Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 02 Oct 2009 (Friday) 05:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Rodenstock Heligon 1,5/100mm question

 
haiko
Senior Member
Avatar
256 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Switzerland
     
Oct 02, 2009 05:33 |  #1

does anyone know wheather this is a fixed-focus / fixed-aperture lens ?

http://cgi.ebay.ch …1b25&_trksid=p3​286.c0.m14 (external link)

thanks in advance for your help, regards...


:idea:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayatphonix
Member
211 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: NC
     
Oct 02, 2009 07:47 |  #2

Yes, this is a fixed focus lens. Focus is achieved by moving the camera or by adding bellows/helicoid. As best I can tell, none of the Rodenstock-Heligon lenses have an aperature. Consequently, all must be used wide open. Exposure is controlled by shutterspeed.

It looks like an interesting lens. I investigated Rodenstock lenses a couple of months ago. They are mostly very fast, but will take some modification to work with EOS cameras. This individual has already made the modifications.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 02, 2009 09:22 |  #3

Yes,fixed focus and probably at about 1.5' if you mount it on your Canon. I have a Rodenstock Heligon 80/2.8 which has aperture blades in it. Mounted it on a Kilfit Zoomar focusing helicoil and now I can use it on my Canons. Wonderful lens.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayatphonix
Member
211 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: NC
     
Oct 02, 2009 11:12 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #4

Gene, as always you're a great source of information. I can't figure out the base of the Rodenstocks. Are they m39? That's the problem I ran into a couple of months back as I found a couple at reasonable prices and in good shape but couldn't figure out how to mount...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 02, 2009 11:19 |  #5

Yes, many Rodenstocks are m39, easy to get an adpter and make it m42. Measure it with a ruler - or ask the seller to.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayatphonix
Member
211 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: NC
     
Oct 02, 2009 11:29 |  #6

I've actually got an extra m39 to m42 adapter in the drawer... This is probably something I didn't need to know...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 02, 2009 12:04 |  #7

Do you have a Jupiter 9 (85/2) in chrome, M39 mount? I like it so much I have an extra copy.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayatphonix
Member
211 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: NC
     
Oct 02, 2009 14:03 |  #8

You and I talked about the Jupiter a while back. I have a silver Helios... I've also got a Nikkor 85/1.8 "H", Tak 85/1.8, Pentax 85/2.2, Viv Series 1 90/2.5, and EF 85/1.8. Please don't talk me into another!

I find I reach for the Tak in most cases. Helios if I'm after the weird bokeh, Pentax for its soft focus look. I really haven't shot the Nikkor much, but I understand it's wonderful.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gasrocks
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,432 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Portage, Wisconsin USA
     
Oct 02, 2009 15:28 |  #9

I'm not a Pentax fan. Don't like the bokeh in general. Just sold my Helios 40-2.


GEAR LIST
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rayatphonix
Member
211 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Location: NC
     
Oct 02, 2009 17:41 as a reply to  @ gasrocks's post |  #10

Why do you prefer the Jupiter to the Helios? Size and weight are obvious advantages, resistance to flare (at least compared to my version) is another. What other benefits do you see with the Jupiter?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,541 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Rodenstock Heligon 1,5/100mm question
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1677 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.