Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 11 Oct 2009 (Sunday) 12:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

300mm f/4 image quality issue

 
kb9tdj
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 168
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Shelbyville, indiana
     
Oct 11, 2009 12:36 |  #1

I have not been happy with the image quality from my 300 f/4 IS lens lately and thought a focus micro-adjustment would help out, so I rented a Lens Align pro from lensrentals.com and am not happy at all with what I'm seeing. Posted below is a 1:1 crop where I focused manually using the maximum magnification in live view. I don't see any place at all that has sharp focus which leads me to believe that I may have some optical issues as opposed to focus issues. The target was 25' away from my camera (50D) and I used a wireless remote to trigger the shutter, had mirror lock enabled to minimize vibrations and also had IS turned off. I also have no filter on the lens for this test.

I figured that even if I missed the manual focus at all, then I should at least see some part of the ruler in focus, but there is no part at all that is as sharp as I would expect from this lens. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Is it time to ship if off to Canon for an inspection? This is bad timing since I have a trip down to the Florida Keys planned in about 10 days and was going to use this lens for wildlife photography while there.


IMAGE: http://www.scottrichardsonphotography.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/IMG_2583.jpg

Scott
1D Mk IV | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS II | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | 1.4x Extender
www.scottrichardsonpho​tography.com (external link) YouTube Channel (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnJ80
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
     
Oct 11, 2009 13:22 |  #2

You know, it's funny that you brought this up. I've been having problems with mine too all of a sudden. Looks about the same. I'm using it on a 40D and a 1Dmk3.

j.


Obsessive Gear List
"It isn't what you don't know that gets you in trouble; it's what you know for sure that isn't so." - Mark Twain

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kb9tdj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 168
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Shelbyville, indiana
     
Oct 11, 2009 13:28 |  #3

JohnJ80 wrote in post #8801378 (external link)
You know, it's funny that you brought this up. I've been having problems with mine too all of a sudden. Looks about the same. I'm using it on a 40D and a 1Dmk3.

j.

Strange. Maybe I'm just too much of a pixel-peeper, but I do notice the lower image quality in "real life" situations. I shoot mainly sports action and have been favoring my 70-200 2.8 IS lately because I can rely on the great images I get from it. I really hate leaving the 300 in the bag as much as I do.


Scott
1D Mk IV | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS II | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | 1.4x Extender
www.scottrichardsonpho​tography.com (external link) YouTube Channel (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Cesium
Goldmember
1,967 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 11, 2009 13:37 |  #4

1/60 shutter speed. Was your tripod on carpet by any chance?

You need much better lighting for this test also.

Edit: Just noticed that it's a 1:1 crop also. I think your expectations are just a bit too high here....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kb9tdj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 168
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Shelbyville, indiana
     
Oct 11, 2009 13:47 |  #5

Cesium wrote in post #8801441 (external link)
1/60 shutter speed. Was your tripod on carpet by any chance?

You need much better lighting for this test also.

Edit: Just noticed that it's a 1:1 crop also. I think your expectations are just a bit too high here....

Yep, the tripod is on carpet, but I did use the mirror lock and waited a few seconds after the mirror was up before I tripped the shutter. I'll adjust the light and try some more.

You're right about my expectations, maybe they are a bit too high. I'll test my other lenses (see my sig) and do a relative comparison, maybe that'll help put things in perspective.


Scott
1D Mk IV | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS II | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | 1.4x Extender
www.scottrichardsonpho​tography.com (external link) YouTube Channel (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
int2str
Goldmember
1,881 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
     
Oct 11, 2009 13:57 |  #6

I agree with Cesium.

Also, if you were indeed trying to do the MA with the LensAlign, I think you were much too close to it.

How much of a crop is this?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
int2str
Goldmember
1,881 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Fremont, CA
     
Oct 11, 2009 13:59 |  #7

kb9tdj wrote in post #8801488 (external link)
Yep, the tripod is on carpet, but I did use the mirror lock and waited a few seconds after the mirror was up before I tripped the shutter.

