crc_408 Member 137 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: San Jose, CA More info | May 30, 2005 03:17 | #1 Would appreciate any suggestions on which type and lens works best for low-light indoor situations. Already have a 50mm/1.8, but I'm looking for something a bit wider, but can't decided between a prime or zoom. Chris (Gear List)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | May 30, 2005 04:10 | #2 There's a 16-25L? Never heard of that before. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andy_T Compensating for his small ... sensor 9,860 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Hannover Germany More info | May 30, 2005 04:27 | #3 There are no faster zooms than f/2.8 in any range. some cameras, some lenses,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ISimonius Weather Sealed Photographer  6,508 posts Gallery: 19 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 49 Joined Feb 2005 Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes More info | May 30, 2005 05:39 | #4 crc_408 wrote: Would appreciate any suggestions on which type and lens works best for low-light indoor situations. Already have a 50mm/1.8, but I'm looking for something a bit wider, but can't decided between a prime or zoom. Here's a couple of lens I"m looking at in each catagory: Prime 24mm 1.4L 35mm 1.4L Zoom 16-25mm 2.8L 28-70mm 2.8L Is there a faster zoom in these ranges? Thanks. Looked at the 24L and at the reviews - not impressed Veni, Vidi, Snappi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola POTN SHOPKEEPER  3,130 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Millstone Township, NJ More info | I find my zooms to be fairly useless in low light, with the exception of the 70-200/2.8L IS because the IS will give me the handholdability of an f/1.4. It does not give the shutter speed of an f/1.4, though, so it won't stop movement like an f/1.4 can in those situations. Philip Casciola
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssim POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005  10,884 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2003 Location: southern Alberta, Canada More info | I assume that you are referring to the 16-35 f2.8 L. I have this lens and have found it to be very good in low light. The question is how low of light are you shooting. I have not had any experience with the two prime you've listed so I will not comment on them. I can, however, recommend the 16-35 based on my own experiences. My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andy_T Compensating for his small ... sensor 9,860 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Hannover Germany More info | May 30, 2005 05:57 | #7 A cheap alternative might also be the 35/2.0. some cameras, some lenses,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mdr Goldmember  1,167 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Glasgow, Scotland More info | May 30, 2005 06:51 | #8 The fastest Canon prime is the 50mm f1.0 USM. It's not a typo, it's a super fast f1.0 lens. You'll need to hunt one down second hand though, as Canon no longer makes these. Marc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim wrote: There's a 16-25L? Sorry...meant to type 16-35...:o Chris (Gear List)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pcasciola POTN SHOPKEEPER 3,130 posts Joined Sep 2004 Location: Millstone Township, NJ More info | crc_408 wrote: The 28mm/1.8 may be an option. Any comments on this lens? Drisley is selling one in the marketplace. Philip Casciola
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Andy_T Compensating for his small ... sensor 9,860 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jan 2003 Location: Hannover Germany More info | May 30, 2005 13:04 | #11 Look here: some cameras, some lenses,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lostdoggy King Duffus  4,787 posts Joined Aug 2004 Location: Queens, NY More info | mdr wrote: The fastest Canon prime is the 50mm f1.0 USM. It's not a typo, it's a super fast f1.0 lens. You'll need to hunt one down second hand though, as Canon no longer makes these. Just for argument sake the fastest canon prime is 50MM f/0.95 introduced in 1961!!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ISimonius Weather Sealed Photographer 6,508 posts Gallery: 19 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 49 Joined Feb 2005 Location: On a Small Blue Planet with Small Blue People With Small Blue Eyes More info | crc_408 wrote: Sorry...meant to type 16-35...:o Thanks for all your comments!! One of my main attemtps is to increase shutter speed and minimizing a high ISO. I know there's always a balance to be met. I have the 85/1.8 but it's too close. The 50/1.8 is fine, but I'm still looking for a slightly wider lens. The 28mm/1.8 may be an option. Any comments on this lens? I'm looking at the 24mm f2.8 at the moment Veni, Vidi, Snappi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sean-Mcr Goldmember  1,813 posts Likes: 4 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Manchester, England More info | May 30, 2005 17:46 | #14 I've been thinking about buying the 35mm 1.4L myself. I wanted a fast zoom so i bought a 16-35, but once i got my primes a week later i found t that for me the zoom was not fast enough and too and soft wide open. Primes simply gave me more so i took the 16-35 back, i might buy a 17-40 for strictly for outdoors/good indoor light and the 35mm 1.4L. 35's hardly wide , but i love what it can produce. I don't know what good composition is.... Sometimes for me composition has to do with a certain brightness or a certain coming to restness and other times it has to do with funny mistakes. There's a kind of rightness and wrongness and sometimes I like rightness and sometimes I like wrongness. Diane Arbus
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1875 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
)
