Hasselblad has an introduced a new innovation (their "true focus" system) that just goes to show that there is plenty of room for improvement for future AF systems. It's an interesting read:
http://www.dpreview.com …09/09092802hasselblad.asp![]()
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 28, 2009 22:48 | #1 Hasselblad has an introduced a new innovation (their "true focus" system) that just goes to show that there is plenty of room for improvement for future AF systems. It's an interesting read: Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chestercopperpot Senior Member 996 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2006 More info | Sep 29, 2009 06:13 | #2 Wow - that is awesome! (if it works.) Michael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
imahawki Goldmember 1,455 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Omaha, NE More info | Sep 29, 2009 06:34 | #3 That would be useful! Olympus OMD E-M10 | Olympus 25 f/1.8 | Olympus 45 f/1.8 | Olympus 75 f/1.8 | Olympus 9-18 f/4-5.6 | Olympus 14-42 f/3.5-5.6 | Olympus 40-150 f/4-5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
texaskev Goldmember More info | Sep 29, 2009 15:56 | #4 Very cool. Man that's a lot of money! Canon 1DX II, 1DX, 11-24 F4 L, 100 F2.8 L, 16-35 F2.8 L II, 17-40 F4 L, 24-70 F2.8 L II, 24-105 F4 L II, 70-200 F2.8 L II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
livinglight Member 35 posts Joined May 2008 More info | Sep 29, 2009 20:56 | #5 Looks pretty simple, but that's it - simple ideas that are actually implemented and work are great ideas. Josh Marshall
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HYBEagle Senior Member 301 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Oct 02, 2009 14:47 | #6 No way the hardware that precise would cost only $10. The yaw detector and the chip sets along would probably cost thousands of dollars to manufature. 20D | 17-40 f/4 | 50 f/1.4 | 100 f/2.8 IS | 200 f/2.8 | 400 f/5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RiaGurl Goldmember 1,857 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: somewhere south of the arctic circle More info | Oct 03, 2009 01:47 | #7 60MP. you'd need several 32giggers. and terabytes on the comp to boot. VictoRia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 03, 2009 01:50 | #8 RiaGurl wrote in post #8751656 60MP. you'd need several 32giggers. and terabytes on the comp to boot. yup, but if you can afford one of these a few hundred for hard drives and memory cards is hardly a dent in the budget Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
frankchn Senior Member 460 posts Likes: 160 Joined Jun 2009 More info | Oct 03, 2009 10:06 | #9 No way the hardware that precise would cost only $10. The yaw detector and the chip sets along would probably cost thousands of dollars to manufature. Doubt it - I think you just need an accelerometer to measure the change the camera angle as you adjust your composition by tilting the camera - and solid state accelerometers are now so common that they are found in iPod touches. Unless you work in an environment with an ever-changing direction of the acceleration due to gravity etc (in which case I think you can turn it off) - it should work pretty reliably.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fs454 Member 159 posts Joined Mar 2007 More info | Oct 06, 2009 21:46 | #10 Just curious, who uses these cameras? Considering they cost around $45,000? Gear: 5D Mark II, Carl Zeiss ZE 50mm 1.4, Sigma 20mm f/1.4, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 50mm f/1.8 Mk1, Canon 100mm f/2.8 Macro, Rokinon 35mm f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TheHoff Don't Hassle.... 8,804 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Vancouver, BC More info | Oct 06, 2009 22:09 | #11 fs454 wrote in post #8774798 Just curious, who uses these cameras? Considering they cost around $45,000? A friend of mine is VP of marketing for a retail clothing store. The photographer he uses rents the Hasselblads with Phase One backs for their catalog and store display shoots. Not too many individual photographers would find it financially prudent to spend so much of their own money into quickly depreciating technology. ••Vancouver Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RiaGurl Goldmember 1,857 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: somewhere south of the arctic circle More info | i have seen pro's that make $30,000 for 1 product shoot, for a big agency. those that i saw, were renting the camera for the weekend/week, fyi. not sure how much renting it costs, but probably $1000-2,000 is my guess which is a lot les than owning it. VictoRia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
328somewhere Senior Member 644 posts Likes: 74 Joined Sep 2009 More info | Nov 01, 2009 00:04 | #13 Wow thats crazy. 30k for one shot. I need one of these.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RiaGurl Goldmember 1,857 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: somewhere south of the arctic circle More info | Nov 01, 2009 15:01 | #14 well the guy took a lot of shots (it was for a motorola phone), but yes 1 shoot, 30 large. must be nice. he rented the H3D, and actually had help from an assistant to show him how to use it! LOL VictoRia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 01, 2009 17:03 | #15 I think it would implement an iPhone-like accelerometer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 1400 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||