Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 05 Oct 2009 (Monday) 09:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do you keep your old RAW files

 
drmac
Senior Member
500 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Oct 05, 2009 09:22 |  #1

OK, so I go to an event and take several shots. When I come home I only pick the "keepers". I have always kept all the RAW files (even the unused ones)...

I am curious if others keep all their RAW files or delete them.... Keeping all the files takes up alot of space...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Oct 05, 2009 09:28 |  #2

If you didn't like the shot right after the event, what are the chances you will like it in a year?

I cull all of the ones flagged "rejects" and for non-important events I also cull the ones flagged "unmarked" only keeping those flagged as keepers. For most days though I also keep the unmarked ones since disk space is cheap. I suppose it comes down to how important the event is for you... would you ever browse the non picks? For something like my son's birth, yes, we will browse the non-picks at some point... but for Aunt Martha's 68th birthday? Probably not.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doctorgonzo
Member
Avatar
217 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Oct 05, 2009 09:52 |  #3

I delete the obvious rejects (OOF, drastic exposure problems, etc.). Everything else I keep.

Why keep a useless RAW file around? To prove I take plenty of crappy pictures? I have enough proof of that! :)


Canon 40D Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM — Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 — Canon Speedlite 430EX II A long B&H wish list!
http://www.nathanhunst​ad.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom_D
Goldmember
Avatar
1,425 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Napa ~ on the edge of retirement.
     
Oct 05, 2009 20:10 |  #4

I use DownloaderPro and archive all of the original CR2s converting to DNG for review in LightRoom. I delete the reject DNGs but the CR2s get backed up to a Drobo for ALL time.


Gallery (external link)
7DMkII, 40D, 17-55, 70-200 f/2.8 IS and more...
More Wag, Less Bark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Oct 05, 2009 20:11 |  #5

I like to think I'm pretty ruthless when it comes to culling the herd but I've still managed to amass a whole lot of 1s and 0s.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grimes
Goldmember
1,323 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2006
     
Oct 05, 2009 20:16 |  #6

I periodically go through all my stuff and delete the photos that will never see printing or the light of day. I aways have a hard time deleting right after a shoot, but one month later I can be more "ruthless" hah!


Alex
5DMKII | 85 f/1.8 | 17-40L f/4 | 24-105 f/4 IS | 40 f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dermit
Goldmember
1,815 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 174
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Chandler, Arizona
     
Oct 06, 2009 10:46 |  #7

I keep them all except for the obvious miss (focus, really bad exposure, etc.)
I have many images that do not make it as picks, but I do not delete them. And there have been times when that has worked out very well...

One time I did a family portrait shoot. I take several of the same pose. There were quite a few shots where they were obvious misses where most of the people in the shot were not looking at the camera, etc. I had one great shot that was going to be the big sell for a 16x20 print... but the dad had a funny look on his face. So I go back to the 'missed' shots and in one of them where everyone else was looking bad, the dad had a great look.... so I was able to salvage the shot using the dad from this one 'reject'.

Also, on two other occasions I have retrieved shots from the 'reject' pile to provide prints for funerals as they were the last shots taken of the person. Both of these were unremarkable shots, nothing outstanding, but suddenly became very valuable in memories to the families.

You never know... and, yes, disc space is very cheap.


5DmkII, 5DmkIII, 5DS R, 15mm, 16-35 f/2.8 II L, 100 Macro f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, 580EX II, 580EX, 550EX
http://www.pixelcraftp​hoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
Oct 06, 2009 11:42 as a reply to  @ Dermit's post |  #8

I keep mine as well. I'll back them up using DVD's


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tfd888
Goldmember
Avatar
1,816 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2009
Location: CA, USA
     
Oct 07, 2009 02:23 as a reply to  @ Dchemist's post |  #9

Yup, I burn off a DVD of each card as soon as I come back from a shoot before I start processing/editing and then keep my keeper RAW files on an external drive.


