Does anyone find that the 50mm 1.2L is unacceptably slow focusing in low light?
mikeassk Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Oct 06, 2009 12:40 | #1 Does anyone find that the 50mm 1.2L is unacceptably slow focusing in low light?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | Oct 06, 2009 13:32 | #2 mikeassk wrote in post #8771786 Does anyone find that the 50mm 1.2L is unacceptably slow focusing in low light? I do not. connecticut wedding photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Subimatt Senior Member 522 posts Likes: 2 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Albany, NY More info | Oct 06, 2009 13:32 | #3 |
GMCPhotographics Goldmember More info | Oct 06, 2009 13:42 | #4 Slow? Not really. It's not a 300mm f2.8, sure but we are talking about low light performance here. If it's too dark to Manually Focus, then it's probably too dark for the AF sensor too. Regards, Gareth Cooper GMCPhotographics
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xxza Member 54 posts Joined Sep 2009 More info | Oct 06, 2009 14:00 | #5 I don't understand why 50L's reviews are always lower than 35L, 85LII and 135L?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rodinal Goldmember 1,127 posts Joined Jul 2008 More info | Oct 06, 2009 14:02 | #6 Permanent banI find the 50/1.2 to be unacceptably everything 1D Mark II • 16-35/2.8L mk I • 24-70L • 70-200/2.8L IS • 50/1.8 • 24-85 • 400/5.6L • 430EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
GMCPhotographics Goldmember More info | Oct 06, 2009 14:17 | #7 xxza wrote in post #8772208 I don't understand why 50L's reviews are always lower than 35L, 85LII and 135L? I think It's because it gets noticably softer as the focus point gets closer to min Focus Distance. Which is exactly where most lens testers place their lens charts... Regards, Gareth Cooper GMCPhotographics
LOG IN TO REPLY |
x.pozhr Goldmember More info | Oct 06, 2009 17:15 | #8 xxza wrote in post #8772208 I don't understand why 50L's reviews are always lower than 35L, 85LII and 135L?
flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mikeassk THREAD STARTER Goldmember 2,329 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego/ San Fran/ Berkeley More info | Oct 06, 2009 17:45 | #9 I was impressed by the lens, dont get me wrong. One of my favorite shots from the wedding came from this lens, but my keeper rate was very low, i missed focus alot. And I am not complaining just about that, I could not acquire focus at times at all,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
winodavid Member 37 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Texas More info | I have experienced focusing problems with the 50L in very low light (near darkness) but never when there is at least "dusk" level light. I don't consider this abnormal since I've encountered this with most of my lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1052 guests, 103 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||