Was earlier this year-February I think. And no "Calibration Deterioration".
btw, how long ago was that? have you seen any "calibration deterioration" since then?
Jmantyger Senior Member 296 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2007 Location: Prattville, AL USA More info | Oct 12, 2009 23:41 | #31 Was earlier this year-February I think. And no "Calibration Deterioration". dipps wrote in post #8810941 btw, how long ago was that? have you seen any "calibration deterioration" since then? 5D MKIII, 16-35L f/4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L II f/2.8 IS, 100-400L II, 430 EX III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Oct 12, 2009 23:44 | #32 By any chance was the OP in AI Servo focus mode? Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Oct 13, 2009 00:01 | #33 Any time you buy a new lens and it has a warranty, you should feel free to use that warranty very liberally because it's the only thing justifying the "new" premium. I had a soft copy of the lens that went back to canon 3 or 4 times (I lost count) before it was finally sharp. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Poe Goldmember 1,956 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Modesto, CA More info | Oct 13, 2009 00:58 | #34 The photos are out of focus (looks like focused on the foreground) except for the one with the woman and two children. That one is typically what the 24-70 should deliver. Your lens is fine.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2009 05:57 | #35 FlyingPhotog wrote in post #8811099 By any chance was the OP in AI Servo focus mode? nope, quite certain i was in one-shot mode. i had a number of checks i performed while waiting for the rest of the folks to show up, and that was one of them. 5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | "Multi-point" AF mode still only uses ONE autofocus point. You're just telling the camera - "I don't care where you focus"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | My 24-70L is tack sharp. It sometimes "misses" focus only because you have to realize that the actual area covered by each sensor is quite a bit bigger than the little red "dot" in the viewfinder.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2009 08:25 | #38 on the bright side, i was smart enough to shoot in large jpeg + RAW format, so i have copies of all these images in CR2 file format. i've never really gotten in to raw image editing before, but i figured for such an event, now was the time to jump in, just to make sure i had my bases covered should the photos not turn out all that well. i just finished downloading and installing DPP (not sure what everyone else around here uses, but DPP was in my current price range after spending big coin on this lens 5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2009 08:29 | #39 egordon99 wrote in post #8812472 "Multi-point" AF mode still only uses ONE autofocus point. You're just telling the camera - "I don't care where you focus" ![]() ONLY reason to use "multi-point" is in AI Servo as the camera will start with the center point, and then "track" the subject using the other points if it drifts from the center. ANY other situation, YOU need to explicity select the ONE autofocus point. thanks. that is helpful. i'll add that to my photog learning scribble notes. i studied up as much as possible prior to this event (which focal length to use, distance from subject, sweet spot/aperture of the lens i chose, etc), but i obviously thought that multipoint AF was the best option, basically due to the fact that there are faces "all over the map" in the image, and i wanted them all to be in focus, not just the one that i used center point focus to focus in on. misunderstanding on my part, i guess. 5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles* 10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Oct 13, 2009 08:30 | #40 The 24-70mm is obviously not a prime. But you should expect quality approaching that of one... If there's any doubt, send it to Canon for a calibration check (and adjustment). You'll be out a lens for a week and it might run you $95 or so out of warranty - but at least you'll know what the deal is. La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2009 08:32 | #41 I just LOVE my 24-70mm. It might not be my favorite lens, but it sure is my most-used! looking at the line-up in your sig line, that's saying something. 5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
egordon99 Cream of the Crop 10,247 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2008 Location: Philly 'burbs More info | Oct 13, 2009 09:07 | #42 dipps wrote in post #8812549 i obviously thought that multipoint AF was the best option, basically due to the fact that there are faces "all over the map" in the image, and i wanted them all to be in focus, not just the one that i used center point focus to focus in on. misunderstanding on my part, i guess. ![]() The way to get them "all to be in focus" is to select the appropriate aperture for your desired depth-of-field.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 13, 2009 09:20 | #43 egordon99 wrote in post #8812737 The way to get them "all to be in focus" is to select the appropriate aperture for your desired depth-of-field. for that particular lens, was f/5.6 too shallow?? 5DIII, 7D, 16-35 f/2.8L II, 24-70 f/2.8L II, 24-105 f/4L, 40 f/2.8, 135 f/2L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L macro, 70-200 f/2.8L II, 430EX II, POWERSHOT S95.... i'm your huckleberry.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
midget Senior Member 511 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: NY More info | Oct 13, 2009 09:50 | #44 5.6 should've been enough at the distance that you were standing at, people correct me if im wrong 40d + 50mm f1.8 MK I + my feet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
anonymous_object Member 56 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Oct 13, 2009 14:13 | #45 Like everyone else is saying, that looks looks like a focusing issue. Try manually focusing on something to see if you can get sharper results. Not sure how well the live view works on the 450D, but that is also a good method for manual focus testing when fully zoomed in. The lens could just be front/back focusing. Canon 5D2, 50mm 1.2, 24-70 2.8, 70-200mm f/4 IS, 100mm Macro 2.8 IS, Sigma 15mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is vinceisvisual 1200 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||