Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 09 Oct 2009 (Friday) 12:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yellow Casting when Uploading to Web

 
mattograph
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Oct 09, 2009 12:05 |  #1

I have some photos I just uploaded to smugmug, and they took on a definite yellow cast. I tried similar uploads to flickr, but the same thing happened. Yellow Cast.

The cast is not there in LR, or in the jpeg I exported from lightroom. I tried both sRGB and Prophoto RGB, with the same results.

I have never seen this before. Thoughts?


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HankScorpio
Goldmember
Avatar
2,700 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: England, baby!
     
Oct 09, 2009 13:56 |  #2

Can we see them?


My collection of boxes with holes (external link)
EXIF semper intacta.
Gort! Klaatu barada nikto.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevitivity
Member
Avatar
152 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Pasadena CA
     
Oct 09, 2009 16:27 |  #3

It could be your browser, but you need to post examples. Maybe take screen shots and post them side by side, along with details of your setup, OS, etc.



Blog  (external link)| Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
THREAD ­ STARTER
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Oct 09, 2009 18:02 |  #4

Okay here is the screen grab....

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3511/3996049951_6de6624ce8_b.jpg

and here is the posted picture

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
basroil
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,015 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2006
Location: STL/Clayton, MO| NJ
     
Oct 09, 2009 18:14 |  #5

Considering your grab and image look different, you definitely have profile issues. Check the stickies on how to properly calibrate your screen and programs.


I don't hate macs or OSX, I hate people and statements that portray them as better than anything else. Macs are A solution, not THE solution. Get a good desktop i7 with Windows 7 and come tell me that sucks for photo or video editing.
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcflora
"I'm not normal"
Avatar
1,544 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2009
Location: Australia
     
Oct 09, 2009 18:15 |  #6

Strange. They look exactly the same to me. Maybe I am going blind (? :D)


Craig
http://www.australimag​e.com.au (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rjc1
Senior Member
Avatar
553 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Ohio
     
Oct 09, 2009 18:28 |  #7

The screen grab shot looks very good to me . The posted pic looks desaturated and a slight blue cast. Is your monitor Calibrated? I guess I don't know which one is the way you see on your screen?


40D with 28-135 IS , Tamron 17-50 ,100-400 f4.5-5.6L, 100mm f2.8L macro IS, 430EX, 430EXll,MiniTT1/FlexTT​5 , Kata R-103,
Domke F2 shooters bag

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
THREAD ­ STARTER
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Oct 09, 2009 18:47 |  #8

They both look the same to me too, but neither looks like the LR2 original. I had my wife look at them side by side, and she said "that one is yellow!"

I have a new spyder on order, but this isn't a profile issue. Its a "uploaded and color shifted" issue.

What would cause that?


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 09, 2009 19:20 |  #9

You're looking at the screen capture direct and at the posted picture with your browser. And that's your problem - color management in your browser, probably.

The only difference between the two pictures you posted is the bottom one is slightly less bright.

Proof? OK, let's pixel-peep.

I loaded both into my picture editor (Paint Shop Pro) - note that I'm using the same program to view them both.

I used the eyedropper to get color values. These were taken on the inverted "V" eave above the doorway at the right (RGB values):

Top: 225, 221, 221 (white with a very slight red cast)
Bottom: 215, 211, 212

225 / 215 = 1.047.

If I multiply the bottom RGB values by 1.047 to simulate an exactly identical exposure, I get:

225, 221, 222. An identical color within .5% blue. (Actually, this varies slightly from pixel to pixel when reading colors and means nothing.)

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gcflora
"I'm not normal"
Avatar
1,544 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2009
Location: Australia
     
Oct 09, 2009 19:39 |  #10

number six wrote in post #8793210 (external link)
You're looking at the screen capture direct and at the posted picture with your browser. And that's your problem - color management in your browser, probably.

The only difference between the two pictures you posted is the bottom one is slightly less bright.

Proof? OK, let's pixel-peep.

I loaded both into my picture editor (Paint Shop Pro) - note that I'm using the same program to view them both.

I used the eyedropper to get color values. These were taken on the inverted "V" eave above the doorway at the right (RGB values):

Top: 225, 221, 221 (white with a very slight red cast)
Bottom: 215, 211, 212

225 / 215 = 1.047.

If I multiply the bottom RGB values by 1.047 to simulate an exactly identical exposure, I get:

225, 221, 222. An identical color within .5% blue. (Actually, this varies slightly from pixel to pixel when reading colors and means nothing.)

-js


Well that slight difference is probably due to the monitor/display profile (???)


Craig
http://www.australimag​e.com.au (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
THREAD ­ STARTER
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Oct 09, 2009 19:57 |  #11

color management in my browser...... hmmm....... now that has promise....


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
fully entitled to be jealous
Avatar
8,964 posts
Likes: 109
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Oct 09, 2009 22:59 |  #12

gcflora wrote in post #8793280 (external link)
Well that slight difference is probably due to the monitor/display profile (???)

Nope. Sometimes "nothing" means "nothing".

-js


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevitivity
Member
Avatar
152 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Pasadena CA
     
Oct 10, 2009 04:00 |  #13

mattograph wrote in post #8792886 (external link)
Okay here is the screen grab....

and here is the posted picture

What web browser are you using?



Blog  (external link)| Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Oct 10, 2009 04:37 as a reply to  @ kevitivity's post |  #14

On my calibrated monitor the two look massively different. Not just brightness, its over saturated in one and desaturated in the other, never mind the colour shifts.

Possibly a monitor calibration problem, or not being applied somehow?


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mattograph
THREAD ­ STARTER
"God bless the new meds"
Avatar
7,693 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
     
Oct 10, 2009 08:38 |  #15

kevitivity wrote in post #8794963 (external link)
What web browser are you using?

Safari. I switched to firefox, and they looked improvedly better.

If thats a word.


This space for rent.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,218 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Yellow Casting when Uploading to Web
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1592 guests, 137 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.