G11 or S90

Jannie wrote in post #10229589
I've been supprised how adapted I'm getting to using the folding screen, it's really handy.

I have found another great use for the folding screen:
If you want to take pictures of children, just turn the screen towards them and use the viewfinder yourself, the kids will start doing all kinds of funny things as they can see themself on the screen.

St.dunstan wrote in post #10189638
I have the G11, and I am quite happy with it. I have a A630, it has served me well, and I like how Canon has made a progression through its camera series with menus and control layout.

My GF has been looking at the S90, she wants a smaller camera, and has been complaining about the low light capability of her current P+S. I told her about Richard's grip, I like the grip area on the G11, it really makes it feel secure.

Well, my GF ordered the S90, so I will get to use both.

I just picked up a G11 from Best Buy to compare it to the S90. I plan on either returning the G11 or selling the S90 depending on which I prefer. I can already see this will be tough. Physically it is really a draw for me. The G11 has better controls, stronger build, better feel, and more reach. I already have a 270EX so the hotshoe is a plus. The viewfinder sucks but not nearly as much as no viewfinder. The S90 is truly pocketable and has a little faster lens on the wide end. However, my gut feeling is the G11 is more of a "leave my DSLR at home" camera while the S90 is the one I can see always carrying.

ZCphoto--I have the G11 because of the screen. That's what I like. But I carry it more like a small dslr. I've gone back to using a Domke strap with mine. Then I use the fold out screen as a waist level finder when that's good for me.

That's the good news. But the bad news? I don't find that convenient. So my every-day-carry is a Panasonic ZS3. Bought it when I had an offer I couldn't refuse. Best feature? The lens. The S90 would have been a delight, except--the lens is shorter. I know it's brighter/faster...

Every camera is a compromise.

The good news is that we have choices.

I bought my daughter an S90 as a step-up from her hand-me-down A510. Sneaky me. She's one of those frustrating people with an observant eye for a quirky off-beat pic, and an instinctive flair for composition - but generally no interest in furthering her knowledge base.

It's been a major triumph to get her off Green Box and into P mode and basic exposure compensation. So lack of hot shoe and optical VF is not an issue. Waste of money? I don't think so. She is stunned by the quality and ease of use in low light (she's a party girl . . .). She carries it everywhere. And uses it. I still have hopes . . .

Stacked up against my G10? When replacement time comes, the VF issue is irrelevant, since I've found the G10 VF is pretty useless. But the lack of hot shoe would be a deal-breaker.

Otherwise, what a cracking wee camera!

After a lot of research, "hands-on" at BestBuy, and reading endless reviews I bought the G11. Here is what appeals to me:

1. Swivel LCD screen
2. View finder
3. Option to use an external flash
4. The solid feel
5. The actual size and ergonomics; it fits perfect for me

I am sure there isn't much difference in picture quality for the average person since most everybody uses the automatic modes. I really just comes down to personnel preference and how much you are willing to spent. I would make the same choice again.

I just went from a G10 to a S90, instead of the G11. Mostly for pocketability.. However, I just realized how weak the min focus distance is on the S. I loved doing macro stuff with my G. The S just doesnt get close enough and is too soft opened up. I've already started thinking about getting a G11 or 10.. or the next G to compliment my S.