Giving it to me with both guns , I appreciate it.
I usually have another stashed on my ankle but only take it out for special occasions.
OK, OK, zenfolio has a feature to take out the random numbers. I'll work on a domain name once I think of a good and unique name.
Whatever your business name will be or is, WesPhotography.com is taken already but look at other options that play off that or use your full name if you want. I chose MJ Photos at first and had an annoying url like shorturl.com/mjphotos - it took awhile to get out of that before using my full name as I thought the previous was unprofessional sounding - and the fact I couldn't think of a better one that I'd like in long term. Once you have a name out there people associate it with everything you do, even though I use my own name I've been asked several times "oh you work for Mike?" - usual answer - "sure do, the guys a jerk". So that's why it's important to have all this stuff worked out before you dive in.
Domains were more expensive when I started so had a freebie for a bit as well, http://www.geocities.com/mikejanesphotography/
still works!! Nothing but problems so find one as a temp. Right now I have 3 that point to my site....at $6 you're not losing much!
Admittedly it is cheap. But since no one really knows me. This was my first step. The pano was actually my best seller since it got a little of everyone. I still have a 100% marked up with a metallic finish (assuming I amortize the S&H over a number of customers
You're not the only one that thinks this but in all honesty it's a poor excuse newbies make up. We all did it to start, I know I did, and it just wasn't worth it. Pricing structure should be researched and not based on wanting to get your name out there. Getting your name out there is part of your marketing and not pricing. Honestly you don't want to be known as the cheap guy, or the way too expensive guy either - find the middle ground for the market and people will think it's fair with very few exceptions. 100% markup sounds like a lot when you base it off your print cost but you have to include time, work, the wear and tear on your equipment, etc. I'd include insurance, studio rental, etc. but assuming you're not that far yet.
Most of the "people" were parents with P&S, though one guy had a Nikon D3 using it like a P&S. I applied the vignetting globally to many of the photos to save time. The background appeared fairly bright so I wanted to tone it down a bit. If the girl you're referring to is the football shot, yes this was a big mistake, this truly was a quickie snapshot. This one was really one for the parents that missed out in ordering photos from the pros. And cut off heads???? None of the 'set' shots have this. You looking at the right gallery?
I believe it was the football shot...there is one of the mothers in the fair shots with the top of her head cut off in the hair I remember but don't have the time to go look through again as all this is being written in a hurry. As for the background, well - this all goes back to IQ, if it was too hot you didn't have the settings right. I see vignetting on a LOT of shots, not just the fair ones so that's why I say too much. Not sure how much time you had to be there and set up but if you couldn't get it your way things should of been adjusted on the spot. If there was time to set up a scene and get a backdrop there was time to scope the venue and figure things out.
I not a expert at this but I've photographing little league for the past 4 years and 1000's of shots. I know how difficult to capture the shot - anticipation, fast shutter speeds, AI focus, watching out I don't beaned by the ball ...
Those are four basic things anyone should know - there's a lot more to it than that, especially nowadays with everyone owning a camera. I took four years to learn before thinking about this as a business as well, yet still learned the most since that day and always trying to learn more. You never stop, you're never good enough, you should always want to improve. I take this attitude from my playing/coaching career - the day you think you're good enough you should quit...there's always room for improvement.
Admittedly the position was not ideal - subjects facing the sun, but the PTA (not me) set this up. But really, these were just some causal shots like you see at fairs and some photog asks you if want a shot with "mickey" (or your favorite character)
Be a perfectionalist - get there early and explain why you'd like to try it another way. You have to explain it in a manner not to make it sound like they don't know what they're doing but in most cases they don't and need the photographer to know what to do for the best results. Always listen though as the person in charge sometimes has great ideas that just need a little help. This is another thing many photogs do to start out with, trust me! You should have the knowledge and a vision, even the simple shots. Sometimes it can't be avoided but most of the time it can. Been doing assembly line photography like this for awhile to, but in sports, and it can be done - hell I just changed my entire system, had a hiccup of IQ in there for a bit IMO (but the parents still loved them) and now things are starting to work smoother again. It's a never ending process, sometimes you'll fail - it happens, embrace and learn from it.
Yes, they are low. But this was just a school event of probably about a couple hundred people. Since people really didn't come to the event to get their picture taken (and we never done this before), I thought the download was an simple option to get something out of the event.
It sounds like it was planned a little bit ahead of time so far, which makes the above null IMO. Not sure how far ahead you knew you'd be doing pics and it would differ for how long but this price structure is only going to hurt you. What happens at the next event you do where you plan on raising your prices and all of a sudden you just pi$$ed off a lot of parents thinking they were getting the $3 download. Price structures are not to be taken lightly and you can't just raise/lower without thinking about it.
I appreciate your frankness (but you could work on some bedside manner). I believe I know a thing or two about IQ (and continue to work on the craft). Believe it or not, I've made some money from the event and many have commented positively about the shots.
I've never been accused of not being straight forward and too the point. None of this is to personally attack in any sense as it's all mistakes that many pros, including myself, have made. So why would anyone want to do the same old mistakes already made when they can avoid them and do things right? It's insane like Einstein said - Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
IQ, I can understand why you'd take offense to this but I have to question it. When first joining a board I had the same thing happen and turned out they were all right and I was wrong...not a bad thing, you learn a lot more from what you did wrong than you do right. Anyways, nothing really sticks out to me in the event photography, and there's no sports on the site as well. Those are the two areas you mentioned so those are the only I'll bring up - though do like some of the landscape stuff I saw.
So, just wondering - what shots do you think on there are you best? Portfolio if you will, which I need to do one to now that I think of it.
Good read...
http://www.sportsshooter.com/news/2082