The "stuff" on the image is rain.
PeterCamyre Goldmember  1,212 posts Gallery: 83 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1626 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Wilbraham, Massachusetts. U.S.A. More info |
Rekd Member 199 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2009 Location: teh Debug Window More info | Oct 29, 2009 18:10 | #1157 GyRob wrote in post #8920147  This is one i took today its one of those planes that are very very high up . Rob. Don't planes have to be like 50 or 60 thousand feet up to leave a vapor trail? (I'm not talking about an F22 "squeezing" the vapor out either What's in your
LOG IN TO REPLY |
krb Cream of the Crop  8,818 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jun 2008 Location: Where southern efficiency and northern charm come together More info | Oct 29, 2009 18:15 | #1158 Rekd wrote in post #8920411 Don't planes have to be like 50 or 60 thousand feet up to leave a vapor trail? (I'm not talking about an F22 "squeezing" the vapor out either  )And isn't a mile a bit over 5,000 feet? Nice! Depends on temp and humidity, not altitude -- Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canonloader Cream of the Crop  More info | Oct 29, 2009 18:16 | #1159 Rekd wrote in post #8920411 Don't planes have to be like 50 or 60 thousand feet up to leave a vapor trail? (I'm not talking about an F22 "squeezing" the vapor out either )And isn't a mile a bit over 5,000 feet? Nice! B-17's left vapor trails and they could no way fly that high. As a kid, I use to see AA Constellations flying over and they would occasionally leave vapor trails. I think it's a function of the humidity in the air and air pressure. Mitch- ____...^.^...____
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GaryMcDuffie Goldmember  3,022 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsbluff, NE USA More info | Oct 29, 2009 18:19 | #1160 edgar-Junior wrote in post #8917250 Canon 7D + Canon 70-200mm 2.8 IS L + 1.4X Teleconverter
Oh my. Absolutely stunning DOF! Gary
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jonandjen67 Hatchling 6 posts Joined Jan 2009 More info | Oct 29, 2009 18:47 | #1161 Aust2000 wrote in post #8906504 Got my new 7D today and went to a local 20-20 cricket match to try out some of the new features. So far I am very happy with it. Superb Cricket shot (unlike the batsman.!!) Aust2000. Well done. Canon 5D MKII, Canon EF 24-105 f4 L IS, Canon 70-200 f4 L IS, Canon Speedlite 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlamoPhotography Member  44 posts Joined Nov 2008 More info | 7D Photo:  7D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rekd Member 199 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2009 Location: teh Debug Window More info | Oct 29, 2009 20:40 | #1163 I sit corrected. (Still a nice shot) What's in your
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5Dmaniac Goldmember  1,303 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Oct 29, 2009 20:54 | #1164 Say Hello to "Jockel" our Sun Conure. ISO 12,800 at f/2, noise treated with Kodak Digital GEM Pro at Default settings.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
binlerne Senior Member  870 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Oct 29, 2009 21:45 | #1165 |
RiaGurl Goldmember 1,857 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: somewhere south of the arctic circle More info | Oct 29, 2009 22:29 | #1166 sit...LOL. don't know what this is in response to, but i'm gonna use that expression. VictoRia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RiaGurl Goldmember 1,857 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: somewhere south of the arctic circle More info | Oct 29, 2009 22:30 | #1167 5Dmaniac wrote in post #8921276 Say Hello to "Jockel" our Sun Conure. ISO 12,800 at f/2, noise treated with Kodak Digital GEM Pro at Default settings. cute keet. VictoRia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5Dmaniac Goldmember 1,303 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:04 | #1168 Hi RiaGurl, I also use NoiseNinja. I actually installed Kodak Digital GEM mostly for my film scans - it does a wonderful job reducing grain - way better than your typical noiseware program. For high ISO digital images I prefer the Kodak plug-in because it smears less than NoiseNinja would. It is VERY easy to use- no magic to it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RiaGurl Goldmember 1,857 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: somewhere south of the arctic circle More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:07 | #1169 thanks. maybe i'll install the trial. i just hate install crapware on my computer if i don't have to. VictoRia
LOG IN TO REPLY |
5Dmaniac Goldmember 1,303 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2008 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Oct 29, 2009 23:10 | #1170 For all my film scans I use Kodak and anything digital above ISO1600 I try Kodak first - in other words, when I see significant noise, I give Kodak a try first.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1226 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