Remote shutter release?
If not, use the 10sec timer. I just tried mine and even 2 seconds weren't enough to stop shake on carpet.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnJ80
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,442 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2006
     
Oct 11, 2009 14:36 |  #8

I missed the lighting and shutter speed. You need to be doing this with good light (like sunlight). I've seen huge variation in AF that goes away in good light with most cameras.

j.


Obsessive Gear List
"It isn't what you don't know that gets you in trouble; it's what you know for sure that isn't so." - Mark Twain

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger ­ Cicala
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
     
Oct 11, 2009 20:27 |  #9

It looks like there's maybe a tiny bit of backfocus (easily adjusted) but I don't think focus calibration is the problem (the "0" line area is sharper than the rest). The image does look soft and I agree with improving your lighting to check if that helps, but I think you may be right: I'd expect the 300 f4 to be as sharp as anything else in your bag and better than this.

One thing that may be of interest: at Lensrentals we got a large number of 300 f4 IS in Jan - Feb that were really soft and had to go back to the mother ship to be tuned up. On our Lens repair data base that lens basically went from 'never needs repair' to the top of the chart for a 6 months period ( http://www.lensrentals​.com …05.17/lens-repair-data-30 (external link) ). After that we've never had trouble again, but it makes me wonder if perhaps there was a bad batch out there.


My gear is www.lensrentals.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mspringfield
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
     
Oct 12, 2009 09:00 |  #10

A couple of things that jump out at me. The 300 F/4 IS is 2 stops. If you figure 1/320 is the minimum for a 300mm then 2 stops would be 1/80 and your shot was at 1/60. Also at 25' your DOF is about 4 inches so any kind of mirror shake or even manually pressing the shutter can put your focus point outside the DOF. How does it perform in real life? I love mine and the focus seem to be right on.

Michael


Michael Springfield - Chattanooga, TN
Canon 1DsMkIII, Canon EOS M, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS, Canon EF 1.4x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kb9tdj
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
591 posts
Gallery: 73 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 168
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Shelbyville, indiana
     
Oct 12, 2009 09:14 |  #11

mspringfield wrote in post #8805749 (external link)
A couple of things that jump out at me. The 300 F/4 IS is 2 stops. If you figure 1/320 is the minimum for a 300mm then 2 stops would be 1/80 and your shot was at 1/60. Also at 25' your DOF is about 4 inches so any kind of mirror shake or even manually pressing the shutter can put your focus point outside the DOF. How does it perform in real life? I love mine and the focus seem to be right on.

Michael

Seems like 1/60 should have been ok given the camera was on a tripod and and I used a wireless remote along with mirror lock to minimize vibration. Note also that the IS was turned off since the camera/lens were tripod-mounted. I have since tried the setup again outside for better lighting and higher shutter speeds and am still analyzing the results.

In real life the images do seem a bit soft. I'll see if I can dig through my collection and post a few examples when I get a chance.


Scott
1D Mk IV | 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II | 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS II | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 | 1.4x Extender
www.scottrichardsonpho​tography.com (external link) YouTube Channel (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mspringfield
Senior Member
Avatar
869 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 21
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Chattanooga, TN
     
Oct 12, 2009 09:48 |  #12

kb9tdj wrote in post #8805822 (external link)
Seems like 1/60 should have been ok given the camera was on a tripod and and I used a wireless remote along with mirror lock to minimize vibration. Note also that the IS was turned off since the camera/lens were tripod-mounted. I have since tried the setup again outside for better lighting and higher shutter speeds and am still analyzing the results.

In real life the images do seem a bit soft. I'll see if I can dig through my collection and post a few examples when I get a chance.

True. A tripod should have helped. I have seen a lot of people saying the the 300 F4 IS is not as sharp as the older non-IS. I may be lucky and have a good one.


Michael Springfield - Chattanooga, TN
Canon 1DsMkIII, Canon EOS M, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L IS, Canon EF 1.4x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,125 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
300mm f/4 image quality issue
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1043 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.