Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
Thread started 04 Oct 2009 (Sunday) 23:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Friday night HS football

 
northpointphoto
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
     
Oct 04, 2009 23:09 |  #1

Shot some football on Friday night trying out the flash under the camera setup. Let me know what you think.

1

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


2
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


3
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


4
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


5 Interception with a 40 yard run back.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Russell
Russell Tracy Photography (external link) |LIGHTING SETUPS AND DIAGRAMS
Think Tank Photo Affiliate (external link) | Sports Shooter Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Zivnuska
Goldmember
Avatar
3,686 posts
Gallery: 72 photos
Likes: 654
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wichita, Kansas
     
Oct 04, 2009 23:20 |  #2

I think you did great. Number 5 not up to the level of the others.


www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com/blog (external link) = My Blog
Gear List
www.zivnuska.zenfolio.​com (external link)

"It's not tight until you see the color of the irides."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
northpointphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
     
Oct 04, 2009 23:26 |  #3

Thanks for the comments. I know 5 isn't up to the level of the rest because I cropped in a good bit. I was just impressed with the play.


Russell
Russell Tracy Photography (external link) |LIGHTING SETUPS AND DIAGRAMS
Think Tank Photo Affiliate (external link) | Sports Shooter Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
liam5100
Senior Member
Avatar
944 posts
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Kansas
     
Oct 05, 2009 00:07 |  #4

Thats always a challenge russell, sometimes you have to balance between the best technical shot and the shot that shows a point of interest or action.


Bill -
Equipment : Quaker Oatmeal box with a little tiny hole in it... and a 400 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snyderman
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,084 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Wadsworth, Ohio
     
Oct 05, 2009 09:03 |  #5

those are good. Flashed or not, pretty sharp shots. I'm (apparently) getting WORSE with my flash shots.

I've had the flash straight on the hotshoe, mounted below on my monopod and on a flash bracket last week. Can't figure it out. Flash just SUCKS!!!

dave


Canon 5D2 > 35L-85L-135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
namasste
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,911 posts
Likes: 140
Joined Jul 2007
Location: NE Ohio
     
Oct 05, 2009 09:11 |  #6

Looks great! 3 and 4 in particular although I do have a crit about that kid's form in #3, hell, Ernest Byner protected the ball better than that!

Exposure looks solid and you got some great action. Really can't complain!


Scott Evans Photography (external link)
SportsShooterProfile (external link) l MaxPreps Profile (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
northpointphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
     
Oct 05, 2009 09:58 |  #7

Thanks for the comments.

What I did was I put the flash underneath the camera on the monopod and set the flash to 1/2 power 50mm f2.8 ISO 1600.

On the camera I set it to 1/250 ISO 1000 and then varied the aperture up and down to balance the flash. If they were far away (40+ yards) I used f2.8. If there were close I would dial up to about 4.5. It wasn't exact but worked pretty good.


Russell
Russell Tracy Photography (external link) |LIGHTING SETUPS AND DIAGRAMS
Think Tank Photo Affiliate (external link) | Sports Shooter Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wyofizz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,340 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
     
Oct 05, 2009 13:28 as a reply to  @ northpointphoto's post |  #8

Whites look blown out to me. Green uniforms look great.
Did you try a lower ISO? I don't shoot above 800.
#5 may not be above ambient enough?
Dave


Dave - Fuzzy Hashing makes me itch.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
northpointphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
     
Oct 06, 2009 11:50 |  #9

Thanks for the comments.

I did try a lower ISO but they came out too underexposed and in #5 I dont think the flash fired. I was having problems with my triggers at one point during the game.

EDIT: Looking again flash did fire Im going to blame the poor quality on the heavy crop I did.


Russell
Russell Tracy Photography (external link) |LIGHTING SETUPS AND DIAGRAMS
Think Tank Photo Affiliate (external link) | Sports Shooter Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan-o
Goldmember
Avatar
3,539 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2006
Location: So. Cal.
     
Oct 06, 2009 11:56 |  #10

If your flash settings are correct the players should be completely black if the flash didn't fire.


Danny.
DMunsonPhoto (external link)
Cycling Illustrated (external link)
FaceBook Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
northpointphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
     
Oct 06, 2009 15:51 |  #11

Dan-o wrote in post #8771555 (external link)
If your flash settings are correct the players should be completely black if the flash didn't fire.

No cause the field is bright enough to shoot at 1/250 f2.8 ISO 1000 and only be about 1 stop underexposed which can be "fixed" in post. Normally when I shoot ambient on that field I shot around 1/500, f2.8 ISO 2500.

I wanted to use the flash should I could get better exposed shots. Im not using the flash to completely overpower the ambient light, just to assist it. Thats why the shots aren't totally black if the flash doesn't fire.


