Neilyb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,200 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Munich
     
Sep 24, 2009 01:33 |  #5

I found the copy of the 300 I had clunked alot, and the AF was just as bad.


http://natureimmortal.​blogspot.com (external link)

http://www.natureimmor​tal.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Sep 24, 2009 02:31 |  #6

Rudi wrote in post #8699181 (external link)
Hi everyone,

Picked myself up a 300mm f/4 L IS yesterday. I used to own the non-IS version of this lens, as well as the 300mm f/2.8 IS version, and the 100-400L. What struck me is how noisy the IS is on this lens when it first kicks in. It sounds like someone dropping a dime into a tin bucket! I have heard that the IS on the 300/4 L is noisier than most, but does this sound about right? (No pun intended :)).

yep. very unhealthy sound but that's normal :D.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Sep 24, 2009 02:32 |  #7

Neilyb wrote in post #8699870 (external link)
I found the copy of the 300 I had clunked alot, and the AF was just as bad.

i've owned the lens twice. the first copy was excellent but the second one had inconsistent focus.

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Neilyb
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,200 posts
Gallery: 23 photos
Likes: 546
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Munich
     
Sep 24, 2009 02:38 |  #8

ed rader wrote in post #8699999 (external link)
i've owned the lens twice. the first copy was excellent but the second one had inconsistent focus.

ed rader

Did not own it long, IQ could not compete with 100-400, :|


http://natureimmortal.​blogspot.com (external link)

http://www.natureimmor​tal.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saint728
Goldmember
Avatar
2,892 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
     
Sep 24, 2009 02:57 |  #9

Neilyb wrote in post #8700011 (external link)
Did not own it long, IQ could not compete with 100-400, :|

According to this http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=5​&APIComp=1 (external link) the 300mm f/4.0 has way better IQ then the 100-400mm at 300mm and f/5.6.

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick


Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
Click Here To See My Gear
Click here to see my Flickr (external link)
http://www.runryder.co​m/helicopter/gallery/9​019/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
actprivate
Senior Member
Avatar
499 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Australia
     
Sep 24, 2009 04:42 |  #10

Saint728 wrote in post #8700034 (external link)
According to this http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=5​&APIComp=1 (external link) the 300mm f/4.0 has way better IQ then the 100-400mm at 300mm and f/5.6.

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick

Mine seems to agree with Patrick's statement. However, I was quite concerned by the IS noise after the first use. I relaxed only after I searched POTN and found out from members that it was normal.


_______________
Canon Electro-Optical System

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,385 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Sep 24, 2009 07:36 |  #11

My new 70-200 f/4 L IS is noisier than the other IS lenses I have, other than the 70-300 IS, which has a similar shape.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nightcat
Goldmember
4,533 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Aug 2008
     
Sep 24, 2009 08:36 |  #12

Neilyb wrote in post #8700011 (external link)
Did not own it long, IQ could not compete with 100-400, :|

Wow! You must have had a bad copy!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,326 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
300mm f/4 L IS much noisier than IS on 100-400L?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1058 guests, 162 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.