Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 03 Oct 2009 (Saturday) 17:20
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "How do you normally White Balance outdoors (Raw or Jpg)"
Auto WB
40
36.4%
Camera Presets
7
6.4%
Custom
15
13.6%
Meh, I shoot Raw so I don't worry about it until I get home
48
43.6%

110 voters, 110 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How Do You White Balance (outdoors)?

 
drisley
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Oct 03, 2009 17:20 |  #1

For years, I've shot Raw, and not worried about White Balance because I figured "I can just do it later in Adobe Camera Raw".

However, lately I've been trying to streamline my workflow, switching back to good old Canon Zoombrowser/Raw Image Task to get images/colours as Canon intended straight out of camera, but with the benefit of having a Raw original.

One thing I've realized is that getting White Balance correct at the time of shooting really improves workflow when I'm working on 1000 pictures from an event, like a marathon.

My question is mainly aimed at shooting outdoors, because I find that AUTO WB is decent, but often a bit on the cool side, especially if the clouds come out. When it's cloudy, I find that CLOUDY WB seems to make things a bit too "amber?" for lack of a better word. Daylight isn't bad, a bit of a compromise of both, but again, can sometimes be too cool.

Anyway, how do most of you work your outdoor white balance, especially when working on an event with a large number of pics? Any tips would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 03, 2009 17:30 |  #2

I also find cloudy and shade WB to be too warm. In general I've found auto WB to work well in daylight - cool in the shade, of course, but that's what it really looks like to my eye.

I find with auto WB on raw images the "as shot" WB in DPP is good for most of my shots.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Oct 03, 2009 18:11 |  #3

Thanks Number Six.

One thing I notice when I look at a lot of pictures taken outdoors, especially by new photographers, is that their images don't have "pop" and often it's due to a white balance that is too cool.

However, like you, I find a bit warm, but I like that sometimes, but I haven't found an instance where Shade ever looks good.

Recently I was talking to a very successful and talented fitness photographer, he does all his shooting outdoors, natural light, with a silver reflector if necessary. The first thing he does is sets his 5D WB to CLOUDY. The results look amazing, but he uses Bibble (CLOUDY from Bibble, especially B5 looks quite good), and he must do some sort of extra processing.

That's when I realized that apart from not liking the ACR colours, I didn't like it's presets for WB, and that out of camera, the WB was often too cool outdoors.


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 03, 2009 18:21 |  #4

The only two problems I've had shooting outdoors in the daylight using Auto WB have been first in the late afternoon just before sunset -- it comes out quite warm and sometimes has wanted a touch of cooling -- and in heavily shaded areas, especialy if I'm trying to balance the scene with some sunlit areas. Both of those scenes could be challenging even with a Custom WB, depending on what you're after -- you may want the late afternoon scene to be warm, after all. Generally, though, I stay at Auto in the day time or at night or indoors if there is a real mix of lighting, or often if I'm using a speedlight flash, since they have a color temp close to daylight.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Oct 03, 2009 19:01 |  #5

Thanks tonylong. I have a similar experience, however my results tend to be on the cool side of things.

I haven't done much shooting at sunset (I need to start though), but here is an example taken in May at about 7am, just as the sun was rising, on a partly cloudy morning. These people were in the shade, and here are my results (out of Raw Image Task, don't get me started on ACR WB Presets, ugh).

To me, Auto is too cool, Daylight is getting better, Cloudy is maybe a bit warm, and Shade is way off. I think I like Daylight best, but Cloudy is close too. I think somewhere in between would be ideal.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mathogre
Goldmember
Avatar
3,839 posts
Gallery: 122 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1394
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Oakton, VA USA
     
Oct 03, 2009 20:57 as a reply to  @ drisley's post |  #6

I go auto, whether RAW or jpeg. Mostly it works just fine. Indoors I'll usually shoot RAW and use auto also, and correct the WB afterwards. Often the indoor lighting is sufficiently odd as to require manual adjustment in PP.


Graham
My Photo Collection (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Oct 04, 2009 06:28 |  #7

AWB, then adjust while post processing. I don't fret too much even there. If it looks right then I'm happy.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Oct 04, 2009 09:57 |  #8

One of the last three choices, depending on what I anticipate I'll need.
Remember, the "correct" WB isn't always the "right" WB for that image? Don't be afraid of fudging it a bit if you think the shot looks better. ;)


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Oct 04, 2009 18:00 |  #9

Thanks guys!

