Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 01 Oct 2009 (Thursday) 18:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which bubble level to believe?

 
rijndael
Member
193 posts
Joined Nov 2009
     
Dec 03, 2009 17:46 |  #31

This reminds me of that old adage:

The man with one level knows what level is, the man with two levels is confused.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,378 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Dec 03, 2009 19:20 |  #32

rijndael wrote in post #9130157 (external link)
This reminds me of that old adage:

The man with one level knows what level is, the man with two levels is confused.

That's why you always have at least three.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Ghost ­ of ­ FM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,982 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
     
Dec 15, 2009 01:28 |  #33

The Ghost of FM wrote in post #9125075 (external link)
The hot shoe mount on my 1DsMkII appears to be pretty much bang on level in both axis lines, which I checked my tripod first with a 6 vial carpenter's level and then on the hot shoe.

I've ordered a Jobu 3 axis hot shoe bubble level which doesn't need to be reoriented when in the portrait mode and am looking forward to getting straighter shots and especially so when I wish to just hold the camera lower to the ground and use the level as my guide...because sometime my aging body doesn't like bending that low or laying in the dirt. ;)

Ordinarily, I can get a shot within half a degree of plumb with my eye but working at odd shooting heights, it should prove to be a valuable tool. Keep in mind too, the electronic display in the 7D can't be used if you can't see the screen.

I'll test it out and post a shot once it arrives in the next day or two.

Cheers!

Sorry it took so long for it to arrive but it finally did and I commenced to test it out, doing some low level, (knee-cap height), shooting, just holding the camera down low from a standing position and was quite happy with how level and true the shot came out!


IMAGE: http://i66.photobucket.com/albums/h250/thefontmeister/VV4G7852.jpg



This seems like it's very nicely going to do the trick for me on tripod and handheld at impossibly awkward shooting positions such as backing into small/tight corners or shooting at low levels!

Cheers!

GEAR LIST l WEBSITE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bomboman
Member
Avatar
116 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: BKK, Thailand
     
Dec 15, 2009 17:39 |  #34

I think you can try both and see the comparison on your computer. Photoshop has the function that you can see which one is slanted base on 2 methods you have.


EOS 400D, 18-55 kit, Tamron 17-50 F2.8, 50 1.8 II, Canon EFS 55-250 IS
Have a nice day. ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Ghost ­ of ­ FM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,982 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2006
Location: Toronto
     
Dec 15, 2009 17:57 |  #35

bomboman wrote in post #9204677 (external link)
I think you can try both and see the comparison on your computer. Photoshop has the function that you can see which one is slanted base on 2 methods you have.

Both what?

I don't follow what your saying?

Cheers!


GEAR LIST l WEBSITE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lsquare
Goldmember
1,933 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
     
May 17, 2010 02:28 |  #36

I just happened to do a search on POTN and then this thread just appear. Is it confirmed that hot-shoe bubbles are not accurate at all? I'm thinking of ordering a 3-axis hot-shoe bubble level, but I might not if it's not even remotely accurate. If it's off by a bit, then I guess it's not a big deal, but if it's significant amount, then I mind as well just use my instinct.

How many of you are now no longer using bubble levels in light of the findings in this thread?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bohdank
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,060 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada
     
May 17, 2010 07:17 |  #37

I've never used one but have always had one on my shopping list.

Unless I am shooting buildings with WA's and tilting the camera, I have found my results have been very good...so a bubble level will probably continue to stay on my shopping list for some time to come.


Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
Gear List

Montreal Concert, Event and Portrait Photographer (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,378 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
May 17, 2010 07:30 |  #38

lsquare wrote in post #10194145 (external link)
I just happened to do a search on POTN and then this thread just appear. Is it confirmed that hot-shoe bubbles are not accurate at all? I'm thinking of ordering a 3-axis hot-shoe bubble level, but I might not if it's not even remotely accurate. If it's off by a bit, then I guess it's not a big deal, but if it's significant amount, then I mind as well just use my instinct.

How many of you are now no longer using bubble levels in light of the findings in this thread?

No, it's not confirmed. It depends on whether the hotshoe on your particular camera sample happens to be mounted level and plumb with the sensor.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bunyarra
Senior Member
429 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 32
Joined Feb 2006
     
May 17, 2010 08:08 |  #39

lsquare wrote in post #10194145 (external link)
I just happened to do a search on POTN and then this thread just appear. Is it confirmed that hot-shoe bubbles are not accurate at all? I'm thinking of ordering a 3-axis hot-shoe bubble level, but I might not if it's not even remotely accurate. If it's off by a bit, then I guess it's not a big deal, but if it's significant amount, then I mind as well just use my instinct.

How many of you are now no longer using bubble levels in light of the findings in this thread?

It depends on

a) your hotshoe mount (my 5DII is ok, 5D out)
b) how well the bubble level fits in the hotshoe; is it loose or tight
c) accuracy of the bubble level itself

For me, c) has always been the issue. 5 bubble levels on my desk and all are different. Two are the triple axis ones and I'd not trust any of those. One because it's base plate is completely wonky and the other has badly aligned tubes inside the perspex.

I do not know if the £20 versions are better than the ebay £5 ones. Personally, I now use a digital level at all times. I know that is accurate.

Mike.


-------------
Michael Gove
http://photosignals.sm​ugmug.com (external link)
Google+ Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lsquare
Goldmember
1,933 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
     
May 17, 2010 17:15 |  #40

bunyarra wrote in post #10194908 (external link)
It depends on

a) your hotshoe mount (my 5DII is ok, 5D out)
b) how well the bubble level fits in the hotshoe; is it loose or tight
c) accuracy of the bubble level itself

For me, c) has always been the issue. 5 bubble levels on my desk and all are different. Two are the triple axis ones and I'd not trust any of those. One because it's base plate is completely wonky and the other has badly aligned tubes inside the perspex.

I do not know if the £20 versions are better than the ebay £5 ones. Personally, I now use a digital level at all times. I know that is accurate.

Mike.

Which one are you using?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
May 18, 2010 13:43 |  #41

Digital does not automatically mean more accurate.

I worked for a large electrical contracting business that went to ISO9000 (actually its BS equivilant who's number I've long since forgotten). At vast expensive I was forced to buy digital meters and provide suitable test facilities. The expensive meters were useless, never steady, hunting the whole time. Analogue kit has its place - "1Meg resistance between poles, thats fine, whats next"? Instead my electricians spend 15 minutes each and every time deciding which of the hundreds of figures they should choose to write down on the test certificate!

Computers even use it these days, its called fuzzy logic. "A 95% certainty right now is better than 99.9% in 10 years time".


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bunyarra
Senior Member
429 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 32
Joined Feb 2006
     
May 20, 2010 14:33 |  #42

lsquare wrote in post #10198086 (external link)
Which one are you using?

These guys - their pocket spirit level thing.

http://digipas.co.uk/ (external link)

As for accuracy - I can tell doubters that these are definitely better than guessing the exact position of a bubble in these cheap e-bay hot shoe units.

I use it on the tripod's quick-release clamp ; on both the 5D and 5dII, this proves better than the hot shoe.


-------------
Michael Gove
http://photosignals.sm​ugmug.com (external link)
Google+ Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,823 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Which bubble level to believe?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2716 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.