Alexander R.O.
1D-Mark III ~1D-Mark II ~ 60D ~ 20D (Gripped)
(70-200mm L 2.8 IS) ~ (17-40mm L 4.0) (Sigma 24-70mm 2.8 EX DG Macro RIP) ~ (50mm 1.8 MKII) ~ (Alpex 35mm f/2.8 M42 mount) ~ (430EX II) ~ (Yongnuo YN-560 III)
My Website (external link) - My Blog (external link)
- My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TattooedAffliction
Senior Member
Avatar
264 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Pennsylvania
     
Oct 07, 2009 02:29 as a reply to  @ tfd888's post |  #10

I haven't had that many shoots yet, so yeah I keep all mine; however, when I get busier, I'm going to have to back them up on a disk or external hard drive.


Tom
Canon 5D MK II | 7D | 40D | EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 | EF 28-135 f/3.5-5.6
70-200 f/2.8L IS II USM |[COLOR=red] [COLOR=Black]24-70 f/2.8L USM | 580EX II
Elinchrom 2 & 4 D-Lite kits

Sekonic L-358http://www.airliners.n​et …otographersearc​h=PeterEde (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neilwood32
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,231 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Sitting atop the castle, Edinburgh, Scotland
     
Oct 07, 2009 07:45 |  #11

I keep the vast majority of my shots for numerous reasons:
1) My PP skill gets better as time goes on - i may be able to rescue something in the future that i thought was useless.
2) I like to see how i have advanced as a photographer - and even the % of keepers/rubbish gives me an idea of how my eye is developing.
3) Space is cheap - it is a fairly cheap option these days to have a 500Gb hard drive as spare storage
4) You never know when you might want that one shot of Aunty xxxxx - even if it was a poor one in your opinion. It might still be the best one available.


Having a camera makes you no more a photographer than having a hammer and some nails makes you a carpenter - Claude Adams
Keep calm and carry a camera!
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheHoff
Don't Hassle....
Avatar
8,804 posts
Likes: 21
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Oct 07, 2009 07:53 |  #12

Where I'm getting killed on disk space are my stupid TIFF edits. A typical workflow for me involves exporting from LR to CS4 to run Aperture 2 for film look and grain. Every single time I do that, a 160mb TIFF is created instead of just a 15mb DNG. And I normally don't want to delete the TIFF since I'll do other adjustments in CS4 before saving back to LR again.

Oh well, disk space is cheap... I just wish I could fit more in the laptop. I'm not looking forward to making some of my catalog external.


••Vancouver Wedding Photographer  (external link)••| [gear list] | Latest blog: 5 steps to stopping image loss (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Removed_7767ncyz
Member
195 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2008
     
Oct 07, 2009 09:02 |  #13
bannedPermanently

Weddings - yes.
Personal stuff, gigs, events etc, I tend to delete as I don't plan on going back and trying to improve the processing. If I went back into my photos to redo processing every time I got a bit better at photoshop techniques, I'd be constantly looking backward rather than forward.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PHS
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Kansas City
     
Oct 07, 2009 09:12 as a reply to  @ Removed_7767ncyz's post |  #14

I keep them all. I move them off to an external hard drive eventually. Just picked up two 1.5T Freeagent drives for $99 each, so storage is not really that expensive.

And, yes...I do go back and use the non-keepers. I shoot a lot of pets, and I've had clients coming back years later wanting to see 'everything' from the shoot...sadly, this is usually because the pet has passed away and many of my bad shots are better than their good ones.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
radiotowers
Member
81 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Louisa, VA
     
Oct 07, 2009 15:10 |  #15

doctorgonzo wrote in post #8763796 (external link)
I delete the obvious rejects (OOF, drastic exposure problems, etc.). Everything else I keep.

Why keep a useless RAW file around? To prove I take plenty of crappy pictures? I have enough proof of that! :)

+1

Storage is fairly cheap, but keeping redundant backups of very large RAW files are getting to be a bit of a headache. I really need to work on a more streamlined process for this...


GearFeedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,171 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
Do you keep your old RAW files
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2816 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.