DStanic wrote in post #8808982
I think as photographers we are more critical on technical aspects, and when we accomplish something that we think is amazing (something difficult to do) a "regular" person might not care at all. "Regular" people usually just care about the subject in the picture, how well it's composed and exposed only adds to how good it is.
I think this is a big part of it. We're too close to the process, plus we know the technicalities and the subtleties that were missed. An average viewer not as "into" the craft as we are doesn't, and actually has the freedom and luxury of not knowing and is thus able to just look at it and either enjoy it or not.
birdfromboat wrote in post #8830396
I had an instructer tell me to never delete in the field, always give a decent exposure a second chance and a second opinion if possible. She said that even seasoned pros will be surprised by what the editors pick for print use. I have always had other people tell me they like different shots than what I would pick, sometimes they are trying to be supportive but sometimes a second opinion will help me see something I got that I wasn't really trying for.
Yep. I can show a dozen people a dozen shots and ask each which is their favorite and get almost a dozen different answers.