PhotosGuy wrote in post #8757907 (external link)
One of the last three choices, depending on what I anticipate I'll need.
Remember, the "correct" WB isn't always the "right" WB for that image? Don't be afraid of fudging it a bit if you think the shot looks better. ;)

This sounds correct. I like the "Daylight" balance above the best, but I asked another photographer who immediately liked the "Shade" balance the best, which to me looked way too warm. I guess technically the "Shade" is too warm, but it helps relate a nice warm sunrise and could be applicable in some situations.


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DarenM
Senior Member
675 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Theresa, NY
     
Oct 04, 2009 19:18 |  #10

I set it to 5500K for out doors, seems to be a good general setting then adjust as needed in post processing, when you use the 5500k rather than AWB, you pick up the true lighting in the majetic first and last two hours instead of camera trying to correct in AWB. Note: not my idea, read it from another poster and it seems to work well.


Canon 1D MK IV, Canon 1D MK III, Canon 5D, 24-70 2.8L, 70-200 2.8 L IS MK II, 17-40 F4 Canon, 430 EX, Canon A2E, 530EX Canon 1.4 Extender, 580 II, 600EX-RT, ST-E3-RT, (Way too much stuff for an amateur)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Oct 04, 2009 19:43 |  #11

Thanks DarenM, I may try that tomorrow.

Btw, is there any way to find out what K temp Canon uses for Daylight, Cloudy and Shade? RIT won't show this. I think there may be some tint adjustments too.


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 04, 2009 20:45 |  #12

drisley wrote in post #8760439 (external link)
Thanks DarenM, I may try that tomorrow.

Btw, is there any way to find out what K temp Canon uses for Daylight, Cloudy and Shade? RIT won't show this. I think there may be some tint adjustments too.

You can figure it out for yourself - shoot a gray card in each of those modes in raw, then in DPP adjust the color temp to get a match.

That's how I determined the K temp of my hardware store quartz-halogen floods.

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
darosk
Goldmember
Avatar
2,806 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
     
Oct 04, 2009 21:11 as a reply to  @ number six's post |  #13

I voted,

Meh, I shoot Raw so I don't worry about it until I get home


Tumblr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Youtube (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drisley
THREAD ­ STARTER
"What a Tool I am"
Avatar
9,002 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Nov 2002
     
Oct 04, 2009 22:04 |  #14

Thanks guys. I do have a whi-bal, so I may give it a shot.

However, I've been playing around in RIT, and discoverd some settings that seem to work really well in almost all outdoor/natural light conditions. I'm thrilled with the result. I'm going to plug it in to my camera tomorrow and probably save as a preset for outdoor work. For indoor work, I'm loving the picture style PF2 that Pixmantra included with his 1D3 FlexNR action, and that will be my indoor go to setup.

For outdoors, this is what I'm liking.

WB: Auto
Tint: A2 (adds a bit of warmth)
Picture Style: Faithful
Contrast: 0 (Default)
Saturation: +2
Tone: +2

This seems to work extremely well in cloudy and clear weather, and the skin tones are so nice. No more blown reds either which is typical for Canon in Standard settings. I actually found some of these settings in a thread about 40D ooc settings, and it really helps me daylight stuff.

Soooo, if all goes well, I SHOULD be able to output the few hundred pics I plan on taking Monday and have them ready by Tuesday or Wednesday. Although, it looks like cloudy/rainy conditions :(


EOS R6 Mark II - Sigma 50/1.4 Art - Sigma 14-24/2.8 Art - Canon EF 70-200/2.8L Mark III - Godox Xpro-C - Godox TT685C x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 04, 2009 23:27 |  #15

drisley wrote in post #8761275 (external link)
Thanks guys. I do have a whi-bal, so I may give it a shot.

However, I've been playing around in RIT, and discoverd some settings that seem to work really well in almost all outdoor/natural light conditions. I'm thrilled with the result.

(snip)

This seems to work extremely well in cloudy and clear weather, and the skin tones are so nice. No more blown reds either which is typical for Canon in Standard settings.
(snip)

Soooo, if all goes well, I SHOULD be able to output the few hundred pics I plan on taking Monday and have them ready by Tuesday or Wednesday. Although, it looks like cloudy/rainy conditions :(

Awright! You've got results that look good.

Well done!

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,976 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
How Do You White Balance (outdoors)?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1459 guests, 136 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.