Using MULTIPLE strobes - creative examples - post yours!

O3DigitalBath wrote in post #12232056
more on my flickr

So clean!

Thanks Zach

spesmeadeus wrote in post #12232139
This image was taken with three lights. I did a bunch of work to get it to come out right your thoughts? i shot this at f8 is the fake depth of field obvious?

one would have to look for it as i see it. It looks splendid

O3DigitalBath wrote in post #12232332
Thanks Zach

BEautifully done, I agree, really clean! Nice work. (brilliant car as well)

mikewinburn wrote in post #12232859
one would have to look for it as i see it. It looks splendid

I agree. For anyone that's not a photographer and regularly uses Ps, I would say you wouldn't know or notice. Lovely tones to it too.

heres one from yesterday, I'll be making a separate thread for these but heres a teaser, one of the favorites, click for strobist

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Shot a new family last week, one flash inside on them, one outside on the porch

Higher res. on flickr:
http://www.flickr.com …/in/photostream​/lightbox/

paradiddleluke wrote in post #12233957
heres one from yesterday, I'll be making a separate thread for these but heres a teaser, one of the favorites, click for strobist

http://farm6.static.fl​ickr.com/5021/56238487​84_2104f93fcd_b.jpg
Brittany Jo by LukeCS, on Flickr

Awesome shot Lucas! Great lighting, composition and pose! Location looks cool too

O3DigitalBath wrote in post #12234146
Shot a new family last week, one flash inside on them, one outside on the porch

PS...I know I chopped fingers/feet

I've got other frames where I didn't but I like this one and I havn't heard from them which final photos they want.

Beautifully lit, and a really nice portrait! The fingers I know you saw, but for me the blown-out upper right hand corner is a little distracting. Other than that small nit, it's brilliant!

mikewinburn wrote in post #12232859
one would have to look for it as i see it. It looks splendid

agree looks great and creates nice focal point on face. Has Jill Greenberg style with crying baby. Is that your baby?

WL XL3220 + HOBD + sock @1/2 - B800 + brolly box @ 1/8, both camera right.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tycn/5625930317​/

pnmd wrote in post #12234879
agree looks great and creates nice focal point on face. Has Jill Greenberg style with crying baby. Is that your baby?

no it was a series of babies that we shot that are part of my wife's baby group. Thanks though I thought that it helped focus on the face too.

Here is a different one with a different take on the processing, i tried the same focal point enhancement to this one, I actually like the way it looks, even though I can pick it out as fake I still find that it helps focus the eye on the face.

IMAGE LINK: http://farm6.static.fl​ickr.com …26563020_e03cd3​7116_z.jpg

spesmeadeus wrote in post #12237133
no it was a series of babies that we shot that are part of my wife's baby group. Thanks though I thought that it helped focus on the face too.

Here is a different one with a different take on the processing, i tried the same focal point enhancement to this one, I actually like the way it looks, even though I can pick it out as fake I still find that it helps focus the eye on the face.

IMAGE LINK: http://farm6.static.fl​ickr.com …26563020_e03cd3​7116_z.jpg

I think it looks a bit weird that the foot is in focus but the bottom of the teddy bear is out of focus. Other than that I love the PP you're doing with these.

Here are some pics from yesterdays shoot. Trying some new PP myself. Rest of the set in my flickr.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/43059989@N02/5​626095703/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/43059989@N02/5​626089359/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/43059989@N02/5​626676176/

DigiNon wrote in post #12237455
I think it looks a bit weird that the foot is in focus but the bottom of the teddy bear is out of focus. Other than that I love the PP you're doing with these.

Here are some pics from yesterdays shoot. Trying some new PP myself. Rest of the set in my flickr.

Ya i was wondering about that myself,

i really like the last one however the first is way to processed for me, it doesn't look natural, it looks a bit too painted on. The last one looks clean and crisp, much more realistic.

I changed this pic so that the foot wasn't in focus and on second look i do like it better. I was trying to imagine the plane on which would be in focus and thought that the foot may be in that but you are right it doesn't look natural. Here is the fixed image as well as one other one from the same set.