Russell
Russell Tracy Photography (external link) |LIGHTING SETUPS AND DIAGRAMS
Think Tank Photo Affiliate (external link) | Sports Shooter Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clarence
Goldmember
Avatar
2,204 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Northern VA
     
Oct 06, 2009 16:05 |  #12

northpointphoto wrote in post #8772804 (external link)
No cause the field is bright enough to shoot at 1/250 f2.8 ISO 1000 and only be about 1 stop underexposed which can be "fixed" in post. Normally when I shoot ambient on that field I shot around 1/500, f2.8 ISO 2500.

I wanted to use the flash should I could get better exposed shots. Im not using the flash to completely overpower the ambient light, just to assist it. Thats why the shots aren't totally black if the flash doesn't fire.

But if your ambient is only 1 stop less than flash, and if your shutter speed is limited by xsync to 1/250", I expected more ghosting and motion blur.

I think #1 is lit nicely. And I like the dive of orange jersey #54 in picture #2. From the shadow and red-eye in #2, I'm guessing flash was mounted slightly below on your monopod.

The only ghosting I see is on the left of picture #4.

Can you share exif (SS was 1/250" on all)?

What type of flash, flash settings, and mount? From the shadow and redeye in #2, I'm guessing flash was mounted slightly below on your monopod.


For Sale: 1D, T1i, 800mm, 600mm

5D3, 1D4, 7D, 600/4L, 200/1.8L, Sigmonster 300-800mm, 80-200/2.8L MDP, 28-70/2.8L, 85/1.8, 50/1.4, 12-24mm, (4) 550EXs, (4) WL strobes, PW MiniTT1/FlexTT5s/AC3/A​C9s
LoCo-Photo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wyofizz
Goldmember
Avatar
1,340 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Wyoming
     
Oct 06, 2009 18:24 as a reply to  @ clarence's post |  #13

I'm with Clarence, if your only one 1 stop above ambient 1-4 are amazing
results.


Dave - Fuzzy Hashing makes me itch.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
northpointphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
754 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 18
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
     
Oct 06, 2009 21:43 |  #14

clarence wrote in post #8772874 (external link)
But if your ambient is only 1 stop less than flash, and if your shutter speed is limited by xsync to 1/250", I expected more ghosting and motion blur.

I think #1 is lit nicely. And I like the dive of orange jersey #54 in picture #2. From the shadow and red-eye in #2, I'm guessing flash was mounted slightly below on your monopod.

The only ghosting I see is on the left of picture #4.

Can you share exif (SS was 1/250" on all)?

What type of flash, flash settings, and mount? From the shadow and redeye in #2, I'm guessing flash was mounted slightly below on your monopod.

wyofizz wrote in post #8773694 (external link)
I'm with Clarence, if your only one 1 stop above ambient 1-4 are amazing
results.

Only about 1-1.5 stop above ambient plus some tweaking in Lightroom and Photoshop.

Nikon SB-26 w/quantum turbo battery underneath the camera about 2 feet off the ground on the monopod. I had the flash set in manual to 1/2 power 50-85mm f2.8 ISO 1600.

On the camera I set it to 1/250 ISO 1000 and then varied the aperture up and down to balance the flash. If they were far away (40+ yards) I used f2.8. If there were close I would dial up to about 4.5. It wasn't exact but worked pretty good.


Russell
Russell Tracy Photography (external link) |LIGHTING SETUPS AND DIAGRAMS
Think Tank Photo Affiliate (external link) | Sports Shooter Profile (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
clarence
Goldmember
Avatar
2,204 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2008
Location: Northern VA
     
Oct 06, 2009 23:14 |  #15

northpointphoto wrote in post #8774782 (external link)
varied the aperture up and down to balance the flash. If they were far away (40+ yards) I used f2.8. If there were close I would dial up to about 4.5. It wasn't exact but worked pretty good.

I've seen a few people use aperture to balance flash power. I've only tried flashed football a few times, but I was trying to adjust between 1/1, 1/2, 1/4 power levels. Also seems like using FEC would be more suitable, so I'm going to give that a try next time. I'll also try the "vary aperture by distance" method.

One other thing that I'm curious to experiment more with is longer shutter times... I thought 1/250" xsync was slow and constraining. And a lot of people cheat that by bumping up to 1/320 and for the minor risk of partial shutter curtains at the bottom of the frame.

But I'm actually intrigued with the pleasant results I was getting when I was slowing down my shutter, like to 1/100".... letting in more ambient background, but still letting the flash freeze and expose the foreground.


For Sale: 1D, T1i, 800mm, 600mm

5D3, 1D4, 7D, 600/4L, 200/1.8L, Sigmonster 300-800mm, 80-200/2.8L MDP, 28-70/2.8L, 85/1.8, 50/1.4, 12-24mm, (4) 550EXs, (4) WL strobes, PW MiniTT1/FlexTT5s/AC3/A​C9s
LoCo-Photo.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,094 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Friday night HS football
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Sports 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2850 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.